Assessing parosmia patients: a study on the evaluation method using a self-administered odor questionnaire for parosmia.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.080
M Tei, E Mori, N Yonezawa, Y Kishimoto, H Tanaka, N Yanagi, Y Tsurumoto, M Nagai, R Sekine, N Otori, K Tsuzuki
{"title":"Assessing parosmia patients: a study on the evaluation method using a self-administered odor questionnaire for parosmia.","authors":"M Tei, E Mori, N Yonezawa, Y Kishimoto, H Tanaka, N Yanagi, Y Tsurumoto, M Nagai, R Sekine, N Otori, K Tsuzuki","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parosmia symptoms are difficult to quantify due to their heterogeneity among patients, and thus a clinical challenge. This study aimed to assess parosmia with Self-Administered Odor Questionnaire for Parosmia (SAOQ-P), a modification of the widely used SAOQ in Japan. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of SAOQ-P in identifying parosmia symptoms and its potential integration into the clinical assessment process. The study also explored traditional olfactory test differences between patients with and without parosmia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients at Jikei Smell Clinic that presented between May 2022 and November 2022 were recruited and administered the SAOQ-P, which had an added question about changes in the perception of 20 daily odors compared to the original SAOQ. Traditional olfactory tests utilized T&T olfactometry and Open Essence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 279 patients, 81 had parosmia, while 198 did not exhibit parosmic symptoms. Parosmia prevalence was influenced by the cause of olfactory dysfunction, with post-infectious and post-COVID-19 patients showing higher parosmia rates. Among parosmia patients, 87% reported changes in their perception of at least one odor assessed by SAOQ-P, with coffee, stool, and perfume most commonly affected. Traditional olfactory tests showed no significant differences between parosmia and non-parosmia groups. The number of odors causing parosmia was negatively correlated with age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAOQ-P offers a promising approach to assess and quantify parosmia symptoms, seamlessly integrating into clinical assessments. SAOQ-P identified parosmia in 87% of patients and revealed insights into triggering factors. Traditional olfactory tests' limitations underscore the need for more accurate, patient-centric diagnostic approaches for parosmia.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"566-575"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parosmia symptoms are difficult to quantify due to their heterogeneity among patients, and thus a clinical challenge. This study aimed to assess parosmia with Self-Administered Odor Questionnaire for Parosmia (SAOQ-P), a modification of the widely used SAOQ in Japan. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of SAOQ-P in identifying parosmia symptoms and its potential integration into the clinical assessment process. The study also explored traditional olfactory test differences between patients with and without parosmia.

Methods: Patients at Jikei Smell Clinic that presented between May 2022 and November 2022 were recruited and administered the SAOQ-P, which had an added question about changes in the perception of 20 daily odors compared to the original SAOQ. Traditional olfactory tests utilized T&T olfactometry and Open Essence.

Results: Of 279 patients, 81 had parosmia, while 198 did not exhibit parosmic symptoms. Parosmia prevalence was influenced by the cause of olfactory dysfunction, with post-infectious and post-COVID-19 patients showing higher parosmia rates. Among parosmia patients, 87% reported changes in their perception of at least one odor assessed by SAOQ-P, with coffee, stool, and perfume most commonly affected. Traditional olfactory tests showed no significant differences between parosmia and non-parosmia groups. The number of odors causing parosmia was negatively correlated with age.

Conclusion: SAOQ-P offers a promising approach to assess and quantify parosmia symptoms, seamlessly integrating into clinical assessments. SAOQ-P identified parosmia in 87% of patients and revealed insights into triggering factors. Traditional olfactory tests' limitations underscore the need for more accurate, patient-centric diagnostic approaches for parosmia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估肤浅症患者:使用自制肤浅症气味问卷的评估方法研究。
背景:由于患者之间的异质性,肤浅症状很难量化,因此是一项临床挑战。本研究旨在使用自制的 "肤浅气味问卷"(SAOQ-P)来评估肤浅症,SAOQ-P 是对日本广泛使用的 SAOQ 的修改。主要目的是评估 SAOQ-P 在识别肤浅症状方面的有效性,以及将其纳入临床评估过程的可能性。研究还探讨了患有和不患有嗅觉障碍的患者在传统嗅觉测试中的差异:方法:招募 2022 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间在 Jikei Smell 诊所就诊的患者,并对其进行 SAOQ-P,与原始 SAOQ 相比,SAOQ-P 增加了一个关于 20 种日常气味感知变化的问题。传统的嗅觉测试采用了T&T嗅觉测定法和Open Essence:结果:在 279 名患者中,81 人有嗅觉障碍,198 人没有嗅觉障碍症状。副嗅发生率受嗅觉功能障碍原因的影响,感染后和 COVID-19 后患者的副嗅发生率较高。在嗅妄症患者中,87%的人报告说,他们对 SAOQ-P 评估的至少一种气味的感知发生了变化,其中咖啡、粪便和香水最常受到影响。传统的嗅觉测试显示,副嗅觉症组和非副嗅觉症组之间没有明显差异。导致副嗅觉障碍的气味数量与年龄呈负相关:SAOQ-P为评估和量化副嗅症状提供了一种很有前景的方法,可与临床评估无缝结合。SAOQ-P确定了87%的患者患有副嗅症,并揭示了诱发因素。传统嗅觉测试的局限性突出表明,需要更准确的、以患者为中心的抛尸症诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Is nasal closure an effective treatment for severe refractory epistaxis in HHT? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Analysis of nasal fracture management and subsequent surgical outcomes across demographics. Omalizumab reduces allergic rhinitis symptoms due to Japanese cedar pollen by improving eosinophilic inflammation. Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1