Stochastic Trust-Region Algorithm in Random Subspaces with Convergence and Expected Complexity Analyses

IF 2.6 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED SIAM Journal on Optimization Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1137/22m1524072
K. J. Dzahini, S. M. Wild
{"title":"Stochastic Trust-Region Algorithm in Random Subspaces with Convergence and Expected Complexity Analyses","authors":"K. J. Dzahini, S. M. Wild","doi":"10.1137/22m1524072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 3, Page 2671-2699, September 2024. <br/> Abstract. This work proposes a framework for large-scale stochastic derivative-free optimization (DFO) by introducing STARS, a trust-region method based on iterative minimization in random subspaces. This framework is both an algorithmic and theoretical extension of a random subspace derivative-free optimization (RSDFO) framework, and an algorithm for stochastic optimization with random models (STORM). Moreover, like RSDFO, STARS achieves scalability by minimizing interpolation models that approximate the objective in low-dimensional affine subspaces, thus significantly reducing per-iteration costs in terms of function evaluations and yielding strong performance on large-scale stochastic DFO problems. The user-determined dimension of these subspaces, when the latter are defined, for example, by the columns of so-called Johnson–Lindenstrauss transforms, turns out to be independent of the dimension of the problem. For convergence purposes, inspired by the analyses of RSDFO and STORM, both a particular quality of the subspace and the accuracies of random function estimates and models are required to hold with sufficiently high, but fixed, probabilities. Using martingale theory under the latter assumptions, an almost sure global convergence of STARS to a first-order stationary point is shown, and the expected number of iterations required to reach a desired first-order accuracy is proved to be similar to that of STORM and other stochastic DFO algorithms, up to constants.","PeriodicalId":49529,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1524072","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 3, Page 2671-2699, September 2024.
Abstract. This work proposes a framework for large-scale stochastic derivative-free optimization (DFO) by introducing STARS, a trust-region method based on iterative minimization in random subspaces. This framework is both an algorithmic and theoretical extension of a random subspace derivative-free optimization (RSDFO) framework, and an algorithm for stochastic optimization with random models (STORM). Moreover, like RSDFO, STARS achieves scalability by minimizing interpolation models that approximate the objective in low-dimensional affine subspaces, thus significantly reducing per-iteration costs in terms of function evaluations and yielding strong performance on large-scale stochastic DFO problems. The user-determined dimension of these subspaces, when the latter are defined, for example, by the columns of so-called Johnson–Lindenstrauss transforms, turns out to be independent of the dimension of the problem. For convergence purposes, inspired by the analyses of RSDFO and STORM, both a particular quality of the subspace and the accuracies of random function estimates and models are required to hold with sufficiently high, but fixed, probabilities. Using martingale theory under the latter assumptions, an almost sure global convergence of STARS to a first-order stationary point is shown, and the expected number of iterations required to reach a desired first-order accuracy is proved to be similar to that of STORM and other stochastic DFO algorithms, up to constants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机子空间中的随机信任区域算法及收敛性和预期复杂性分析
SIAM 优化期刊》,第 34 卷第 3 期,第 2671-2699 页,2024 年 9 月。 摘要本文通过引入基于随机子空间迭代最小化的信任区域方法 STARS,提出了一种大规模随机无导数优化(DFO)框架。该框架是随机子空间无导数优化(RSDFO)框架和随机模型随机优化算法(STORM)在算法和理论上的扩展。此外,与 RSDFO 一样,STARS 通过最小化在低维仿射子空间中逼近目标的插值模型来实现可扩展性,从而显著降低了函数求值的每次迭代成本,并在大规模随机无导数优化问题上取得了优异的性能。用户确定的这些子空间的维度(例如由所谓的约翰逊-林登斯特劳斯变换的列定义的子空间)与问题的维度无关。受 RSDFO 和 STORM 分析的启发,为了达到收敛的目的,要求子空间的特定质量以及随机函数估计值和模型的精确度以足够高但固定的概率保持不变。在后一种假设条件下使用马丁格尔理论,证明了 STARS 几乎肯定会全局收敛到一阶静止点,并证明了达到所需一阶精度所需的预期迭代次数与 STORM 和其他随机 DFO 算法相似,直至常数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SIAM Journal on Optimization
SIAM Journal on Optimization 数学-应用数学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The SIAM Journal on Optimization contains research articles on the theory and practice of optimization. The areas addressed include linear and quadratic programming, convex programming, nonlinear programming, complementarity problems, stochastic optimization, combinatorial optimization, integer programming, and convex, nonsmooth and variational analysis. Contributions may emphasize optimization theory, algorithms, software, computational practice, applications, or the links between these subjects.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum and Addendum: Newton Differentiability of Convex Functions in Normed Spaces and of a Class of Operators Newton-Based Alternating Methods for the Ground State of a Class of Multicomponent Bose–Einstein Condensates Minimum Spanning Trees in Infinite Graphs: Theory and Algorithms On Minimal Extended Representations of Generalized Power Cones A Functional Model Method for Nonconvex Nonsmooth Conditional Stochastic Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1