Educational perspectives in cardiothoracic anesthesia in the United States using a survey of educators and learners.

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.17085/apm.24011
Rushil Bose, Matthew Evers, Wai-Man Liu, Shannon Grap, Theodore J Cios
{"title":"Educational perspectives in cardiothoracic anesthesia in the United States using a survey of educators and learners.","authors":"Rushil Bose, Matthew Evers, Wai-Man Liu, Shannon Grap, Theodore J Cios","doi":"10.17085/apm.24011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiothoracic anesthesiology training presents learners with unique challenges, procedural skills, and the management of high-intensity critical scenarios. An effective relationship between educator and learner can serve as the backbone for effective learning, which is crucial for the development of budding anesthesiologists. Strengthening this educational alliance between teachers and trainees involves understanding the educational values educators and learners find most important to their learning experiences. This study aimed to identify the key educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia for both learners and educators. By identifying these values in separate cohorts (learners and educators), the importance of various educational values can be examined and compared between the trainees and teachers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two separate surveys (one for learners and one for teachers) were adapted from the Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory to establish the importance of various educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia. Surveys were sent to 165 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States to trainees (residents and cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellows) and educators (board-certified cardiothoracic anesthesiologists).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of survey results from 19 educators and 57 learners revealed no statistical differences across the two groups, except Q15: \"Let trainee perform critical technical steps\" (P value = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While learners and educators in cardiothoracic anesthesia hold similar values regarding cardiac anesthesia education, they differ in the degree to which critical technical steps should be performed by learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":"241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiothoracic anesthesiology training presents learners with unique challenges, procedural skills, and the management of high-intensity critical scenarios. An effective relationship between educator and learner can serve as the backbone for effective learning, which is crucial for the development of budding anesthesiologists. Strengthening this educational alliance between teachers and trainees involves understanding the educational values educators and learners find most important to their learning experiences. This study aimed to identify the key educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia for both learners and educators. By identifying these values in separate cohorts (learners and educators), the importance of various educational values can be examined and compared between the trainees and teachers.

Methods: Two separate surveys (one for learners and one for teachers) were adapted from the Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory to establish the importance of various educational values related to cardiothoracic anesthesia. Surveys were sent to 165 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States to trainees (residents and cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellows) and educators (board-certified cardiothoracic anesthesiologists).

Results: Analysis of survey results from 19 educators and 57 learners revealed no statistical differences across the two groups, except Q15: "Let trainee perform critical technical steps" (P value = 0.02).

Conclusions: While learners and educators in cardiothoracic anesthesia hold similar values regarding cardiac anesthesia education, they differ in the degree to which critical technical steps should be performed by learners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对教育者和学习者的调查了解美国心胸麻醉的教育前景。
背景:心胸麻醉学培训为学员带来了独特的挑战、程序技能以及高强度危急情况的处理。教育者与学员之间的有效关系可以作为有效学习的基础,这对培养新晋麻醉师至关重要。要加强教师和学员之间的这种教育联盟,就必须了解教育者和学员认为对其学习经历最重要的教育价值。本研究旨在为学员和教育者确定与心胸麻醉相关的关键教育价值观。通过在不同的群体(学员和教育者)中识别这些价值观,可以检查各种教育价值观的重要性,并在学员和教师之间进行比较:方法:从普拉特和柯林斯教学观点量表(Pratt and Collins Teaching Perspectives Inventory)中改编了两份独立的调查问卷(一份针对学员,一份针对教师),以确定与心胸麻醉相关的各种教育价值观的重要性。向美国 165 个经 ACGME 认证的麻醉学住院医师培训项目的学员(住院医师和心胸麻醉学研究员)和教育者(经委员会认证的心胸麻醉师)发送了调查问卷:对 19 名教育者和 57 名学习者的调查结果进行分析后发现,除了 Q15:"让受训者执行关键技术步骤"(P 值 = 0.02)外,两组之间没有统计学差异:结论:虽然心胸麻醉学员和教育者对心脏麻醉教育持有相似的价值观,但他们在关键技术步骤应由学员执行的程度上存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of characteristics of patients whose sugammadex claims were denied by the Auto Insurance Claims Review Department of Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service: a retrospective single-center review. What is your optimal target of oxygen during general anesthesia in pediatric patients? Early extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery. Effective and safe pediatric sedation. Emergence delirium: an overview with an emphasis on the use of electroencephalography in its management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1