LSD-assisted therapy in patients with anxiety: open-label prospective 12-month follow-up.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1192/bjp.2024.99
Friederike Holze, Peter Gasser, Felix Müller, Manuel Strebel, Matthias E Liechti
{"title":"LSD-assisted therapy in patients with anxiety: open-label prospective 12-month follow-up.","authors":"Friederike Holze, Peter Gasser, Felix Müller, Manuel Strebel, Matthias E Liechti","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety disorders are a major public health burden with limited treatment options.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)-assisted therapy in patients with anxiety with or without life-threatening illness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was an <i>a priori</i>-planned long-term follow-up of an investigator-initiated, two-centre trial that used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, random-order, crossover design with two sessions with either oral LSD (200 μg) or placebo per period. Participants (<i>n</i> = 39) were followed up 1 year after the end-of-study visit to assess symptoms of anxiety, depression and long-term effects of psychedelics using Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Global (STAI-G), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Persisting Effects Questionnaire and measures of personality traits using the NEO<b>-</b>Five-Factor Inventory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported a sustained reduction of STAI-G scores compared with baseline (least square means (95% CI) = -21.6 (-32.7, -10.4), <i>d</i> = 1.04, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for those who received LSD in the first period (94 weeks after the last LSD treatment) and -16.5 (-26.2, -6.8), <i>d</i> = 1.02, <i>P</i> < 0.05, for those who received LSD in the second period (68 weeks after the last LSD treatment)). Similar effects were observed for comorbid depression with change from baseline BDI scores of -8.1 (-13.2, -3.1), <i>d</i> = 0.71, <i>P</i> < 0.01, and -8.9 (-12.9, -4.9), <i>d</i> = 1.21, <i>P</i> < 0.01, for the LSD-first and placebo-first groups, respectively. Personality trait neuroticism decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and trait extraversion increased (<i>P</i> < 0.01) compared with study inclusion. Individuals attributed positive long-term effects to the psychedelic experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients reported sustained long-term effects of LSD-assisted therapy for anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.99","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety disorders are a major public health burden with limited treatment options.

Aims: We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)-assisted therapy in patients with anxiety with or without life-threatening illness.

Method: This study was an a priori-planned long-term follow-up of an investigator-initiated, two-centre trial that used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, random-order, crossover design with two sessions with either oral LSD (200 μg) or placebo per period. Participants (n = 39) were followed up 1 year after the end-of-study visit to assess symptoms of anxiety, depression and long-term effects of psychedelics using Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Global (STAI-G), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Persisting Effects Questionnaire and measures of personality traits using the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory.

Results: Participants reported a sustained reduction of STAI-G scores compared with baseline (least square means (95% CI) = -21.6 (-32.7, -10.4), d = 1.04, P < 0.001, for those who received LSD in the first period (94 weeks after the last LSD treatment) and -16.5 (-26.2, -6.8), d = 1.02, P < 0.05, for those who received LSD in the second period (68 weeks after the last LSD treatment)). Similar effects were observed for comorbid depression with change from baseline BDI scores of -8.1 (-13.2, -3.1), d = 0.71, P < 0.01, and -8.9 (-12.9, -4.9), d = 1.21, P < 0.01, for the LSD-first and placebo-first groups, respectively. Personality trait neuroticism decreased (P < 0.0001) and trait extraversion increased (P < 0.01) compared with study inclusion. Individuals attributed positive long-term effects to the psychedelic experience.

Conclusions: Patients reported sustained long-term effects of LSD-assisted therapy for anxiety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑症患者的 LSD 辅助疗法:开放标签前瞻性 12 个月随访。
背景:目的:我们研究了麦角酰二乙胺(LSD)辅助疗法对患有或不患有危及生命疾病的焦虑症患者的长期安全性和有效性:该试验采用双盲、安慰剂对照、两期、随机顺序、交叉设计,每期口服 LSD(200 μg)或安慰剂两次。研究结束一年后,对参与者(39 人)进行随访,使用斯皮尔伯格状态-特质焦虑量表-全球(STAI-G)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、持续效应问卷和 NEO 五因子量表测量人格特质,评估焦虑、抑郁症状和迷幻药的长期影响:与基线相比,参与者的 STAI-G 分数持续降低(最小平方均值 (95% CI) = -21.6 (-32.7, -10.4),d = 1.04,P < 0.001,适用于在第一阶段(最后一次 LSD 治疗后 94 周)接受 LSD 治疗的患者;d = 1.02,P < 0.05,适用于在第二阶段(最后一次 LSD 治疗后 68 周)接受 LSD 治疗的患者)。在合并抑郁症方面也观察到类似的效果,先接受 LSD 治疗组和先接受安慰剂治疗组的 BDI 评分与基线相比的变化分别为 -8.1 (-13.2, -3.1), d = 0.71, P < 0.01 和 -8.9 (-12.9, -4.9), d = 1.21, P < 0.01。与纳入研究相比,人格特质神经质减少(P < 0.0001),特质外向性增加(P < 0.01)。患者认为迷幻体验产生了积极的长期效果:患者报告称,迷幻剂辅助治疗焦虑症具有持续的长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
期刊最新文献
Detection of suicidality from medical text using privacy-preserving large language models. Breast cancer risk among women with schizophrenia and association with duration of antipsychotic use: population-based cohort study in South Korea. Equal, equitable or exacerbating inequalities: patterns and predictors of social prescribing referrals in 160 128 UK patients. Apotychiaphobia: should there be a term for fear of miscarriage? Association between dietary fat intake and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: Mendelian randomisation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1