Experience in Assessing Damage from Soil and Land Degradation Agriculture of the Volgograd Region

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two methods for assessing damage from the degradation of soils and agricultural lands located in the Kalachevsky district of the Volgograd Region. The amount of damage from soil and land degradation was calculated by the “Methodology for determining the amount of damage from soil and land degradation” (1994) and the cost of restoration (reclamation) of degraded soils was determined using the SmetaWizard estimate program (version 4.1.3). It was established that the most significant contribution to the total amount of damage from soil and land degradation (175 573 000 rubles or 64 955 rubles/ha) was made by the increase in the share of exchangeable sodium in soils (147 424 528 rubles or 54 541 rubles/ha), which is due to the development of the process of alkalinization in the soils of the studied agricultural sector in the region. This degradation process, which is harmful to the agricultural use of soils and lands, was found in areas that comprise 52% of the total farm area. This indicator’s significant damage is also associated with extended periods of restoration (reclamation) work, 4 years. The cost of reclamation work amounted to 11 647 353 rubles or 4309 rub./ha. The maximum contribution (78%) to this was made by damage from soil organic matter losses (the amount of damage was 9 131 525 rubles or 3378 rubles/ha). The significant difference in the total values of the environmental and economic assessment of soil degradation and the land of the Donskoye agricultural enterprise in the Kalachevsky district, calculated in various ways, is associated with the methodological features of this assessment: the assessment of damage from degradation by the “Methodology …” (1994) is a stricter approach than estimating the cost of reclamation (restoration) measures. Thus, soils may be degraded compared with a standard (considered when assessing damage), but this degradation is “insufficient” to justify reclamation.