Experience matters in special educators' preparation in intervention planning for autistic students

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1111/1471-3802.12704
Maria L. Hugh, Stefan Horbanczuk, Angel Fettig, Jill Locke
{"title":"Experience matters in special educators' preparation in intervention planning for autistic students","authors":"Maria L. Hugh, Stefan Horbanczuk, Angel Fettig, Jill Locke","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.12704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educators struggle to select evidence‐based practices (EBPs) for autistic students, which is an important skill to develop for special educators in training (SETs). To examine how these SETs learn and begin to make decisions about instructional practices for autistic students to attain their goals, we interviewed and surveyed 11 SETs before and after completing a university course on evidence‐based practices for autistic students. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive compilation of research‐based factors that influence behaviour change, to guide qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis to identify factors that influenced SETs' decision difficulty and intention to implement instructional plans. At the beginning of the course, most SETs described a lack of familiarity, weak intentions and surface understanding of factors. At the end of the course, SETs described and reported less difficulty in intervention planning and improved knowledge of EBP, but this was not statistically significant. We discuss important individual differences related to their difficulty, consideration of collaborative and environmental factors and intentions to implement their plans, which often corresponded with their reports of applied experience. Future directions for the pre‐service preparation of special educators service autistic students are shared.","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educators struggle to select evidence‐based practices (EBPs) for autistic students, which is an important skill to develop for special educators in training (SETs). To examine how these SETs learn and begin to make decisions about instructional practices for autistic students to attain their goals, we interviewed and surveyed 11 SETs before and after completing a university course on evidence‐based practices for autistic students. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive compilation of research‐based factors that influence behaviour change, to guide qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis to identify factors that influenced SETs' decision difficulty and intention to implement instructional plans. At the beginning of the course, most SETs described a lack of familiarity, weak intentions and surface understanding of factors. At the end of the course, SETs described and reported less difficulty in intervention planning and improved knowledge of EBP, but this was not statistically significant. We discuss important individual differences related to their difficulty, consideration of collaborative and environmental factors and intentions to implement their plans, which often corresponded with their reports of applied experience. Future directions for the pre‐service preparation of special educators service autistic students are shared.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊教育工作者在为自闭症学生制定干预计划的准备工作中,经验很重要
教育工作者很难为自闭症学生选择循证实践(EBPs),而这是接受培训的特殊教育工作者(SETs)需要培养的一项重要技能。为了研究这些接受培训的特殊教育工作者如何学习并开始为自闭症学生的教学实践做出决策,以实现他们的目标,我们对 11 名接受培训的特殊教育工作者进行了访谈,并调查了他们在完成关于自闭症学生循证实践的大学课程前后的情况。我们使用理论领域框架(TDF)来指导定性和定量数据的收集和分析,该框架全面汇编了基于研究的影响行为改变的因素,以确定影响 SETs 决策难度和实施教学计划意向的因素。在课程开始时,大多数 SET 表示对各种因素不熟悉、意向不强、理解肤浅。在课程结束时,SETs 描述并报告在干预计划方面遇到的困难减少了,对 EBP 的了解增加了,但这并不具有统计学意义。我们讨论了与他们的困难、对合作和环境因素的考虑以及实施计划的意图有关的重要个体差异,这些差异往往与他们对应用经验的报告相符。我们还分享了特殊教育工作者服务自闭症学生的职前准备的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Parents' lived experiences regarding the decision‐making process on reasonable accommodations for their child with SEN—An IPA analysis Trends in instructional technologies used in education of people with special needs due to intellectual disability and autism Teachers' relational competence towards students with neurodevelopmental symptoms: A microscopic relational analysis Theory is inclusive, practice is integrative? Discourses on inclusion in the education community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1