The Role of Healthcare Leaders in Promoting Vaccine Acceptance in Saudi Arabia.

IF 3.4 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S470522
Eidan M Al Zahrani
{"title":"The Role of Healthcare Leaders in Promoting Vaccine Acceptance in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Eidan M Al Zahrani","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S470522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several vaccines have been recommended by the health authorities in recent years and have been opposed by debates, lack of public trust, and variable levels of hesitance that resulted in increased anti-vaccination advocacy and a subsequent reduction in vaccination rates worldwide.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the community's perceptions of the role of healthcare leadership in promoting vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used a validated questionnaire designed according to the study's objectives for a heterogeneous purposive sample of individuals over 18 years old in Saudi Arabia. Participants completed the questionnaire online via a link provided by multiple social media platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 7159 participants with various demographical features. On a five-point Likert scale, the average level of agreement on the role of healthcare executives in promoting vaccines was 3.76. The average level of agreement about the role of healthcare leaders in promoting vaccines was 3.76 out of five. Men were more likely than women to agree on healthcare worker's influence, 63.6% and 58.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). The ages of participants showed a favorable correlation with their level of agreement on the role of healthcare leaders in promoting vaccines (P < 0.001). The level of agreement on healthcare leader's role in promoting vaccines was inversely proportional to the education level (P < 0.001). The retired group reported the highest score, followed by the employed ones (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unlike other political and religious leaders, this study indicates that healthcare professionals significantly impact vaccine hesitancy and uptake. Despite rising vaccine hesitancy, healthcare leaders remain more trustworthy providers of guidance and influence over vaccination decisions than others. In addition, the health leader's factual message boosts people's self-esteem and helps them decide to be vaccinated.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":"16 ","pages":"279-286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11277817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S470522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several vaccines have been recommended by the health authorities in recent years and have been opposed by debates, lack of public trust, and variable levels of hesitance that resulted in increased anti-vaccination advocacy and a subsequent reduction in vaccination rates worldwide.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the community's perceptions of the role of healthcare leadership in promoting vaccine acceptance.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used a validated questionnaire designed according to the study's objectives for a heterogeneous purposive sample of individuals over 18 years old in Saudi Arabia. Participants completed the questionnaire online via a link provided by multiple social media platforms.

Results: The study included 7159 participants with various demographical features. On a five-point Likert scale, the average level of agreement on the role of healthcare executives in promoting vaccines was 3.76. The average level of agreement about the role of healthcare leaders in promoting vaccines was 3.76 out of five. Men were more likely than women to agree on healthcare worker's influence, 63.6% and 58.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). The ages of participants showed a favorable correlation with their level of agreement on the role of healthcare leaders in promoting vaccines (P < 0.001). The level of agreement on healthcare leader's role in promoting vaccines was inversely proportional to the education level (P < 0.001). The retired group reported the highest score, followed by the employed ones (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Unlike other political and religious leaders, this study indicates that healthcare professionals significantly impact vaccine hesitancy and uptake. Despite rising vaccine hesitancy, healthcare leaders remain more trustworthy providers of guidance and influence over vaccination decisions than others. In addition, the health leader's factual message boosts people's self-esteem and helps them decide to be vaccinated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯医疗保健领导者在促进疫苗接受度方面的作用。
背景:目的:本研究旨在探讨社区对医疗保健领导在促进疫苗接受方面所起作用的看法:这项横断面研究使用了根据研究目标设计的有效问卷,调查对象为沙特阿拉伯 18 岁以上的异质性目的性样本。参与者通过多个社交媒体平台提供的链接在线填写问卷:研究共纳入 7159 名参与者,他们的人口统计学特征各不相同。在五点李克特量表中,对医疗保健管理人员在推广疫苗方面的作用的平均认同度为 3.76。对于医疗保健领导在推广疫苗方面的作用的平均认同度为 3.76(满分为 5 分)。男性比女性更容易认同医护人员的影响力,分别为 63.6% 和 58.6%(P < 0.001)。参与者的年龄与其对医护领导在疫苗推广中的作用的认同度呈正相关(P < 0.001)。对医护领导在推广疫苗中的作用的认同程度与受教育程度成反比(P < 0.001)。退休组的得分最高,其次是在职组(P < 0.001):与其他政治和宗教领袖不同,本研究表明,医疗保健专业人员对疫苗的犹豫不决和接种率有重大影响。尽管疫苗接种犹豫率上升,但与其他人相比,医疗保健领导者仍是更值得信赖的疫苗接种指导者和影响者。此外,医疗领导者所传达的事实信息还能增强人们的自尊心,帮助他们决定接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
期刊最新文献
Value Co-Creation in Telemedicine: A Qualitative Study of Pediatricians' Expectations Regarding Telehomecare Implementation in an Italian Pediatric Hospital. Professionalism and Self-Evaluation: Diverging Perspectives Among Physicians and Nurses. Organizational Factors Driving the Realization of Digital Health Transformation Benefits from Health Service Managers: A Qualitative Study. Barriers to Recruitment and Retention Among Underrepresented Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Clinical Trial Research Coordinating Staff at a Cancer Center. Empowering Leadership: A Journey of Growth and Insight Through a Mentoring Program for Nurses in Leadership Positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1