A Simple Scoring System for Identifying Favorable Neurologic Outcomes Among Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients With Asystole.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Annals of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.016
Hanna Park, Sang-Min Kim, Hyojeong Kwon, Dongju Kim, Youn-Jung Kim, Won Young Kim
{"title":"A Simple Scoring System for Identifying Favorable Neurologic Outcomes Among Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients With Asystole.","authors":"Hanna Park, Sang-Min Kim, Hyojeong Kwon, Dongju Kim, Youn-Jung Kim, Won Young Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Asystole is the most common initial rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) but indicates a low likelihood of neurologic recovery. This study aimed to develop a novel scoring system to be easily applied at the time of emergency department arrival for identifying favorable neurologic outcomes in OHCA survivors with an asystole rhythm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis based on a previously collected nationwide database, targeting nontraumatic adult OHCA patients aged ≥18 years with an asystole rhythm who achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) between January 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was a favorable neurologic outcome defined as Cerebral Performance Categories scores of 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. A prediction model was developed through multivariable logistic regression analysis in a derivation cohort in the form of a scoring system (WBC-ASystole). The performance and calibration of the model were tested using an internal validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,803 OHCA patients with survival to hospital admission, 6,322 had asystole, and 285 (4.5%) achieved good neurologic outcomes. Factors associated with favorable outcomes included age, witness arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, time from call to hospital arrival, and out-of-hospital ROSC achievement. The WBC-ASystole score, totaling 11 points, exhibited a predictive performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.83) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.83) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. After categorizing patients into 3 groups based on probability for good neurologic outcomes, the sensitivity and specificity were as follows: 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.10) for the very low predicted probability group (WBC-ASystole ≤2), 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.89) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.55) for the low predicted probability group (WBC-ASystole 3 to 4), and 0.36 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.39) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.93) for fair predicted probability group (WBC-ASystole≥5), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although external validation studies must be performed, among OHCA patients with asystole, the WBC-ASystole scoring system may identify those patients who are likely to have a favorable neurologic outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: Asystole is the most common initial rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) but indicates a low likelihood of neurologic recovery. This study aimed to develop a novel scoring system to be easily applied at the time of emergency department arrival for identifying favorable neurologic outcomes in OHCA survivors with an asystole rhythm.

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis based on a previously collected nationwide database, targeting nontraumatic adult OHCA patients aged ≥18 years with an asystole rhythm who achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) between January 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was a favorable neurologic outcome defined as Cerebral Performance Categories scores of 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. A prediction model was developed through multivariable logistic regression analysis in a derivation cohort in the form of a scoring system (WBC-ASystole). The performance and calibration of the model were tested using an internal validation cohort.

Results: Among 19,803 OHCA patients with survival to hospital admission, 6,322 had asystole, and 285 (4.5%) achieved good neurologic outcomes. Factors associated with favorable outcomes included age, witness arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, time from call to hospital arrival, and out-of-hospital ROSC achievement. The WBC-ASystole score, totaling 11 points, exhibited a predictive performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.83) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.83) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. After categorizing patients into 3 groups based on probability for good neurologic outcomes, the sensitivity and specificity were as follows: 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.10) for the very low predicted probability group (WBC-ASystole ≤2), 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.89) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.55) for the low predicted probability group (WBC-ASystole 3 to 4), and 0.36 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.39) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.93) for fair predicted probability group (WBC-ASystole≥5), respectively.

Conclusions: Although external validation studies must be performed, among OHCA patients with asystole, the WBC-ASystole scoring system may identify those patients who are likely to have a favorable neurologic outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在院外心脏骤停伴有心搏骤停的患者中识别有利神经系统预后的简单评分系统。
研究目的:心搏骤停是院外心脏骤停(OHCA)最常见的初始心律,但神经功能恢复的可能性较低。本研究旨在开发一套新颖的评分系统,以便在急诊科到达患者时轻松应用,从而确定伴有心搏骤停心律的 OHCA 幸存者的良好神经功能预后:本研究是基于先前收集的全国性数据库进行的二次分析,对象是2016年1月至2020年12月期间,年龄≥18岁、心律骤停并实现自主循环恢复(ROSC)的非创伤性成人OHCA患者。主要结果是良好的神经系统预后,定义为出院时脑功能分类评分为 1 分或 2 分。通过对衍生队列进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以评分系统(WBC-ASystole)的形式建立了一个预测模型。该模型的性能和校准通过内部验证队列进行了测试:结果:在 19803 名入院后存活的 OHCA 患者中,6322 人出现了心搏骤停,285 人(4.5%)获得了良好的神经功能预后。与良好预后相关的因素包括年龄、目击者心跳骤停、旁观者心肺复苏、从呼救到到达医院的时间以及院外ROSC成功率。WBC-ASystole 评分共 11 分,在推导队列和验证队列中具有预测性,接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.80(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.76 至 0.83)和 0.79(95% CI 0.74 至 0.83)。根据神经系统良好预后的概率将患者分为三组后,灵敏度和特异性如下:极低预测概率组(WBC-ASystole ≤2)的灵敏度为 0.98(95% CI 0.97 至 0.99),特异度为 0.09(95% CI 0.09 至 0.10);低预测概率组(WBC-ASystole ≤2)的灵敏度为 0.85(95% CI 0.82 至 0.89),特异度为 0.54(95% CI 0.53 至 0.55)。低预测概率组(WBC-ASstole 3 至 4)分别为 0.36(95% CI 0.34 至 0.39)和 0.93(95% CI 0.92 至 0.93):尽管必须进行外部验证研究,但在伴有心搏骤停的 OHCA 患者中,WBC-ASystole 评分系统可以识别出哪些患者有可能获得良好的神经系统预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Tube Thoracostomy Should Remain the Preferred Intervention for Traumatic Hemothorax. Does Routine Screening for Child Abuse Decrease Subsequent Abuse? One Big Step Forward, Two Small Steps Back. Table of Contents Masthead Global Research Highlights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1