Modeling dominant height with USGS 3DEP LiDAR to determine site index in even-aged loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern US

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forestry Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1093/forestry/cpae034
Vicent A Ribas-Costa, Aitor Gastón, Rachel L Cook
{"title":"Modeling dominant height with USGS 3DEP LiDAR to determine site index in even-aged loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern US","authors":"Vicent A Ribas-Costa, Aitor Gastón, Rachel L Cook","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpae034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate quantification and mapping of forest productivity are critical to understanding and managing forest ecosystems. Local LiDAR or photogrammetric surveys have been used to obtain reliable estimates of canopy heights, yet these acquisitions can entail substantial expenses. Therefore, we developed models using freely available US Geological survey (USGS) LiDAR data for prediction of dominant height to map site index across loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern US. We used 2017–2020 national USGS 3D Elevation Program LiDAR acquisitions and explored how different height percentiles, grid output resolutions, time difference between LiDAR and ground acquisitions, tree height, and dominant height definition affected the proposed model. We built the dominant height models using 1301 ground plots. The final regression model was constructed with the 95th percentile of the height distribution of the first returns above-ground and had values of R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 1.55 m, and RRMSE = 7.66 per cent at a 20-m pixel grid, yet all the examined percentile-resolution combinations were acceptable. No effect evidence was found for time difference when the flight was less than 4 months in advance or after the ground measurement, and it was also found independent of pulse density when this variable was lower than 9.5 pulses m−2. Using the recorded age of the plantations, we assessed the error propagation when translating dominant height to site index in two site index models, obtaining an RRMSE lower than 10 per cent in both. We found that USGS LiDAR acquisitions can be reliably used to map dominant height at a large scale, and consequently used to map forest productivity when age is known. This ability adds more value to a tool proven widely applicable in time and space and offers a great opportunity for stakeholders in different fields of use.","PeriodicalId":12342,"journal":{"name":"Forestry","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpae034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate quantification and mapping of forest productivity are critical to understanding and managing forest ecosystems. Local LiDAR or photogrammetric surveys have been used to obtain reliable estimates of canopy heights, yet these acquisitions can entail substantial expenses. Therefore, we developed models using freely available US Geological survey (USGS) LiDAR data for prediction of dominant height to map site index across loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern US. We used 2017–2020 national USGS 3D Elevation Program LiDAR acquisitions and explored how different height percentiles, grid output resolutions, time difference between LiDAR and ground acquisitions, tree height, and dominant height definition affected the proposed model. We built the dominant height models using 1301 ground plots. The final regression model was constructed with the 95th percentile of the height distribution of the first returns above-ground and had values of R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 1.55 m, and RRMSE = 7.66 per cent at a 20-m pixel grid, yet all the examined percentile-resolution combinations were acceptable. No effect evidence was found for time difference when the flight was less than 4 months in advance or after the ground measurement, and it was also found independent of pulse density when this variable was lower than 9.5 pulses m−2. Using the recorded age of the plantations, we assessed the error propagation when translating dominant height to site index in two site index models, obtaining an RRMSE lower than 10 per cent in both. We found that USGS LiDAR acquisitions can be reliably used to map dominant height at a large scale, and consequently used to map forest productivity when age is known. This ability adds more value to a tool proven widely applicable in time and space and offers a great opportunity for stakeholders in different fields of use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 USGS 3DEP LiDAR 建立优势高度模型,以确定美国东南部偶数树龄龙柏种植园的地点指数
准确量化和绘制森林生产力地图对于了解和管理森林生态系统至关重要。当地的激光雷达或摄影测量调查已被用于获得可靠的树冠高度估计值,但这些采集工作可能需要大量费用。因此,我们利用免费提供的美国地质调查局(USGS)激光雷达数据开发了模型,用于预测美国东南部龙柏(Pinus taeda L.)人工林的优势高度,以绘制林地指数图。我们使用了 2017-2020 年美国地质调查局国家三维高程计划 LiDAR 采集数据,并探索了不同的高度百分位数、网格输出分辨率、LiDAR 和地面采集之间的时间差、树高和优势高度定义对所建模型的影响。我们使用 1301 块地面地块建立了优势高度模型。最终的回归模型是以地面上首次回波高度分布的第 95 百分位数构建的,在 20 米像素网格下,R2 = 0.89,RMSE = 1.55 米,RRMSE = 7.66%,但所有检查过的百分位数-分辨率组合都是可以接受的。当飞行时间在地面测量之前或之后少于 4 个月时,没有发现时间差的影响证据;当脉冲密度低于 9.5 脉冲 m-2 时,也没有发现时间差的影响证据。利用记录的植被年龄,我们评估了在两个地点指数模型中将优势高度转换为地点指数时的误差传播情况,结果发现两个模型的 RRMSE 均低于 10%。我们发现,USGS LiDAR 采集数据可以可靠地用于绘制大尺度的优势高度图,从而在已知树龄的情况下用于绘制森林生产力图。这种能力为一种在时间和空间上被证明具有广泛适用性的工具增添了更多价值,并为不同使用领域的利益相关者提供了一个绝佳的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forestry
Forestry 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is inclusive of all subjects, geographical zones and study locations, including trees in urban environments, plantations and natural forests. We welcome papers that consider economic, environmental and social factors and, in particular, studies that take an integrated approach to sustainable management. In considering suitability for publication, attention is given to the originality of contributions and their likely impact on policy and practice, as well as their contribution to the development of knowledge. Special Issues - each year one edition of Forestry will be a Special Issue and will focus on one subject in detail; this will usually be by publication of the proceedings of an international meeting.
期刊最新文献
Testing treecbh in Central European forests: an R package for crown base height detection using high-resolution aerial laser-scanned data Impact of coarse woody debris on habitat use of two sympatric rodent species in the temperate Białowieża Forest Current understanding and future prospects for ash dieback disease with a focus on Britain Comparison of population genetic structure of Pinus mugo Turra forest stands in the Giant Mountains by analysis of nSSR molecular marker data Managing harvesting residues: a systematic review of management treatments around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1