A Novel Taxonomy of Intraoperative Cholangiograms in Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Tool for Advancing Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Outcomes Research.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1177/00031348241268068
Elizabeth C Wood, Micaela K Gomez, Jessica L Rauh, Juhi Saxena, Jeffery Conner, Gregory R Stettler, Carl Westcott, Andrew M Nunn, Lucas P Neff, Maggie E Bosley
{"title":"A Novel Taxonomy of Intraoperative Cholangiograms in Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Tool for Advancing Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Outcomes Research.","authors":"Elizabeth C Wood, Micaela K Gomez, Jessica L Rauh, Juhi Saxena, Jeffery Conner, Gregory R Stettler, Carl Westcott, Andrew M Nunn, Lucas P Neff, Maggie E Bosley","doi":"10.1177/00031348241268068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholangiography for visualization of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an important diagnostic roadmap in the context of suspected choledocholithiasis (CDL). The renewed interest in transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) necessitates a general description of the range of CDL presentations. Our aim was to establish a novel classification system of intraoperative cholangiograms (IOCs) to advance research efforts in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A novel cholangiogram classification system, featuring 8 distinct presentations of choledocholithiasis, was applied to a data set of 80 preintervention IOCs for suspected choledocholithiasis. The classification system is as follows: A (no common bile duct stones, duodenal filling present, and concern for air bubbles), B (no common bile duct stones, no duodenal filling, and concern for sludge), C1 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), C2 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), D1 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), D2 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), E1 (congenital anatomical variant and/or common duct stricture), and E2 (surgically altered biliary anatomy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cholangiogram review yielded preintervention classifications for 6 of 8 variants (A-E): A (7.5%), B (3.75%), C1 (23.75%), C2 (42.5%), D1 (15%), and D2 (7.5%). Analysis of cystic duct diameter yielded no significant differences among classification groups, indicating no predominant pattern of cystic duct anatomy within a given classification.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An IOC classification system for suspected choledocholithiasis is foundational to answering key clinical questions for transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241268068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cholangiography for visualization of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an important diagnostic roadmap in the context of suspected choledocholithiasis (CDL). The renewed interest in transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) necessitates a general description of the range of CDL presentations. Our aim was to establish a novel classification system of intraoperative cholangiograms (IOCs) to advance research efforts in this field.

Methods: A novel cholangiogram classification system, featuring 8 distinct presentations of choledocholithiasis, was applied to a data set of 80 preintervention IOCs for suspected choledocholithiasis. The classification system is as follows: A (no common bile duct stones, duodenal filling present, and concern for air bubbles), B (no common bile duct stones, no duodenal filling, and concern for sludge), C1 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), C2 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), D1 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), D2 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), E1 (congenital anatomical variant and/or common duct stricture), and E2 (surgically altered biliary anatomy).

Results: Cholangiogram review yielded preintervention classifications for 6 of 8 variants (A-E): A (7.5%), B (3.75%), C1 (23.75%), C2 (42.5%), D1 (15%), and D2 (7.5%). Analysis of cystic duct diameter yielded no significant differences among classification groups, indicating no predominant pattern of cystic duct anatomy within a given classification.

Discussion: An IOC classification system for suspected choledocholithiasis is foundational to answering key clinical questions for transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疑似胆总管结石术中胆管造影的新分类法:推进腹腔镜胆总管探查成果研究的工具。
背景:在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中进行胆管造影以观察胆管树是疑似胆总管结石(CDL)的重要诊断方法。随着人们对经膀胱腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)的重新关注,有必要对 CDL 的表现范围进行总体描述。我们的目的是建立一套新颖的术中胆管造影(IOC)分类系统,以推动该领域的研究工作:方法:我们将一套新颖的胆管造影分类系统应用于 80 例疑似胆总管结石的术前 IOC 数据集,该系统具有 8 种不同的胆总管结石表现形式。分类系统如下:A(无胆总管结石、十二指肠充盈、有气泡)、B(无胆总管结石、无十二指肠充盈、有淤血)、C1(结石大小<囊管的 2 倍、有十二指肠充盈)、C2(结石大小<囊管的 2 倍、无十二指肠充盈)、D1(结石≥囊性导管 2 倍大小,十二指肠充盈)、D2(结石≥囊性导管 2 倍大小,十二指肠不充盈)、E1(先天性解剖变异和/或总管狭窄)和 E2(手术改变胆道解剖结构)。结果:胆管造影检查得出了 8 种变异中 6 种的干预前分类(A-E):A(7.5%)、B(3.75%)、C1(23.75%)、C2(42.5%)、D1(15%)和 D2(7.5%)。对囊管直径的分析结果显示,各分类组之间没有显著差异,这表明在特定分类中囊管解剖结构没有占主导地位的模式:讨论:疑似胆总管结石的 IOC 分类系统对回答经胆囊腹腔镜胆总管探查的关键临床问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Plain Chest Film Versus Computed Tomography of the Chest as the Initial Imaging Modality for Blunt Thoracic Injury. A Novel Taxonomy of Intraoperative Cholangiograms in Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Tool for Advancing Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Outcomes Research. Early Vasopressor Requirement Among Hypotensive Trauma Patients: Does It Cause More Harm Than Good? The Other Patient. Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Strategy of Mirizzi's Syndrome Treated With Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1