Similar performance in sound localisation with unsynchronised and synchronised automatic gain controls in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2383700
Peter Schleich, Christian Wirtz, Reinhold Schatzer, Peter Nopp
{"title":"Similar performance in sound localisation with unsynchronised and synchronised automatic gain controls in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.","authors":"Peter Schleich, Christian Wirtz, Reinhold Schatzer, Peter Nopp","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2383700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>One proposed method to improve sound localisation for bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users is to synchronise the automatic gain control (AGC) of both audio processors. In this study we tested whether AGC synchronisation in a dual-loop front-end processing scheme with a 3:1 compression ratio improves sound localisation acuity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Source identification in the frontal hemifield was tested in in an anechoic chamber as a function of (roving) presentation level. Three different methods of AGC synchronisation were compared to the standard unsynchronised approach. Both root mean square error (RMSE) and signed bias were calculated to evaluate sound localisation in the horizontal plane.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Six BiCI users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the three AGC synchronisation methods yielded significant improvements in either localisation error or bias, neither across presentation levels nor for individual presentation levels. For synchronised AGC, the pooled mean (standard deviation) localisation error of the three synchronisation methods was 24.7 (5.8) degrees RMSE, for unsynchronised AGC it was 27.4 (7.5) degrees. The localisation bias was 5.1 (5.5) degrees for synchronised AGC and 5.0 (3.8) for unsynchronised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings do not support the hypothesis that the tested AGC synchronisation configurations improves localisation acuity in bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2383700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: One proposed method to improve sound localisation for bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users is to synchronise the automatic gain control (AGC) of both audio processors. In this study we tested whether AGC synchronisation in a dual-loop front-end processing scheme with a 3:1 compression ratio improves sound localisation acuity.

Design: Source identification in the frontal hemifield was tested in in an anechoic chamber as a function of (roving) presentation level. Three different methods of AGC synchronisation were compared to the standard unsynchronised approach. Both root mean square error (RMSE) and signed bias were calculated to evaluate sound localisation in the horizontal plane.

Study sample: Six BiCI users.

Results: None of the three AGC synchronisation methods yielded significant improvements in either localisation error or bias, neither across presentation levels nor for individual presentation levels. For synchronised AGC, the pooled mean (standard deviation) localisation error of the three synchronisation methods was 24.7 (5.8) degrees RMSE, for unsynchronised AGC it was 27.4 (7.5) degrees. The localisation bias was 5.1 (5.5) degrees for synchronised AGC and 5.0 (3.8) for unsynchronised.

Conclusions: These findings do not support the hypothesis that the tested AGC synchronisation configurations improves localisation acuity in bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双侧人工耳蜗植入者在使用非同步和同步自动增益控制进行声音定位时表现相似。
目的:改善双侧人工耳蜗(BiCI)用户声音定位的一种方法是同步两个音频处理器的自动增益控制(AGC)。在这项研究中,我们测试了在压缩比为 3:1 的双回路前端处理方案中同步 AGC 是否能提高声音定位的敏锐度:设计:在消声室中测试额叶半场的声源识别与(巡回)呈现水平的关系。将三种不同的 AGC 同步方法与标准非同步方法进行了比较。通过计算均方根误差(RMSE)和符号偏差来评估水平面上的声音定位:研究样本:六名 BiCI 用户:结果:三种 AGC 同步方法均未显著改善定位误差或偏差,无论是跨呈现水平还是单个呈现水平。对于同步 AGC,三种同步方法的集合平均(标准偏差)定位误差为 24.7 (5.8) 度 RMSE,对于非同步 AGC,则为 27.4 (7.5) 度。同步 AGC 的定位偏差为 5.1 (5.5) 度,非同步 AGC 为 5.0 (3.8)度:这些研究结果并不支持所测试的 AGC 同步配置可提高 MED-EL 人工耳蜗双侧用户定位敏锐度的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1