Evaluating the Causal Effect of Type 2 Diabetes on Alzheimer’s Disease Using Large-Scale Genetic Data

D. Liu, A. Baranova, Fuquan Zhang
{"title":"Evaluating the Causal Effect of Type 2 Diabetes on Alzheimer’s Disease Using Large-Scale Genetic Data","authors":"D. Liu, A. Baranova, Fuquan Zhang","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2024.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has a high comorbidity with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, there is still some controversy over whether T2D has a causal impact on AD at present.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>We aimed to reveal whether T2D has a causal effect on AD using large-scale genetic data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Firstly, we performed a primary two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess the potential causal effects of T2D on AD. For this analysis, we used the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) T2D (T2D1, including 80,154 cases and 853,816 controls) and AD (AD1, including 111,326 cases and 677,663 controls) datasets. Additionally, we performed a validation MR analysis using two largely overlapping-sample datasets from FinnGen, including T2D (T2D2, including 57,698 cases and 308,252 controls) and AD (AD2, including 13,393 cases and 363,884 controls). In all MR analyses, the inverse variance-weighted method was used as the primary analysis method, supplemented by the weighted-median and MR-Egger techniques.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In the primary analysis, we found that T2D was not associated with the risk of AD (OR: 0.98, CI: 0.95–1.01, P=0.241). Similarly, no significant association was detected in the validation MR analysis (OR: 0.97, CI: 0.64–1.47, P=0.884).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings provide robust evidence that T2D does not have a causal impact on AD. Future studies need to further explore the effect of T2D on the non-AD components of the dementia phenotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has a high comorbidity with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, there is still some controversy over whether T2D has a causal impact on AD at present.

Objectives

We aimed to reveal whether T2D has a causal effect on AD using large-scale genetic data.

Methods

Firstly, we performed a primary two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess the potential causal effects of T2D on AD. For this analysis, we used the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) T2D (T2D1, including 80,154 cases and 853,816 controls) and AD (AD1, including 111,326 cases and 677,663 controls) datasets. Additionally, we performed a validation MR analysis using two largely overlapping-sample datasets from FinnGen, including T2D (T2D2, including 57,698 cases and 308,252 controls) and AD (AD2, including 13,393 cases and 363,884 controls). In all MR analyses, the inverse variance-weighted method was used as the primary analysis method, supplemented by the weighted-median and MR-Egger techniques.

Results

In the primary analysis, we found that T2D was not associated with the risk of AD (OR: 0.98, CI: 0.95–1.01, P=0.241). Similarly, no significant association was detected in the validation MR analysis (OR: 0.97, CI: 0.64–1.47, P=0.884).

Conclusion

Our findings provide robust evidence that T2D does not have a causal impact on AD. Future studies need to further explore the effect of T2D on the non-AD components of the dementia phenotype.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用大规模遗传数据评估 2 型糖尿病对阿尔茨海默病的因果效应
背景阿尔茨海默病(AD)与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的合并率很高。方法首先,我们进行了一次主要的双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以评估 T2D 对 AD 的潜在因果效应。在这项分析中,我们使用了现有最大的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)T2D(T2D1,包括 80154 个病例和 853816 个对照)和 AD(AD1,包括 111326 个病例和 677663 个对照)数据集。此外,我们还使用 FinnGen 的两个基本重叠的样本数据集进行了验证 MR 分析,包括 T2D(T2D2,包括 57,698 例病例和 308,252 例对照)和 AD(AD2,包括 13,393 例病例和 363,884 例对照)。在所有 MR 分析中,均以反方差加权法作为主要分析方法,并辅以加权中值法和 MR-Egger 技术。结果在主要分析中,我们发现 T2D 与 AD 风险无关(OR:0.98,CI:0.95-1.01,P=0.241)。同样,在验证性 MR 分析中也没有发现明显的关联(OR:0.97,CI:0.64-1.47,P=0.884)。未来的研究需要进一步探讨T2D对痴呆表型中非AD成分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
期刊最新文献
Association between Cognitive Reserve Indicator and Chronic Disease-Free Survival: A Large Community-Based Longitudinal Study Phase 1 Studies of the Anti-Tau Monoclonal Antibody JNJ-63733657 in Healthy Participants and Participants with Alzheimer’s Disease Roles of TREM2 in the Pathological Mechanism and the Therapeutic Strategies of Alzheimer’s Disease Development and Validation the Mobile Toolbox (MTB) Spelling Test Correlates of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Black American Men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1