Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2024-07-24 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3
Kostas Stavrianakis, Jacob Nielsen, Zoe Morrison
{"title":"Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece.","authors":"Kostas Stavrianakis, Jacob Nielsen, Zoe Morrison","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development and implementation of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technologies plays an increasingly important part in European Union (EU) countries' decarbonisation policies and strategies. Several studies have shown the important role social acceptance plays in determining the outcomes of CCUS projects and how social acceptance is shaped by the national and local contexts. Yet most studies on CCUS and social acceptance have focused on a few northern European countries despite the increasing numbers of CCUS projects across the European Union. This study seeks to help address this gap by conducting a case study on how local dynamics shaped people's acceptance and awareness of CCUS in two separate Greek communities. Based on semi-structured interviews with community members near a CCUS pilot plant, and a focus group with community members from a potential storage site, this single case study explores the factors and dynamics that shaped the participants' perceptions of CCUS technologies. Our findings indicate that, despite the low level of awareness of CCUS technologies, participants could draw on their situated knowledge to identify potential drawbacks with their application. We identified scepticism regarding the adoption of new technologies and the organisations involved based on past experiences, and a notable lack of provision of technology and location-specific information as well as public engagement by the project consortium. Our recommendations for future projects and community engagement include the early involvement of the public in project development, location-based transparent information, appropriate channels to facilitate knowledge exchange, and educational initiatives to build communities' capability to influence projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"3 ","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11273079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development and implementation of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technologies plays an increasingly important part in European Union (EU) countries' decarbonisation policies and strategies. Several studies have shown the important role social acceptance plays in determining the outcomes of CCUS projects and how social acceptance is shaped by the national and local contexts. Yet most studies on CCUS and social acceptance have focused on a few northern European countries despite the increasing numbers of CCUS projects across the European Union. This study seeks to help address this gap by conducting a case study on how local dynamics shaped people's acceptance and awareness of CCUS in two separate Greek communities. Based on semi-structured interviews with community members near a CCUS pilot plant, and a focus group with community members from a potential storage site, this single case study explores the factors and dynamics that shaped the participants' perceptions of CCUS technologies. Our findings indicate that, despite the low level of awareness of CCUS technologies, participants could draw on their situated knowledge to identify potential drawbacks with their application. We identified scepticism regarding the adoption of new technologies and the organisations involved based on past experiences, and a notable lack of provision of technology and location-specific information as well as public engagement by the project consortium. Our recommendations for future projects and community engagement include the early involvement of the public in project development, location-based transparent information, appropriate channels to facilitate knowledge exchange, and educational initiatives to build communities' capability to influence projects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对 CCUS 的看法和接受程度:希腊定性案例研究的初步结果。
碳捕集、利用与封存(CCUS)技术的开发与实施在欧盟(EU)国家的去碳化政策和战略中扮演着越来越重要的角色。多项研究表明,社会接受度在决定 CCUS 项目成果方面发挥着重要作用,而国家和地方环境又是如何影响社会接受度的。然而,尽管欧盟各国的 CCUS 项目数量不断增加,但大多数有关 CCUS 和社会接受度的研究都集中在少数几个北欧国家。本研究试图通过对希腊两个不同社区的地方动态如何影响人们对 CCUS 的接受度和认知度进行案例研究,帮助弥补这一空白。通过对 CCUS 试点工厂附近的社区成员进行半结构化访谈,以及对潜在储存地点的社区成员进行焦点小组访谈,本案例研究探讨了影响参与者对 CCUS 技术看法的因素和动态。我们的研究结果表明,尽管参与者对 CCUS 技术的认识水平较低,但他们可以利用自己的知识来发现这些技术在应用过程中可能存在的缺点。我们发现,基于过去的经验,人们对采用新技术和相关组织持怀疑态度,而且项目联合体明显缺乏提供技术和特定地点的信息以及公众参与。我们对未来项目和社区参与的建议包括:让公众尽早参与项目开发、提供基于位置的透明信息、提供适当的渠道促进知识交流,以及开展教育活动以培养社区影响项目的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-designing ab initio electronic structure methods on a RISC-V vector architecture. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Unveiling Maternal Health Dynamics from Pregnancy Through Postpartum Perspectives. Antibiotics in honey: a comprehensive review on occurrence and analytical methodologies. Challenges to ethical public engagement in research funding: a perspective from practice. Environmental impacts of drugs against parasitic vector-borne diseases and the need to integrate sustainability into their development and use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1