Optimization of resource allocation in 5G networks: A network slicing approach with hybrid NOMA for enhanced uRLLC and eMBB coexistence

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC International Journal of Communication Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1002/dac.5928
Rebba Chandra Sekhar, Poonam Singh
{"title":"Optimization of resource allocation in 5G networks: A network slicing approach with hybrid NOMA for enhanced uRLLC and eMBB coexistence","authors":"Rebba Chandra Sekhar, Poonam Singh","doi":"10.1002/dac.5928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryTraditional Orthogonal Multiple Access (OMA) and spectrum sharing methods struggle to provide the diverse quality of service (QoS) demands for enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), ultra‐reliable low latency communications (uRLLC), and massive machine type communications (mMTC) leading to suboptimal performance and service quality degradation. Single‐carrier‐non‐orthogonal multiple access (SC‐NOMA) appears to be a more optimized solution. It can serve multiple users simultaneously on the same time‐frequency resources. This approach offers both enhanced spectrum efficiency and meets the QoS requirements for the coexistence of eMBB, uRLLC, and mMTC. However, SC‐NOMA has some drawbacks. Decoding a user's signal involves a complex successive interference cancellation (SIC) process that gets harder with more users causing delays and errors. Additionally, strong user signals can interfere with weaker ones, limiting the number of users per channel. In order to overcome the drawbacks associated with OMA and SC‐NOMA, this paper introduces a new method called user‐paired NOMA (hybrid NOMA). Hybrid NOMA adopts a strategic approach, employing two user pairing techniques: near‐far/far‐near (NF‐FN) and near‐near/far‐far (NN‐FF). NF‐FN pairing prioritizes users with similar signal strengths but different distances from the base station. This minimizes interference for the weaker user during SIC. NN‐FF pairing, on the other hand, groups users with similar signal strengths and proximity. This approach further simplifies SIC and minimizes potential interference altogether. The simulation results demonstrate trade‐offs between eMBB and uRLLC performance. OMA suffers with dedicated resource allocation, while SC‐NOMA balances performance but experiences interference. NN‐FF prioritizes eMBB and offers best latency, while NF‐FN prioritizes uRLLC with high spectral efficiency but suffers from higher latency. Finally, by providing a thorough grasp of how hybrid NOMA resource allocation works to improve the performance of various use cases, this research makes a significant contribution to the field of 5G spectrum optimization.","PeriodicalId":13946,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryTraditional Orthogonal Multiple Access (OMA) and spectrum sharing methods struggle to provide the diverse quality of service (QoS) demands for enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), ultra‐reliable low latency communications (uRLLC), and massive machine type communications (mMTC) leading to suboptimal performance and service quality degradation. Single‐carrier‐non‐orthogonal multiple access (SC‐NOMA) appears to be a more optimized solution. It can serve multiple users simultaneously on the same time‐frequency resources. This approach offers both enhanced spectrum efficiency and meets the QoS requirements for the coexistence of eMBB, uRLLC, and mMTC. However, SC‐NOMA has some drawbacks. Decoding a user's signal involves a complex successive interference cancellation (SIC) process that gets harder with more users causing delays and errors. Additionally, strong user signals can interfere with weaker ones, limiting the number of users per channel. In order to overcome the drawbacks associated with OMA and SC‐NOMA, this paper introduces a new method called user‐paired NOMA (hybrid NOMA). Hybrid NOMA adopts a strategic approach, employing two user pairing techniques: near‐far/far‐near (NF‐FN) and near‐near/far‐far (NN‐FF). NF‐FN pairing prioritizes users with similar signal strengths but different distances from the base station. This minimizes interference for the weaker user during SIC. NN‐FF pairing, on the other hand, groups users with similar signal strengths and proximity. This approach further simplifies SIC and minimizes potential interference altogether. The simulation results demonstrate trade‐offs between eMBB and uRLLC performance. OMA suffers with dedicated resource allocation, while SC‐NOMA balances performance but experiences interference. NN‐FF prioritizes eMBB and offers best latency, while NF‐FN prioritizes uRLLC with high spectral efficiency but suffers from higher latency. Finally, by providing a thorough grasp of how hybrid NOMA resource allocation works to improve the performance of various use cases, this research makes a significant contribution to the field of 5G spectrum optimization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化 5G 网络中的资源分配:采用混合 NOMA 的网络切片方法,增强 uRLLC 和 eMBB 的共存性
摘要传统的正交多址接入(OMA)和频谱共享方法难以满足增强型移动宽带(eMBB)、超可靠低延迟通信(uRLLC)和大规模机器型通信(mMTC)的各种服务质量(QoS)需求,导致性能不理想和服务质量下降。单载波非正交多址接入(SC-NOMA)似乎是一种更优化的解决方案。它可以在相同的时频资源上同时为多个用户提供服务。这种方法既能提高频谱效率,又能满足 eMBB、uRLLC 和 mMTC 共存的 QoS 要求。不过,SC-NOMA 也有一些缺点。用户信号的解码涉及复杂的连续干扰消除(SIC)过程,用户越多,难度越大,从而导致延迟和错误。此外,强用户信号会干扰弱用户信号,从而限制了每个信道的用户数量。为了克服与 OMA 和 SC-NOMA 相关的缺点,本文介绍了一种称为用户配对 NOMA(混合 NOMA)的新方法。混合 NOMA 采用战略方法,采用两种用户配对技术:近远/远近(NF-FN)和近远/远近(NN-FF)。NF-FN 配对优先考虑信号强度相似但与基站距离不同的用户。这可以最大限度地减少 SIC 期间对较弱用户的干扰。另一方面,NN-FF 配对则将信号强度相似且距离较近的用户分组。这种方法进一步简化了 SIC,并将潜在干扰降至最低。仿真结果表明了 eMBB 和 uRLLC 性能之间的权衡。OMA 会受到专用资源分配的影响,而 SC-NOMA 则能平衡性能,但会受到干扰。NN-FF 优先考虑 eMBB 并提供最佳延迟,而 NF-FN 则优先考虑具有高频谱效率的 uRLLC,但延迟较高。最后,通过全面掌握混合 NOMA 资源分配如何改善各种用例的性能,本研究为 5G 频谱优化领域做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
323
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Communication Systems provides a forum for R&D, open to researchers from all types of institutions and organisations worldwide, aimed at the increasingly important area of communication technology. The Journal''s emphasis is particularly on the issues impacting behaviour at the system, service and management levels. Published twelve times a year, it provides coverage of advances that have a significant potential to impact the immense technical and commercial opportunities in the communications sector. The International Journal of Communication Systems strives to select a balance of contributions that promotes technical innovation allied to practical relevance across the range of system types and issues. The Journal addresses both public communication systems (Telecommunication, mobile, Internet, and Cable TV) and private systems (Intranets, enterprise networks, LANs, MANs, WANs). The following key areas and issues are regularly covered: -Transmission/Switching/Distribution technologies (ATM, SDH, TCP/IP, routers, DSL, cable modems, VoD, VoIP, WDM, etc.) -System control, network/service management -Network and Internet protocols and standards -Client-server, distributed and Web-based communication systems -Broadband and multimedia systems and applications, with a focus on increased service variety and interactivity -Trials of advanced systems and services; their implementation and evaluation -Novel concepts and improvements in technique; their theoretical basis and performance analysis using measurement/testing, modelling and simulation -Performance evaluation issues and methods.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of optimal routing in heterogeneous wireless sensor network with multi‐channel Media Access Control protocol using Enhanced Henry Gas Solubility Optimizer Collision detection and mitigation based on optimization and Kronecker recurrent neural network in WSN Dual‐port circular patch antenna array: Enhancing gain and minimizing cross‐polarization for mm‐wave 5G networks Performance enhancement in hybrid SDN using advanced deep learning with multi‐objective optimization frameworks under heterogeneous environments Enhanced capacitated next controller placement in software‐defined network with modified capacity constraint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1