The Effect of Takeover Protection in Quiet Life and Bonding Firms

IF 3.9 2区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1017/s0022109023001473
Eliezer M. Fich, Jarrad Harford, Adam S. Yore
{"title":"The Effect of Takeover Protection in Quiet Life and Bonding Firms","authors":"Eliezer M. Fich, Jarrad Harford, Adam S. Yore","doi":"10.1017/s0022109023001473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antitakeover measures are controversial because the evidence of their net effect on shareholders is mixed. We propose that, for many firms, the potential bonding benefits outweigh the agency costs of the quiet life, explaining the mixed results. We study business combination and poison pill laws as exogenous shocks to takeover vulnerability and use shareholder valuation of internal slack as an indicator of the net effect of takeover protection. Firms susceptible to quiet life agency problems exhibit a decrease in the market-assessed value of internal slack. Conversely, cash appreciates at companies where takeover protection bonds commitments with major counterparties.</p>","PeriodicalId":48380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109023001473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antitakeover measures are controversial because the evidence of their net effect on shareholders is mixed. We propose that, for many firms, the potential bonding benefits outweigh the agency costs of the quiet life, explaining the mixed results. We study business combination and poison pill laws as exogenous shocks to takeover vulnerability and use shareholder valuation of internal slack as an indicator of the net effect of takeover protection. Firms susceptible to quiet life agency problems exhibit a decrease in the market-assessed value of internal slack. Conversely, cash appreciates at companies where takeover protection bonds commitments with major counterparties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宁静生活和保税公司的收购保护效果
反收购措施备受争议,因为其对股东的净影响证据不一。我们认为,对许多公司来说,潜在的结合利益大于平静生活的代理成本,这就是结果好坏参半的原因。我们将企业合并和毒丸法作为收购脆弱性的外生冲击进行研究,并将股东对内部松弛的估值作为收购保护净效应的指标。易受静默期代理问题影响的公司表现出内部松弛的市场评估价值下降。与此相反,如果公司与主要交易对手之间的承诺有收购保护债券,则现金会升值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.10%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) publishes theoretical and empirical research in financial economics. Topics include corporate finance, investments, capital and security markets, and quantitative methods of particular relevance to financial researchers. With a circulation of 3000 libraries, firms, and individuals in 70 nations, the JFQA serves an international community of sophisticated finance scholars—academics and practitioners alike. The JFQA prints less than 10% of the more than 600 unsolicited manuscripts submitted annually. An intensive blind review process and exacting editorial standards contribute to the JFQA’s reputation as a top finance journal.
期刊最新文献
Repurchases for Price Impact: Evidence from Fragile Stocks Protecting Your Friends: The Role of Connections in Division Manager Careers Variance Decomposition and Cryptocurrency Return Prediction On the Capital Market Consequences of Big Data: Evidence from Outer Space Consumption Growth Persistence and the Stock–Bond Correlation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1