Management of Kidney Stones in Pregnancy: A Worldwide Survey of Practice Patterns.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0012
Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Michelle J Semins, Christian Seitz, Amy Krambeck, Etienne Xavier Keller, Niall F Davis, Lazaros Tzelves, Robert Geraghty, Christian Beisland, Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Ewa Bres-Niewada, B M Zeeshan Hameed, Vineet Gauhar, Pablo Contreras, Andreas Skolarikos, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Management of Kidney Stones in Pregnancy: A Worldwide Survey of Practice Patterns.","authors":"Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Michelle J Semins, Christian Seitz, Amy Krambeck, Etienne Xavier Keller, Niall F Davis, Lazaros Tzelves, Robert Geraghty, Christian Beisland, Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Ewa Bres-Niewada, B M Zeeshan Hameed, Vineet Gauhar, Pablo Contreras, Andreas Skolarikos, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Kidney stones in pregnant is not a common emergency, but it is one that is extremely challenging to manage. There exists no previous survey, which maps the different practice patterns adopted. Our aim was to deliver a survey to evaluate the current status of practice patterns across different parts of the world regarding the management of stone disease in pregnancy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Through an iterative process, 19-item survey was devised. This contained the following five sections: (1) Demographics, (2) General items, (3) Diagnosis and Imaging, (4) Initial management, (5) Surgery. It was disseminated via social media and email chains. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 355 responses were collected, and the majority (66.2%) reported no established hospital protocol for stones in pregnancy. Ultrasound was the most popular first line imaging choice (89.9%) but 8% would choose non-contrast CT. The latter was also chosen as second line choicer in 34.6% as opposed to magnetic resonance imaging. A large proportion (42.5%) had requested CT in pregnancy previously. With equivocal ultra sound results, only 19.4% would proceed to ureteroscopy (URS) but 40.9% would opt for CT. Twenty-four-48 hours were the most popular (37.6%) time period to observe before surgical intervention. Ureteral stent and nephrostomy were regarded as equally effective, and 6 weeks was most popular frequency for an exchange. Most do not use fetal heart rate monitoring intraoperatively. A total of 3.94% had previously performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy during pregnancy. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Practice patterns vary widely for suspected kidney stones in pregnancy and use of CT appears increasingly popular. This includes when faced with equivocal ultrasound results and instead of proceeding to ureteroscopy. Most hospitals lack an established management protocol for this scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney stones in pregnant is not a common emergency, but it is one that is extremely challenging to manage. There exists no previous survey, which maps the different practice patterns adopted. Our aim was to deliver a survey to evaluate the current status of practice patterns across different parts of the world regarding the management of stone disease in pregnancy. Methods: Through an iterative process, 19-item survey was devised. This contained the following five sections: (1) Demographics, (2) General items, (3) Diagnosis and Imaging, (4) Initial management, (5) Surgery. It was disseminated via social media and email chains. Results: A total of 355 responses were collected, and the majority (66.2%) reported no established hospital protocol for stones in pregnancy. Ultrasound was the most popular first line imaging choice (89.9%) but 8% would choose non-contrast CT. The latter was also chosen as second line choicer in 34.6% as opposed to magnetic resonance imaging. A large proportion (42.5%) had requested CT in pregnancy previously. With equivocal ultra sound results, only 19.4% would proceed to ureteroscopy (URS) but 40.9% would opt for CT. Twenty-four-48 hours were the most popular (37.6%) time period to observe before surgical intervention. Ureteral stent and nephrostomy were regarded as equally effective, and 6 weeks was most popular frequency for an exchange. Most do not use fetal heart rate monitoring intraoperatively. A total of 3.94% had previously performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy during pregnancy. Conclusion: Practice patterns vary widely for suspected kidney stones in pregnancy and use of CT appears increasingly popular. This includes when faced with equivocal ultrasound results and instead of proceeding to ureteroscopy. Most hospitals lack an established management protocol for this scenario.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期肾结石的治疗:全球实践模式调查。
导言 怀孕期肾结石并非常见急症,但处理起来却极具挑战性。目前还没有任何一项调查能反映出所采用的不同实践模式。我们的目的是开展一项调查,以评估世界各地在妊娠期结石病治疗方面的实践模式现状。方法 通过反复推敲,我们设计出了 19 个项目的调查表。其中包括以下五个部分:1.人口统计学 2. 一般项目 3.诊断和成像 4.初始管理 5.手术。通过社交媒体和电子邮件链进行传播。结果 共收集到 355 份回复,其中大多数(66.2%)表示医院没有针对妊娠期结石的既定方案。超声波是最受欢迎的一线成像选择(89.9%),但也有 8%的人会选择无对比 CT。与核磁共振成像相比,34.6%的人选择后者作为二线选择。很大一部分人(42.5%)在妊娠期曾要求进行 CT 检查。如果 US 结果不明确,只有 19.4% 的人会继续进行输尿管镜检查,但 40.9% 的人会选择 CT。手术干预前最常观察的时间段是 24-48 小时(37.6%)。输尿管支架和肾造瘘术被认为同样有效。大多数人术中不使用胎心率监测。3.94%的患者曾在妊娠期间进行过 PCNL。结论 妊娠期疑似肾结石的诊疗模式差异很大,CT 的使用似乎越来越普遍。这包括在超声检查结果不明确的情况下,不进行输尿管镜检查。大多数医院都缺乏针对这种情况的既定管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Still Using Only ChatGPT? The Comparison of Five Different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots' Answers to the Most Common Questions About Kidney Stones. Zero-Intrarenal Pressure Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for One-Stage Treatment of Non-Acute Infectious Calculous Pyonephrosis: A Strategy to Avert Sepsis. The Impact of External Sphincter Grading after Early Apical Release Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence. Does Blacklight Illumination Improve Speed and Accuracy of Foot Pedal Activation in the Low-Light Operating Room? Assessment of Holmium:YAG, pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. In vitro study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1