Water throughout the green energy transition: Hydrosocial dimensions of coal, natural gas, and lithium

WIREs Water Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1002/wat2.1751
Joshua J. Cousins, Alida Cantor, Bethani Turley
{"title":"Water throughout the green energy transition: Hydrosocial dimensions of coal, natural gas, and lithium","authors":"Joshua J. Cousins, Alida Cantor, Bethani Turley","doi":"10.1002/wat2.1751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy transitions are reshaping hydrosocial relations. How they will be reshaped, however, depends on location and water's material relationship to other resources and industrial activities embedded within energy transitions. To highlight this, we focus on three different resources—coal, natural gas, and lithium—to signal how the water–energy nexus will be reworked in a transition away from fossil fuels. We examine the water–coal nexus as an example of a resource relationship that is transitioning <jats:italic>out</jats:italic>, or that is being moved away from in the green energy transition. Natural gas represents the “bridge fuel” used <jats:italic>through</jats:italic> the transition. Lithium illustrates a resource <jats:italic>inside</jats:italic> the green transition, as it is a fundamental material for green technologies <jats:italic>in</jats:italic> the transition to a low‐carbon future. Coal, natural gas, and lithium each have their own material impacts to water resources that stem from their industrial lifecycle and different implications for communities shaped by coal, natural gas, and lithium activities. To explore this, we review each of these resources' connection to water, their legal and regulatory dimensions, and their impact on communities and water justice. We argue that the energy transition is also a hydrosocial transition that will create uneven water‐related benefits and burdens. To maximize sustainability and equity, efforts to decarbonize energy systems must examine the localized, place‐based hydrosocial relations that differentially affect communities.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Engineering Water &gt; Planning Water</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Human Water &gt; Water Governance</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Human Water &gt; Rights to Water</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501223,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Water","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy transitions are reshaping hydrosocial relations. How they will be reshaped, however, depends on location and water's material relationship to other resources and industrial activities embedded within energy transitions. To highlight this, we focus on three different resources—coal, natural gas, and lithium—to signal how the water–energy nexus will be reworked in a transition away from fossil fuels. We examine the water–coal nexus as an example of a resource relationship that is transitioning out, or that is being moved away from in the green energy transition. Natural gas represents the “bridge fuel” used through the transition. Lithium illustrates a resource inside the green transition, as it is a fundamental material for green technologies in the transition to a low‐carbon future. Coal, natural gas, and lithium each have their own material impacts to water resources that stem from their industrial lifecycle and different implications for communities shaped by coal, natural gas, and lithium activities. To explore this, we review each of these resources' connection to water, their legal and regulatory dimensions, and their impact on communities and water justice. We argue that the energy transition is also a hydrosocial transition that will create uneven water‐related benefits and burdens. To maximize sustainability and equity, efforts to decarbonize energy systems must examine the localized, place‐based hydrosocial relations that differentially affect communities.This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Planning Water Human Water > Water Governance Human Water > Rights to Water
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水贯穿绿色能源转型:煤炭、天然气和锂的水社会层面
能源转型正在重塑水社会关系。然而,如何重塑水社会关系取决于地点以及水与能源转型中其他资源和工业活动的物质关系。为了突出这一点,我们重点关注三种不同的资源--煤、天然气和锂,以揭示在摆脱化石燃料的转型过程中,水与能源的关系将如何被重塑。我们以水与煤的关系为例,说明在绿色能源转型过程中,水与煤之间的资源关系正在发生转变。天然气是过渡过程中使用的 "桥梁燃料"。锂是绿色转型中的一种资源,因为在向低碳未来转型的过程中,锂是绿色技术的基本材料。煤炭、天然气和锂在其工业生命周期中对水资源都有各自的实质性影响,对煤炭、天然气和锂活动所影响的社区也有不同的影响。为了探讨这个问题,我们回顾了每种资源与水资源的联系、它们的法律和监管层面,以及它们对社区和水正义的影响。我们认为,能源转型也是一种水社会转型,将造成与水相关的利益和负担的不均衡。为了最大限度地实现可持续性和公平性,能源系统去碳化的努力必须研究对社区产生不同影响的本地化、基于地方的水社会关系:工程水> 规划水 人类水> 水治理 人类水> 水权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anishinaabek responsibilities and relationships are demonstrated in N'bi (Water) Declarations Food for fish: Challenges and opportunities for quantifying foodscapes in river networks Immunity through technification? A critical review of water governance discourses in Tunisia Optimization methods in water system operation Water on the mind: Mapping behavioral and psychological research on water security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1