The governance of hydrosocial risk in peri-urban South Australia

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geographical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1111/1745-5871.12666
Douglas K. Bardsley, Sophie Winsborough, William Skinner, Georgina Drew
{"title":"The governance of hydrosocial risk in peri-urban South Australia","authors":"Douglas K. Bardsley,&nbsp;Sophie Winsborough,&nbsp;William Skinner,&nbsp;Georgina Drew","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change is generating levels of environmental risk that are jeopardising modern development. As the management of water systems becomes more difficult, approaches to governance and engagement within regions are increasingly shaping adaptation successes and failures. We use theory on hydrosocial systems and risk to critically analyse stakeholder experiences of a transition in South Australian water management in peri-urban Adelaide, with detail from the Langhorne Creek viticultural region. Local prescription of water resources has limited over-exploitation and supported landowners to use water in sophisticated ways. When community stakeholders deliberated on common concerns with governance organisations for mutually beneficial outcomes, decision-making supported successful hydrosocial adaptation. Ongoing challenges, such as a lack of confidence in the scientific knowledge guiding decisions, were accentuated when the process was politicised and engagement became inauthentic. If trust between governance organisations and local stakeholders is broken, it is difficult to re-engage the farming community with adaptation decision-making. In contrast, by working closely with community end-users, government can enable appropriate behaviour and guide adaptive management. Attention to hydrosocial processes will be crucial to facilitate effective local adaptation policy in response to climate risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"62 4","pages":"553-568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12666","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is generating levels of environmental risk that are jeopardising modern development. As the management of water systems becomes more difficult, approaches to governance and engagement within regions are increasingly shaping adaptation successes and failures. We use theory on hydrosocial systems and risk to critically analyse stakeholder experiences of a transition in South Australian water management in peri-urban Adelaide, with detail from the Langhorne Creek viticultural region. Local prescription of water resources has limited over-exploitation and supported landowners to use water in sophisticated ways. When community stakeholders deliberated on common concerns with governance organisations for mutually beneficial outcomes, decision-making supported successful hydrosocial adaptation. Ongoing challenges, such as a lack of confidence in the scientific knowledge guiding decisions, were accentuated when the process was politicised and engagement became inauthentic. If trust between governance organisations and local stakeholders is broken, it is difficult to re-engage the farming community with adaptation decision-making. In contrast, by working closely with community end-users, government can enable appropriate behaviour and guide adaptive management. Attention to hydrosocial processes will be crucial to facilitate effective local adaptation policy in response to climate risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南澳大利亚近郊的水文社会风险治理
气候变化带来的环境风险正在危及现代发展。随着水系统管理变得越来越困难,区域内的治理和参与方式也越来越影响着适应的成败。我们利用水社会系统和风险理论,批判性地分析了南澳大利亚阿德莱德近郊区水资源管理转型中利益相关者的经验,并详细介绍了兰霍恩溪葡萄栽培区的情况。当地对水资源的规定限制了过度开发,并支持土地所有者以复杂的方式使用水资源。当社区利益相关者与治理组织就共同关心的问题进行商议,以实现互惠互利的结果时,决策支持了成功的水社会适应。持续存在的挑战,如对指导决策的科学知识缺乏信心,在决策过程被政治化、参与不真实的情况下更加突出。如果管理组织与当地利益相关者之间的信任破裂,就很难让农业社区重新参与适应决策。相反,通过与社区最终用户密切合作,政府可以促成适当的行为并指导适应性管理。关注水文社会进程对于促进有效的地方适应政策以应对气候风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Issue Information For everything there is a season … The power of trees: How ancient forests can save us if we let them By Peter Wohlleben, Collingwood: Black Inc. 2023. pp. 271. Vic. 9781760643621 (paperback), 9781743822869 (hardback) Obituary: Janice Monk We are Country—Country mentors us
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1