Ning Li , Peter Styczynski , Roger Gibb , Chuiying Li , Randy Marsh
{"title":"Study on percutaneous penetration of representative cosmetic ingredients in a baby wipe product in an in vitro diaper rash skin model","authors":"Ning Li , Peter Styczynski , Roger Gibb , Chuiying Li , Randy Marsh","doi":"10.1016/j.tiv.2024.105912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studying percutaneous penetration of various cosmetic ingredients through intact and compromised skin can provide insight on quantitative exposure assessment for baby products intended for diapered skin. We developed an <em>in vitro</em> model (tape-stripped human skin) designed to achieve the Trans-Epidermal Water Loss values measured in babies with various degrees of diaper dermatitis. Six reference compounds showed the impact of physicochemical properties on absorption through this “diaper rash” skin model. Under simulated diaper conditions, dermal absorption of cosmetic ingredients (phenoxyethanol, sodium benzoate, benzyl alcohol, disodium EDTA, and propylene glycol) was different, but <100%. Additionally, the effect of diaper rash on dermal absorption of well-absorbed ingredients (phenoxyethanol, sodium benzoate, and benzyl alcohol) was limited (enhancement of 1.1–1.3), while the enhancement for moderately absorbed compounds (disodium EDTA and propylene glycol) was 1.8–3.3. Absorption <em>via</em> skin with “diaper rash” is specific to individual ingredients and exposure conditions, so a fixed uncertainty factor is not appropriate for safety assessment. The data support that the default 100% dermal absorption commonly used in first-tier risk assessments for diapered skin is conservative. This diaper rash skin model provides a practical tool of estimating absorption of various ingredients in baby products intended for diapered skin.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54423,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology in Vitro","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 105912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233324001425/pdfft?md5=dbb80735eed805d359f9e88ce98d8c15&pid=1-s2.0-S0887233324001425-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology in Vitro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233324001425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Studying percutaneous penetration of various cosmetic ingredients through intact and compromised skin can provide insight on quantitative exposure assessment for baby products intended for diapered skin. We developed an in vitro model (tape-stripped human skin) designed to achieve the Trans-Epidermal Water Loss values measured in babies with various degrees of diaper dermatitis. Six reference compounds showed the impact of physicochemical properties on absorption through this “diaper rash” skin model. Under simulated diaper conditions, dermal absorption of cosmetic ingredients (phenoxyethanol, sodium benzoate, benzyl alcohol, disodium EDTA, and propylene glycol) was different, but <100%. Additionally, the effect of diaper rash on dermal absorption of well-absorbed ingredients (phenoxyethanol, sodium benzoate, and benzyl alcohol) was limited (enhancement of 1.1–1.3), while the enhancement for moderately absorbed compounds (disodium EDTA and propylene glycol) was 1.8–3.3. Absorption via skin with “diaper rash” is specific to individual ingredients and exposure conditions, so a fixed uncertainty factor is not appropriate for safety assessment. The data support that the default 100% dermal absorption commonly used in first-tier risk assessments for diapered skin is conservative. This diaper rash skin model provides a practical tool of estimating absorption of various ingredients in baby products intended for diapered skin.
期刊介绍:
Toxicology in Vitro publishes original research papers and reviews on the application and use of in vitro systems for assessing or predicting the toxic effects of chemicals and elucidating their mechanisms of action. These in vitro techniques include utilizing cell or tissue cultures, isolated cells, tissue slices, subcellular fractions, transgenic cell cultures, and cells from transgenic organisms, as well as in silico modelling. The Journal will focus on investigations that involve the development and validation of new in vitro methods, e.g. for prediction of toxic effects based on traditional and in silico modelling; on the use of methods in high-throughput toxicology and pharmacology; elucidation of mechanisms of toxic action; the application of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in toxicology, as well as on comparative studies that characterise the relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. The Journal strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that focus on the development of in vitro methods, their practical applications and regulatory use (e.g. in the areas of food components cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). Toxicology in Vitro discourages papers that record reporting on toxicological effects from materials, such as plant extracts or herbal medicines, that have not been chemically characterized.