Resolution evaluation of the satellite altimetric gravity anomaly models with shipborne gravity data over the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctica (44–52° E)

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Prospecting Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1111/1365-2478.13577
Chunguo Yang, Linjiang Qin, Weifeng Ding, Jinyao Gao, Guochao Wu
{"title":"Resolution evaluation of the satellite altimetric gravity anomaly models with shipborne gravity data over the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctica (44–52° E)","authors":"Chunguo Yang,&nbsp;Linjiang Qin,&nbsp;Weifeng Ding,&nbsp;Jinyao Gao,&nbsp;Guochao Wu","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.13577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several satellite gravity anomaly models are freely available to calculate the free-air gravity anomaly in areas where shipborne gravity measurements are scarce. Two models produced by the Technical University of Denmark (DTU17) and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIOv32.1), respectively, were selected to compute the free-air anomalies over the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctica. A statistical comparison analysis was performed to evaluate the resolution of satellite gravity anomaly models by comparing them with the shipborne surveying date. The radially averaged energy spectra of free-air anomaly from different sources were calculated and compared over two selected regions to further evaluate the reliability of the data derived from satellite gravity anomaly models. The satellite gravity anomaly models have a better resolution in the ocean basin than in the area near the continental shelf. The comparison analysis revealed that the precision of both DTU17 and SIOv32.1 is close to the shipborne gravity data, but on average, SIOv32.1 is a little bit better than DTU17. The spectral analysis showed that the shipborne measurements may provide higher resolution than the satellite gravity anomaly model at wavelengths shorter than 20 km, and the free-air data derived from SIOv32.1 have better resolution than the one from DTU17. These shipborne datasets will provide contributions for the updates of the Antarctic gravity anomaly and enable new high-resolution combined Earth gravity models to be derived in Antarctica.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several satellite gravity anomaly models are freely available to calculate the free-air gravity anomaly in areas where shipborne gravity measurements are scarce. Two models produced by the Technical University of Denmark (DTU17) and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIOv32.1), respectively, were selected to compute the free-air anomalies over the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctica. A statistical comparison analysis was performed to evaluate the resolution of satellite gravity anomaly models by comparing them with the shipborne surveying date. The radially averaged energy spectra of free-air anomaly from different sources were calculated and compared over two selected regions to further evaluate the reliability of the data derived from satellite gravity anomaly models. The satellite gravity anomaly models have a better resolution in the ocean basin than in the area near the continental shelf. The comparison analysis revealed that the precision of both DTU17 and SIOv32.1 is close to the shipborne gravity data, but on average, SIOv32.1 is a little bit better than DTU17. The spectral analysis showed that the shipborne measurements may provide higher resolution than the satellite gravity anomaly model at wavelengths shorter than 20 km, and the free-air data derived from SIOv32.1 have better resolution than the one from DTU17. These shipborne datasets will provide contributions for the updates of the Antarctic gravity anomaly and enable new high-resolution combined Earth gravity models to be derived in Antarctica.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用南极洲东部宇宙海(东经 44-52°) 上的船载重力数据对卫星测高重力异常模型进行分辨率评估
在缺乏船载重力测量的地区,有几种卫星重力异常模型可免费用于计算自由空气重力异常。我们选择了分别由丹麦技术大学(DTU17)和斯克里普斯海洋学研究所(SIOv32.1)制作的两个模型来计算南极洲东部宇宙海的自由空气异常。通过与船载勘测日期进行比较,对卫星重力异常模型的分辨率进行了统计比较分析。计算并比较了两个选定区域内不同来源的自由空气异常的径向平均能量谱,以进一步评估卫星重力异常模型得出的数据的可靠性。卫星重力异常模型在海盆中的分辨率高于大陆架附近区域。对比分析表明,DTU17 和 SIOv32.1 的精度与船载重力数据接近,但平均而言,SIOv32.1 略好于 DTU17。光谱分析显示,在波长短于 20 千米处,船载测量数据可能比卫星重力异常模型提供更高的分辨率,而 SIOv32.1 导出的自由空气数据比 DTU17 的分辨率更高。这些船载数据集将为更新南极重力异常做出贡献,并能在南极推导出新的高分辨率地球重力综合模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Simultaneous inversion of four physical parameters of hydrate reservoir for high accuracy porosity estimation A mollifier approach to seismic data representation Analytic solutions for effective elastic moduli of isotropic solids containing oblate spheroid pores with critical porosity An efficient pseudoelastic pure P-mode wave equation and the implementation of the free surface boundary condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1