Law enforcement-led, pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment may reduce crime recidivism, incarceration, and overdose deaths: Program evaluation outcomes

{"title":"Law enforcement-led, pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment may reduce crime recidivism, incarceration, and overdose deaths: Program evaluation outcomes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Substance use disorder (SUD), overdose, and drug use-related crime continue to increase in the U.S. Pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment programs may decrease crime recidivism and overdose deaths. We assessed the impact of a community-wide diversion-to-treatment initiative on crime, incarceration, and overdose.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This article reports on the prospective evaluation of a law enforcement-led, pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment program on crime, incarceration, and overdose deaths compared between participants who did not engage (non-engaged; n = 103), engaged but did not complete (non-completers; n = 60) and completed (completers; n = 100) the program. Participants included 263 adults apprehended by police officers for low-level, drug use-related crimes between September 1, 2017 and August 31, 2020. The program offered eligible persons participation in a six-month program consisting of a clinical assessment, referral to addiction treatment services based on each individual's needs, connection to recovery peer support, and treatment engagement monitoring. Completers had their initial criminal charges ‘voided,’ while non-engaged and non-Completer participants had their original charges filed with local prosecutors. The project collected participant-level data on arrests and incarceration within 12 months before and 12 months after program enrollment and data on fatal overdose within 12 months after program enrollment. Logistic regression predicted outcomes using baseline demographics (sex, age, race, housing status) and pre-index crime arrest and incarceration indices as covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After accounting for baseline demographics and pre-enrollment arrest/incarceration history, logistic regression models found that the non-engaged and the non-Completer groups were more likely than completers to be arrested (odds ratios [ORs]: 3.9 [95 % CI, 2.0–7.7] and 3.6 [95 % CI, 1.7–7.5], respectively) and incarcerated (ORs: 10.3 [95 % CI, 5.0–20.8] and 21.0 [95 % CI, 7.9–55.7], respectively) during the 12-month follow-up. Rates of overdose deaths during the 12-month follow-up were greatest in non-engaged (6/103, 5.8 %) and non-Completer (2/60, 3.3 %) groups; completers had the lowest rate (2/100, 2.0 %), with all deaths occurring after completion of the six-month treatment/monitoring program.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Collaboration between law enforcement, clinicians, researchers, and the broader community to divert adults who commit a low-level, drug use-related crime from criminal prosecution to addiction treatment may effectively reduce crime recidivism, incarceration, and overdose deaths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294987592400170X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Substance use disorder (SUD), overdose, and drug use-related crime continue to increase in the U.S. Pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment programs may decrease crime recidivism and overdose deaths. We assessed the impact of a community-wide diversion-to-treatment initiative on crime, incarceration, and overdose.

Methods

This article reports on the prospective evaluation of a law enforcement-led, pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment program on crime, incarceration, and overdose deaths compared between participants who did not engage (non-engaged; n = 103), engaged but did not complete (non-completers; n = 60) and completed (completers; n = 100) the program. Participants included 263 adults apprehended by police officers for low-level, drug use-related crimes between September 1, 2017 and August 31, 2020. The program offered eligible persons participation in a six-month program consisting of a clinical assessment, referral to addiction treatment services based on each individual's needs, connection to recovery peer support, and treatment engagement monitoring. Completers had their initial criminal charges ‘voided,’ while non-engaged and non-Completer participants had their original charges filed with local prosecutors. The project collected participant-level data on arrests and incarceration within 12 months before and 12 months after program enrollment and data on fatal overdose within 12 months after program enrollment. Logistic regression predicted outcomes using baseline demographics (sex, age, race, housing status) and pre-index crime arrest and incarceration indices as covariates.

Results

After accounting for baseline demographics and pre-enrollment arrest/incarceration history, logistic regression models found that the non-engaged and the non-Completer groups were more likely than completers to be arrested (odds ratios [ORs]: 3.9 [95 % CI, 2.0–7.7] and 3.6 [95 % CI, 1.7–7.5], respectively) and incarcerated (ORs: 10.3 [95 % CI, 5.0–20.8] and 21.0 [95 % CI, 7.9–55.7], respectively) during the 12-month follow-up. Rates of overdose deaths during the 12-month follow-up were greatest in non-engaged (6/103, 5.8 %) and non-Completer (2/60, 3.3 %) groups; completers had the lowest rate (2/100, 2.0 %), with all deaths occurring after completion of the six-month treatment/monitoring program.

Conclusions

Collaboration between law enforcement, clinicians, researchers, and the broader community to divert adults who commit a low-level, drug use-related crime from criminal prosecution to addiction treatment may effectively reduce crime recidivism, incarceration, and overdose deaths.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执法部门主导的逮捕前转送治疗可减少犯罪累犯、监禁和用药过量死亡:项目评估结果。
导言:在美国,药物使用障碍(SUD)、用药过量和与药物使用相关的犯罪持续增加。我们评估了社区范围内的转送治疗计划对犯罪、监禁和用药过量的影响:本文报告了由执法部门主导的逮捕前转送治疗计划对犯罪、监禁和用药过量死亡的前瞻性评估,并对未参与计划(未参与;人数=103)、参与但未完成计划(未完成;人数=60)和完成计划(完成;人数=100)的参与者进行了比较。参与者包括在 2017 年 9 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 31 日期间因与毒品使用有关的低级犯罪而被警察逮捕的 263 名成年人。该计划让符合条件的人参加为期 6 个月的项目,包括临床评估、根据每个人的需求转介到戒毒治疗服务机构、与康复同伴支持建立联系以及治疗参与监测。完成计划者的初始刑事指控将被 "撤销",而未参与计划者和未完成计划者将向当地检察官提交其原始指控。该项目收集了参与者在加入项目前 12 个月和加入项目后 12 个月内的逮捕和监禁数据,以及加入项目后 12 个月内的致命用药过量数据。使用基线人口统计学数据(性别、年龄、种族、住房状况)和指数前犯罪逮捕和监禁指数作为协变量,对结果进行逻辑回归预测:结果: 在考虑了基线人口统计学特征和参与计划前的被捕/入狱史后,逻辑回归模型发现,未参与计划组和未完成计划组比完成计划组更有可能被捕(几率比 [ORs]:在 12 个月的随访期间,未参与组和未完成组比完成组更有可能被捕(几率比 [ORs]:分别为 3.9 [95 % CI,2.0-7.7] 和 3.6 [95 % CI,1.7-7.5])和入狱(ORs:分别为 10.3 [95 % CI,5.0-20.8] 和 21.0 [95 % CI,7.9-55.7])。在 12 个月的随访期间,未参与组(6/103,5.8%)和未完成组(2/60,3.3%)的用药过量死亡率最高;完成组的用药过量死亡率最低(2/100,2.0%),所有死亡病例均发生在完成为期 6 个月的治疗/监测计划之后:执法部门、临床医生、研究人员和更广泛的社区合作,将犯有低级毒品相关罪行的成年人从刑事起诉转到戒毒治疗,可有效减少犯罪累犯、监禁和吸毒过量死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent SMART: Effects of residential treatment and an adjunctive parenting intervention on behavioral health services utilization. “Yeah, this is not going to work for me”–The impact of federal policy restrictions on methadone continuation upon release from jail or prison A community-academic partnership to develop an implementation support package for overdose prevention in permanent supportive housing Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder Is naloxone where it needs to be? Using spatial analytics to examine equitable distribution of community-based naloxone sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1