Prospective Evaluation of Ease and Difficulties of 869 Cases of Intrauterine Devices Removals

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102616
Jacques B.E. Versailles MD, MSc, Luis Bahamondes MD, PhD, Ana Claudia Marcelino MD, MC, Paula da Cunha Pereira RN, MC, Cassia R.T. Juliato MD, PhD
{"title":"Prospective Evaluation of Ease and Difficulties of 869 Cases of Intrauterine Devices Removals","authors":"Jacques B.E. Versailles MD, MSc,&nbsp;Luis Bahamondes MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ana Claudia Marcelino MD, MC,&nbsp;Paula da Cunha Pereira RN, MC,&nbsp;Cassia R.T. Juliato MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective was to describe the ease and difficulty of removing intrauterine devices (IUDs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a prospective study at the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP. We included women who requested IUD removal. We excluded women with partial IUD expulsion in which the IUD was protruded at the external os. We identified difficult IUD removal when the removal was challenging, including the inability to visualize IUD strings extending from the cervical os.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 869 women participated. Women were aged 29.4 ± 8.0 years (mean ± SD; range 14–51) and the duration of IUD use at the time of removal was 4.3 ± 4.2 years. We found that 702 (80.8%) women had visible strings at the external os and the removals were performed at the first attempt without difficulty in 692 (79.6%) participants. The pain was more intense (&gt;4) in cases of difficult removals. After multivariate logistic analysis, difficult removals were associated with users of IUD ≥3 years (3 times higher risk); for each previous cesarean delivery, the risk increased by 1.5 times.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study showed that IUD removal is an easy and safe procedure, with only a small proportion of women reporting significant pain with IUD removal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The objective was to describe the ease and difficulty of removing intrauterine devices (IUDs).

Methods

We conducted a prospective study at the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP. We included women who requested IUD removal. We excluded women with partial IUD expulsion in which the IUD was protruded at the external os. We identified difficult IUD removal when the removal was challenging, including the inability to visualize IUD strings extending from the cervical os.

Results

A total of 869 women participated. Women were aged 29.4 ± 8.0 years (mean ± SD; range 14–51) and the duration of IUD use at the time of removal was 4.3 ± 4.2 years. We found that 702 (80.8%) women had visible strings at the external os and the removals were performed at the first attempt without difficulty in 692 (79.6%) participants. The pain was more intense (>4) in cases of difficult removals. After multivariate logistic analysis, difficult removals were associated with users of IUD ≥3 years (3 times higher risk); for each previous cesarean delivery, the risk increased by 1.5 times.

Conclusions

Our study showed that IUD removal is an easy and safe procedure, with only a small proportion of women reporting significant pain with IUD removal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 872 例宫内节育器取出手术的难易程度进行前瞻性评估。
目的:描述取出宫内节育器(IUD)的难易程度:目的是描述取出宫内节育器(IUD)的难易程度:我们在 XXXX 医学院 XXXX 大学开展了一项前瞻性研究。我们纳入了要求取出宫内节育器的妇女。我们排除了部分宫内节育器被取出的妇女,因为这些妇女的宫内节育器突出于子宫外口。如果取出宫内节育器具有挑战性,包括无法看到宫颈口处延伸的宫内节育器线,我们将确定为难以取出宫内节育器:共有 869 名妇女参与。妇女的年龄为 29.4 ± 8.0 岁(平均 ± SD;范围 14-51),取出宫内节育器时的使用时间为 4.3 ± 4.2 年。我们发现,702 名妇女(80.8%)的宫颈外口有明显的线,692 名妇女(79.6%)在第一次尝试时就顺利取出了宫内节育器。在难以取出的病例中,疼痛更为剧烈(>4 级)。经过多变量逻辑分析,难以取出宫内节育器与使用宫内节育器超过 3 年有关(风险高出 3 倍);以前每进行一次剖宫产,风险就增加 1.5 倍:我们的研究表明,取出宫内节育器是一项简单而安全的手术,只有一小部分妇女表示在取出宫内节育器时有明显的疼痛感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
302
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.
期刊最新文献
AN ILEAL MESENTERIC LEIOMYOMA - A RARE EXTRAUTERINE SITE. Higher Risk of Wound Complications but no Clinically Significant Increase in Operative Time for Smokers Receiving Myomectomy for Uterine Fibroids. Indications for Transfer and Care Pathways of Inuit Transferred to a Tertiary Center for Childbirth in Quebec, Canada: A Retrospective Chart Review 2015-2019. Recognizing Endometrial Cancer Risks in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Experiences: insights from community qualitative interviews and workshop. Guideline No. 456: Prenatal Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1