Comparison of four ventilation tubes commonly used in the pediatric population: A retrospective cohort study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1002/lio2.1306
Margareta Morrissette MD, Tom Ben-Dov MD, Michele Santacatterina PhD, Éadaoin Ó. Catháin MB, BAO, BCh, Max M. April MD
{"title":"Comparison of four ventilation tubes commonly used in the pediatric population: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Margareta Morrissette MD,&nbsp;Tom Ben-Dov MD,&nbsp;Michele Santacatterina PhD,&nbsp;Éadaoin Ó. Catháin MB, BAO, BCh,&nbsp;Max M. April MD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.1306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess differences in otorrhea, tympanic membrane perforation, and time to extrusion in children receiving one of four commonly used, short-term ventilation tubes for the first time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective chart review of 2 years of postoperative follow-up to analyze patient outcomes after insertion of either a Paparella type-I Activent, Armstrong Beveled, Modified Armstrong, or Armstrong Microgel ventilation tube. Incidence of complications was determined by reviewing provider notes. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine odds ratios of complications among the four tube types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 387 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 2.4 years and 35.9% were female. Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest odds of otorrhea. Paparella type-I tube had the shortest time to extrusion of about 9 months, while Armstrong Beveled had the longest, at almost 19 months. When evaluating episodes of otorrhea each child experienced on average, per month, Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest monthly rate of otorrhea and Paparella type-I the least. No significant differences were found regarding tympanic membrane perforation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective chart review showed that no tube was clinically superior across all complications. The findings from this study may give otolaryngologists an opportunity to consider choosing a specific type of tube according to the clinical situation. The large variations in extrusion times should be considered in terms of patient age, seasonality, and desired duration of tube placement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11283280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess differences in otorrhea, tympanic membrane perforation, and time to extrusion in children receiving one of four commonly used, short-term ventilation tubes for the first time.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of 2 years of postoperative follow-up to analyze patient outcomes after insertion of either a Paparella type-I Activent, Armstrong Beveled, Modified Armstrong, or Armstrong Microgel ventilation tube. Incidence of complications was determined by reviewing provider notes. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine odds ratios of complications among the four tube types.

Results

A total of 387 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 2.4 years and 35.9% were female. Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest odds of otorrhea. Paparella type-I tube had the shortest time to extrusion of about 9 months, while Armstrong Beveled had the longest, at almost 19 months. When evaluating episodes of otorrhea each child experienced on average, per month, Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest monthly rate of otorrhea and Paparella type-I the least. No significant differences were found regarding tympanic membrane perforation.

Conclusions

This retrospective chart review showed that no tube was clinically superior across all complications. The findings from this study may give otolaryngologists an opportunity to consider choosing a specific type of tube according to the clinical situation. The large variations in extrusion times should be considered in terms of patient age, seasonality, and desired duration of tube placement.

Level of Evidence

4.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科常用的四种通气管的比较:回顾性队列研究。
目的评估首次接受四种常用短期通气管中的一种的患儿在流耳、鼓膜穿孔和挤出时间方面的差异:方法:对术后 2 年的随访进行回顾性病历审查,分析插入 Paparella I 型 Activent、Armstrong Beveled、Modified Armstrong 或 Armstrong Microgel 通气管后患者的治疗效果。并发症的发生率通过查看医疗服务提供者的记录来确定。调整后的多变量逻辑回归模型用于确定四种类型通气管的并发症几率:共对 387 名患者进行了复查。平均年龄为 2.4 岁,35.9% 为女性。阿姆斯特朗斜面导管出现耳鸣的几率最高。Paparella I 型导管挤出时间最短,约为 9 个月,而 Armstrong 斜面导管挤出时间最长,将近 19 个月。在评估每个孩子每月平均发生的耳鸣次数时,Armstrong 斜面导管的每月耳鸣发生率最高,而 Paparella I 型导管的每月耳鸣发生率最低。在鼓膜穿孔方面没有发现明显差异:这项回顾性病历审查显示,在所有并发症中,没有一种导管具有临床优势。这项研究的结果可能会让耳鼻喉科医生有机会根据临床情况考虑选择特定类型的导管。挤压时间的巨大差异应从患者年龄、季节性和所需置管时间等方面加以考虑:4.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges and outcomes of airway surgery in a post-war low-resource setting: A case series from Mekelle, Ethiopia. Challenges and outcomes of airway surgery in a post-war low-resource setting: A case series from Mekelle, Ethiopia Automated classification of online reviews of otolaryngologists Individualized post-operative prediction of cochlear implantation outcomes in children with prelingual deafness using functional near-infrared spectroscopy Causes and treatment of secondary sphenoid sinus infection post-endoscopic transsphenoidal approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1