Bladder Tumor-Focused Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Clinical Outcomes of a Phase I Dose Escalation Study.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2317
Shaista Hafeez, Karole Warren-Oseni, Kelly Jones, Kabir Mohammed, Amir El-Ghzal, David Dearnaley, Victoria Harris, Atia Khan, Pardeep Kumar, Susan Lalondrelle, Fiona McDonald, Melissa Tan, Karen Thomas, Alan Thompson, Helen A McNair, Vibeke N Hansen, Robert A Huddart
{"title":"Bladder Tumor-Focused Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Clinical Outcomes of a Phase I Dose Escalation Study.","authors":"Shaista Hafeez, Karole Warren-Oseni, Kelly Jones, Kabir Mohammed, Amir El-Ghzal, David Dearnaley, Victoria Harris, Atia Khan, Pardeep Kumar, Susan Lalondrelle, Fiona McDonald, Melissa Tan, Karen Thomas, Alan Thompson, Helen A McNair, Vibeke N Hansen, Robert A Huddart","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We determine the maximum tolerated tumor-focused dose (MTD) for the radical treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer enabled by image guided adaptive radiation therapy and long-term clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Fifty-nine patients with T2 to T4aN0M0 unifocal urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer suitable for daily radical radiation therapy were recruited prospectively to an ethics-approved protocol (NCT01124682). The uninvolved bladder (PTV<sub>bladder</sub>) was planned to 52 Gy in 32 fractions. The bladder tumor (PTV<sub>tumor</sub>) was planned to an assigned dose level of 68, 70, 72, or 74 Gy. If organ at risk dose constraints were violated, then PTV<sub>tumor</sub> was planned to 64 Gy. Dose level allocation was determined by concurrent toxicity assessment of all previous patients recruited. Acute toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0; late toxicity was evaluated using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The MTD was predefined as the highest dose level with an estimated probability of ≤ 15% ≥ G3 late toxicity and an observed rate of <50% acute G3 and <10% acute G4 toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients were assigned to 68 Gy, of whom 6 were planned to 64 Gy; 29 patients were assigned to 70 Gy of whom 1 was planned to 68 Gy, 2 patients were assigned and planned to 72 Gy; no patients were assigned to 74 Gy. Three patients did not complete the treatment as planned, of whom only 1 patient stopped treatment because dose-limiting toxicity occurred. The MTD was 70 Gy. Acute genito-urinary and gastro-intestinal G3 acute toxicity was seen in 19% and 7% of patients, respectively. No acute G4 genito-urinary or gastro-intestinal toxicity was seen. Late toxicity (any) G3 and G4 was seen in 14% and 2% of patients, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 58% (95% CI, 44%-71%). The bladder preservation rate was 89% (95% CI, 88%-96%) with 6 patients not retaining native bladder function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bladder tumor-focused dose escalation to 70 Gy using image guided adaptive radiation therapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. This dose level has been evaluated in a phase II randomized control trial (RAIDER NCT02447549).</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":"165-175"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We determine the maximum tolerated tumor-focused dose (MTD) for the radical treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer enabled by image guided adaptive radiation therapy and long-term clinical outcomes.

Methods and materials: Fifty-nine patients with T2 to T4aN0M0 unifocal urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer suitable for daily radical radiation therapy were recruited prospectively to an ethics-approved protocol (NCT01124682). The uninvolved bladder (PTVbladder) was planned to 52 Gy in 32 fractions. The bladder tumor (PTVtumor) was planned to an assigned dose level of 68, 70, 72, or 74 Gy. If organ at risk dose constraints were violated, then PTVtumor was planned to 64 Gy. Dose level allocation was determined by concurrent toxicity assessment of all previous patients recruited. Acute toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0; late toxicity was evaluated using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The MTD was predefined as the highest dose level with an estimated probability of ≤ 15% ≥ G3 late toxicity and an observed rate of <50% acute G3 and <10% acute G4 toxicity.

Results: Twenty-six patients were assigned to 68 Gy, of whom 6 were planned to 64 Gy; 29 patients were assigned to 70 Gy of whom 1 was planned to 68 Gy, 2 patients were assigned and planned to 72 Gy; no patients were assigned to 74 Gy. Three patients did not complete the treatment as planned, of whom only 1 patient stopped treatment because dose-limiting toxicity occurred. The MTD was 70 Gy. Acute genito-urinary and gastro-intestinal G3 acute toxicity was seen in 19% and 7% of patients, respectively. No acute G4 genito-urinary or gastro-intestinal toxicity was seen. Late toxicity (any) G3 and G4 was seen in 14% and 2% of patients, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 58% (95% CI, 44%-71%). The bladder preservation rate was 89% (95% CI, 88%-96%) with 6 patients not retaining native bladder function.

Conclusions: Bladder tumor-focused dose escalation to 70 Gy using image guided adaptive radiation therapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. This dose level has been evaluated in a phase II randomized control trial (RAIDER NCT02447549).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱肿瘤聚焦适应性放射治疗:I 期剂量升级研究的临床结果。
目的/目标:我们确定图像引导自适应放疗(IGART)用于肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)根治性治疗的最大耐受肿瘤聚焦剂量(MTD)和长期临床疗效:59名T2-T4aN0M0单灶尿路上皮性肌浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者适合接受日常根治性放疗,这些患者是按照伦理批准的方案(XX)进行前瞻性招募的。计划对未受累的膀胱(PTVbladder)进行 52Gy 分 32 次放疗(f)。膀胱肿瘤(PTVtumour)的计划剂量为 68、70、72 或 74Gy。如果违反了风险器官(OAR)剂量限制,则计划将膀胱肿瘤(PTVtumour)的剂量设定为 64Gy。剂量水平的分配是通过对之前招募的所有患者进行并发毒性评估来确定的。急性毒性评估采用 CTCAE v3.0;晚期毒性评估采用 RTOG 标准。MTD被预先定义为估计晚期毒性和观察率≤15%≥G3的最高剂量水平:26名患者被分配接受68Gy治疗,其中6名患者计划接受64Gy治疗;29名患者被分配接受70Gy治疗,其中1名患者计划接受68Gy治疗,2名患者被分配并计划接受72Gy治疗;没有患者被分配接受74Gy治疗。三名患者未按计划完成治疗,其中只有一名患者因出现剂量限制性毒性而停止治疗。MTD为70Gy。分别有19%和7%的患者出现急性泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)G3急性毒性。没有出现 4 级泌尿生殖系统或胃肠道毒性。分别有 14% 和 2% 的患者出现了 G3 和 G4 级晚期毒性(任何)。5年总生存率为58%(95% CI 44-71%)。膀胱保留率为89%(95% CI,88%至96%),其中6名患者未保留原生膀胱功能:结论:使用 IGART 将膀胱肿瘤的集中剂量提升至 70Gy 是可行的,且毒性可接受。该剂量水平已在一项 II 期随机对照试验(XXXXX)中进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Conjunction Junction, Preserve the Function: Nonoperative Management of Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma. Getting Cheeky With It: Adult Rhabdomyosarcoma. In Regard to Song et al. In Reply to Khor et al. Looking Forward and Looking Back: Cutting-Edge Advances and Long-Standing Controversies in Head and Neck Cancer Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1