Extreme Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Case Series of Procedures Requiring Five or More Access Tracts.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1089/end.2023.0688
Joshua Altschuler, Kavita Gupta, Shokhi Goel, Anna Ricapito, Raymond Khargi, Alan J Yaghoubian, Blair Gallante, Johnathan A Khusid, Roman Shimonov, Laura Horodyski, Matthew Mason, Nachiketh S Prakash, William Atallah, David Mikhail, Robert Marcovich, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"Extreme Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Case Series of Procedures Requiring Five or More Access Tracts.","authors":"Joshua Altschuler, Kavita Gupta, Shokhi Goel, Anna Ricapito, Raymond Khargi, Alan J Yaghoubian, Blair Gallante, Johnathan A Khusid, Roman Shimonov, Laura Horodyski, Matthew Mason, Nachiketh S Prakash, William Atallah, David Mikhail, Robert Marcovich, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1089/end.2023.0688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the gold standard treatment for patients with complete staghorn stones, for which multiple access tracts may be required. In this study, we describe a series of patients undergoing PCNL with a minimum of five dilated access tracts. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of 10 patients with complete staghorn stones who underwent PCNL requiring five or more access tracts. We recorded patient demographics, stone characteristics postoperative complications, and stone-free rates (SFRs). The primary endpoint was any postoperative complication. Secondary endpoints included SFR, operative time, and length of stay. SFR was defined as absence of stones or residual fragments <4 mm. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 10 patients from two institutions were included. Access tract number ranged from 5 to 11, and median stone volume was 233,042 mm<sup>3</sup>. Seven patients (70%) experienced postoperative complications, ranging from Clavien II to IVa. Three patients (30%) required blood transfusions. Median operative time was 312 minutes ranging from 180 to 560 minutes. Five patients (50%) were stone-free after the initial procedure. Of those with residual fragments, 4 (40%) required reoperation to be rendered stone-free. Median length of stay was 2.5 days, with a range of 1-6 days. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients undergoing PCNL with five or more access tracts reported to date. This study confirms that PCNL with five or more tracts is feasible and relatively safe, albeit with a high rate of complications in the immediate postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the gold standard treatment for patients with complete staghorn stones, for which multiple access tracts may be required. In this study, we describe a series of patients undergoing PCNL with a minimum of five dilated access tracts. Materials and Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of 10 patients with complete staghorn stones who underwent PCNL requiring five or more access tracts. We recorded patient demographics, stone characteristics postoperative complications, and stone-free rates (SFRs). The primary endpoint was any postoperative complication. Secondary endpoints included SFR, operative time, and length of stay. SFR was defined as absence of stones or residual fragments <4 mm. Results: A total of 10 patients from two institutions were included. Access tract number ranged from 5 to 11, and median stone volume was 233,042 mm3. Seven patients (70%) experienced postoperative complications, ranging from Clavien II to IVa. Three patients (30%) required blood transfusions. Median operative time was 312 minutes ranging from 180 to 560 minutes. Five patients (50%) were stone-free after the initial procedure. Of those with residual fragments, 4 (40%) required reoperation to be rendered stone-free. Median length of stay was 2.5 days, with a range of 1-6 days. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients undergoing PCNL with five or more access tracts reported to date. This study confirms that PCNL with five or more tracts is feasible and relatively safe, albeit with a high rate of complications in the immediate postoperative period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极限经皮肾镜碎石术:需要五条或更多通路的手术病例系列。
导言:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)仍是治疗完全性鹿角状结石患者的金标准疗法,可能需要多条入路。在本研究中,我们描述了一系列接受经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的患者,他们至少有 5 条扩张的通路:我们对 10 位接受 PCNL 手术的完全性鹿角状结石患者进行了多机构回顾性研究,这些患者需要 5 个或更多的通路。我们记录了患者的人口统计学特征、结石特征、术后并发症和无结石率。主要终点是术后并发症。次要终点包括绝对和相对无石率、手术时间和住院时间。绝对无结石率是指完全没有残余结石碎片,而相对无结石率是指没有小于4毫米的残余结石碎片:结果:纳入了来自两家机构的 10 名患者。通路数量从 5 到 11 不等,结石体积中位数为 233,042 立方毫米。七名患者(70%)出现了术后并发症,范围从Clavien II到IVa不等。三名患者(30%)需要输血。手术时间中位数为 312 分钟,从 180 分钟到 560 分钟不等。绝对无结石率为30%,相对无结石率为50%。在有残余结石的患者中,有4人(40%)需要再次手术才能清除结石。住院时间中位数为2.5天,1至6天不等:据我们所知,这是迄今为止报道的最大规模的 5 条或更多通路 PCNL 患者系列。这项研究证实,使用 5 条或更多通路进行 PCNL 是可行的,而且相对安全,尽管术后初期并发症发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Safety and Efficacy Between Anterior and Posterior Calyceal Entry in Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Does Incision Location Matter? Analysis of Single-Port Cosmesis in Urologic Reconstructive Surgery. Bio of Pankaj N Maheshwari, MS, DNB, MCh, FRCS. Digital Flexible Ureteroscope: Evaluating Factors Responsible for Damage and Implementing a Mandatory Certification Program for Usage. Impact of Residual Stone Fragments on Risk of Unplanned Stone Events Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1