How are children’s strategy selection and execution related to their executive functions? A choice/no-choice study in multi-step arithmetic

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL European Journal of Psychology of Education Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1007/s10212-024-00889-4
Stijn Van Der Auwera, Bert De Smedt, Joke Torbeyns, Lieven Verschaffel
{"title":"How are children’s strategy selection and execution related to their executive functions? A choice/no-choice study in multi-step arithmetic","authors":"Stijn Van Der Auwera, Bert De Smedt, Joke Torbeyns, Lieven Verschaffel","doi":"10.1007/s10212-024-00889-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, an increasing number of studies have examined the association between mathematical abilities and executive functions (EFs). However, it remains unknown via which mechanisms’ mathematical performance is associated with EFs. The current study examined the associations of overall task proficiency, strategy selection, and strategy execution when solving multi-step subtraction problems with three EFs (i.e., updating, inhibition, and shifting). With a choice/no-choice design, 150 fifth-graders’ (<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 10 years, 11 months) direct subtraction (DS; e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 712 − 300 = 412, 412 − 40 = 372, and 372 − 6 = 366) and subtraction by addition (SBA; e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 346 + 54 = 400, 400 + 300 = 700, 700 + 12 = 712, and 54 + 300 + 12 = 366) use to solve multi-step subtractions was examined. Participants were offered ten subtractions in one choice condition (free choice between DS and SBA), based on which we obtained data about task proficiency and strategy selection, and in two no-choice conditions (mandatory use of either DS or SBA), which were used to examine strategy execution. The results showed that task proficiency in the choice condition was associated with updating and inhibition but not with shifting. Furthermore, strategy selection was associated with updating but not with inhibition and shifting. Strategy execution was associated with updating but not with inhibition and shifting. The inclusion of separate strategy selection and execution parameters helped to unravel how arithmetic performance and EFs are associated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47800,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00889-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of studies have examined the association between mathematical abilities and executive functions (EFs). However, it remains unknown via which mechanisms’ mathematical performance is associated with EFs. The current study examined the associations of overall task proficiency, strategy selection, and strategy execution when solving multi-step subtraction problems with three EFs (i.e., updating, inhibition, and shifting). With a choice/no-choice design, 150 fifth-graders’ (Mage = 10 years, 11 months) direct subtraction (DS; e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 712 − 300 = 412, 412 − 40 = 372, and 372 − 6 = 366) and subtraction by addition (SBA; e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 346 + 54 = 400, 400 + 300 = 700, 700 + 12 = 712, and 54 + 300 + 12 = 366) use to solve multi-step subtractions was examined. Participants were offered ten subtractions in one choice condition (free choice between DS and SBA), based on which we obtained data about task proficiency and strategy selection, and in two no-choice conditions (mandatory use of either DS or SBA), which were used to examine strategy execution. The results showed that task proficiency in the choice condition was associated with updating and inhibition but not with shifting. Furthermore, strategy selection was associated with updating but not with inhibition and shifting. Strategy execution was associated with updating but not with inhibition and shifting. The inclusion of separate strategy selection and execution parameters helped to unravel how arithmetic performance and EFs are associated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童的策略选择和执行与他们的执行功能有何关系?多步算术中的选择/非选择研究
近年来,越来越多的研究探讨了数学能力与执行功能(EFs)之间的关联。然而,人们仍然不知道数学成绩与执行功能是通过何种机制联系在一起的。本研究考察了在解决多步减法问题时,整体任务熟练度、策略选择和策略执行与三种执行功能(即更新、抑制和转移)之间的关联。通过选择/非选择设计,150 名五年级学生(年龄 = 10 岁 11 个月)的直接减法(DS;例如,712 - 346 = ?;712 - 300 = 412;412 - 40 = 372;372 - 6 = 366)和加法减法(SBA;例如、712 - 346 = ?; 346 + 54 = 400, 400 + 300 = 700, 700 + 12 = 712, 和 54 + 300 + 12 = 366)来解决多步减法。在一种选择条件下(在 DS 和 SBA 之间自由选择),我们获得了有关任务熟练程度和策略选择的数据;在两种非选择条件下(强制使用 DS 或 SBA),我们考察了策略执行情况。结果表明,在选择条件下,任务熟练程度与更新和抑制有关,但与转移无关。此外,策略选择与更新有关,但与抑制和转移无关。策略执行与更新有关,但与抑制和转移无关。加入单独的策略选择和执行参数有助于揭示算术成绩和EF之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychology of Education (EJPE) is a quarterly journal oriented toward publishing high-quality papers that address the relevant psychological aspects of educational processes embedded in different institutional, social, and cultural contexts, and which focus on diversity in terms of the participants, their educational trajectories and their socio-cultural contexts. Authors are strongly encouraged to employ a variety of theoretical and methodological tools developed in the psychology of education in order to gain new insights by integrating different perspectives. Instead of reinforcing the divisions and distances between different communities stemming from their theoretical and methodological backgrounds, we would like to invite authors to engage with diverse theoretical and methodological tools in a meaningful way and to search for the new knowledge that can emerge from a combination of these tools. EJPE is open to all papers reflecting findings from original psychological studies on educational processes, as well as to exceptional theoretical and review papers that integrate current knowledge and chart new avenues for future research. Following the assumption that engaging with diversities creates great opportunities for new knowledge, the editorial team wishes to encourage, in particular, authors from less represented countries and regions, as well as young researchers, to submit their work and to keep going through the review process, which can be challenging, but which also presents opportunities for learning and inspiration.
期刊最新文献
Giving voice to educators: Primary school teachers explain how they promote values to their pupils Developing gestures in the infant classroom: from showing and giving to pointing The authenticity dilemma: towards a theory on the conditions and effects of authentic learning Peers and value preferences among adolescents in school classes: a social network and longitudinal approach The ups and downs of online intergroup contact interventions: popular narratives and secondary transfer effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1