{"title":"On odd-normal numbers","authors":"Malabika Pramanik, Junqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s13226-024-00642-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A real number <i>x</i> is considered normal in an integer base <span>\\(b \\geqslant 2\\)</span> if its digit expansion in this base is “equitable”, ensuring that for each <span>\\(k \\geqslant 1\\)</span>, every ordered sequence of <i>k</i> digits from <span>\\(\\{0, 1, \\ldots , b-1\\}\\)</span> occurs in the digit expansion of <i>x</i> with the same limiting frequency. Borel’s classical result [4] asserts that Lebesgue-almost every <span>\\(x \\in {\\mathbb {R}}\\)</span> is normal in every base <span>\\(b \\geqslant 2\\)</span>. This paper serves as a case study of the measure-theoretic properties of Lebesgue-null sets containing numbers that are normal only in certain bases. We consider the set <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> of reals that are normal in odd bases but not in even ones. This set has full Hausdorff dimension [30] but zero Fourier dimension. The latter condition means that <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> cannot support a probability measure whose Fourier transform has power decay at infinity. Our main result is that <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> supports a Rajchman measure <span>\\(\\mu \\)</span>, whose Fourier transform <span>\\({\\widehat{\\mu }}(\\xi )\\)</span> approaches 0 as <span>\\(|\\xi | \\rightarrow \\infty \\)</span> by definiton, albeit slower than any negative power of <span>\\(|\\xi |\\)</span>. Moreover, the decay rate of <span>\\({\\widehat{\\mu }}\\)</span> is essentially optimal, subject to the constraints of its support. The methods draw inspiration from the number-theoretic results of Schmidt [38] and a construction of Lyons [24]. As a consequence, <span>\\(\\mathscr {N}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span> emerges as a set of multiplicity, in the sense of Fourier analysis. This addresses a question posed by Kahane and Salem [17] in the special case of <span>\\({\\mathscr {N}}({\\mathscr {O}}, {\\mathscr {E}})\\)</span>.</p>","PeriodicalId":501427,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-024-00642-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A real number x is considered normal in an integer base \(b \geqslant 2\) if its digit expansion in this base is “equitable”, ensuring that for each \(k \geqslant 1\), every ordered sequence of k digits from \(\{0, 1, \ldots , b-1\}\) occurs in the digit expansion of x with the same limiting frequency. Borel’s classical result [4] asserts that Lebesgue-almost every \(x \in {\mathbb {R}}\) is normal in every base \(b \geqslant 2\). This paper serves as a case study of the measure-theoretic properties of Lebesgue-null sets containing numbers that are normal only in certain bases. We consider the set \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) of reals that are normal in odd bases but not in even ones. This set has full Hausdorff dimension [30] but zero Fourier dimension. The latter condition means that \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) cannot support a probability measure whose Fourier transform has power decay at infinity. Our main result is that \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) supports a Rajchman measure \(\mu \), whose Fourier transform \({\widehat{\mu }}(\xi )\) approaches 0 as \(|\xi | \rightarrow \infty \) by definiton, albeit slower than any negative power of \(|\xi |\). Moreover, the decay rate of \({\widehat{\mu }}\) is essentially optimal, subject to the constraints of its support. The methods draw inspiration from the number-theoretic results of Schmidt [38] and a construction of Lyons [24]. As a consequence, \(\mathscr {N}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\) emerges as a set of multiplicity, in the sense of Fourier analysis. This addresses a question posed by Kahane and Salem [17] in the special case of \({\mathscr {N}}({\mathscr {O}}, {\mathscr {E}})\).