Governing Failure Mode of Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs Under Gravity Load Using the Codes Guidelines and Yield-Line Theory

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1007/s40996-024-01538-y
Navid Jafarian, Davood Mostofinejad
{"title":"Governing Failure Mode of Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs Under Gravity Load Using the Codes Guidelines and Yield-Line Theory","authors":"Navid Jafarian, Davood Mostofinejad","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01538-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nowadays, reinforced concrete (RC) flat slabs frequently known as a gravity-load resisting system are being used in almost every building structure due to a number of distinct advantages. On the minus side, the greatest drawback of the RC flat slabs is punching shear failure still hotly debated by researchers. Nevertheless, there is not a source of information to accurately predict the governing failure mechanism of the slabs concerning the severe shortage of a certain hypothetical method. This study was targeted at investigating the governing failure mode of the slabs monotonically subjected to vertical load by reviewing the recommendations of the current codes, i.e., ACI 318-19, EC 2, MC2010, also by using the yield line theory (YLT), as was foremost amongst the literature. For this purpose, the results numerically assessed by the punching shear equations of the codes were compared to those of experimental tests categorized in a database with 88 RC flat slabs. To predict the failure mode of the slabs, the punching shear strength obtained by the codes was compared to the flexural capacity calculated by the YLT. Finally, two case studies on RC flat slabs were proposed to elucidate the changes of shear load-carrying capacity and flexural strength while the flexural reinforcement ratio differed, as were to predict the governing failure mechanism. The slabs’ geometry was identical; one slab was served as the control specimen while the other had four openings located adjacent and parallel to the column. Shear reinforcement was, moreover, employed as a key parameter for improving the punching shear strength of the slabs at the rate of 50%. It was proved that the presented failure-mode prediction methodology is applicable to the design purposes of the slabs by comparing the predicted failure modes with the experimental counterparts. According to the case studies, the governing failure mode of 50%-shear-reinforced slab was punching shear as the flexural reinforcement ratio was more than 0.7% while the failure mode was flexural for lower flexural reinforcement ratios.</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01538-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, reinforced concrete (RC) flat slabs frequently known as a gravity-load resisting system are being used in almost every building structure due to a number of distinct advantages. On the minus side, the greatest drawback of the RC flat slabs is punching shear failure still hotly debated by researchers. Nevertheless, there is not a source of information to accurately predict the governing failure mechanism of the slabs concerning the severe shortage of a certain hypothetical method. This study was targeted at investigating the governing failure mode of the slabs monotonically subjected to vertical load by reviewing the recommendations of the current codes, i.e., ACI 318-19, EC 2, MC2010, also by using the yield line theory (YLT), as was foremost amongst the literature. For this purpose, the results numerically assessed by the punching shear equations of the codes were compared to those of experimental tests categorized in a database with 88 RC flat slabs. To predict the failure mode of the slabs, the punching shear strength obtained by the codes was compared to the flexural capacity calculated by the YLT. Finally, two case studies on RC flat slabs were proposed to elucidate the changes of shear load-carrying capacity and flexural strength while the flexural reinforcement ratio differed, as were to predict the governing failure mechanism. The slabs’ geometry was identical; one slab was served as the control specimen while the other had four openings located adjacent and parallel to the column. Shear reinforcement was, moreover, employed as a key parameter for improving the punching shear strength of the slabs at the rate of 50%. It was proved that the presented failure-mode prediction methodology is applicable to the design purposes of the slabs by comparing the predicted failure modes with the experimental counterparts. According to the case studies, the governing failure mode of 50%-shear-reinforced slab was punching shear as the flexural reinforcement ratio was more than 0.7% while the failure mode was flexural for lower flexural reinforcement ratios.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用规范指南和屈服线理论指导重力荷载下钢筋混凝土平板的破坏模式
如今,钢筋混凝土(RC)平板通常被称为重力荷载抵抗系统,由于具有许多明显的优点,几乎所有的建筑结构都在使用它。但从另一方面来说,钢筋混凝土平板的最大缺点是冲剪破坏,研究人员对此仍有激烈的争论。然而,在某种假设方法严重不足的情况下,并没有准确预测板失效机制的信息来源。本研究旨在通过审查现行规范(即 ACI 318-19、EC 2、MC2010)的建议,并采用文献中最重要的屈服线理论(YLT),研究单调承受垂直荷载的板的支配破坏模式。为此,将通过规范的冲剪方程进行数值评估的结果与数据库中 88 块 RC 平板的实验测试结果进行了比较。为了预测板的破坏模式,将规范获得的冲剪强度与永利国际娱乐计算的抗弯承载力进行了比较。最后,提出了两个关于 RC 平板的案例研究,以阐明在抗弯配筋率不同的情况下剪切承载力和抗弯强度的变化,并预测其失效机制。板的几何形状完全相同;一块板作为对照试样,另一块板上有四个开口,分别位于柱子附近并与柱子平行。此外,还采用了剪力配筋作为关键参数,以提高板的冲剪强度,提高率为 50%。通过比较预测的失效模式和实验结果,证明所提出的失效模式预测方法适用于板的设计目的。根据案例研究,当挠曲配筋率超过 0.7%时,50%剪切加固板的主要破坏模式为冲剪,而当挠曲配筋率较低时,破坏模式为挠曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following: -Structural engineering- Earthquake engineering- Concrete engineering- Construction management- Steel structures- Engineering mechanics- Water resources engineering- Hydraulic engineering- Hydraulic structures- Environmental engineering- Soil mechanics- Foundation engineering- Geotechnical engineering- Transportation engineering- Surveying and geomatics.
期刊最新文献
Coupled Rainfall-Runoff and Hydrodynamic Modeling using MIKE + for Flood Simulation Mechanical and Microstructural Characteristics of Fly Ash-Nano-Silica Composites Enhancement of the Mechanical Characteristics of a Green Mortar Under Extreme Conditions: Experimental Study and Optimization Analysis A Case Study on the Effect of Multiple Earthquakes on Mid-rise RC Buildings with Mass and Stiffness Irregularity in Height Incremental Plastic Analysis of Confined Concrete Considering the Variation of Elastic Moduli
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1