To Treat or not to Treat? The Fate of Patients with Intermittent Claudication Following Different Therapeutic Options.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2506229
Elpiniki Tsolaki, Luca Traina, Caterina Savriè, Franco Guerzoni, Nicola Napoli, Roberto Manfredini, Maria Cristina Taddia, Fabio Manfredini, Nicola Lamberti
{"title":"To Treat or not to Treat? The Fate of Patients with Intermittent Claudication Following Different Therapeutic Options.","authors":"Elpiniki Tsolaki, Luca Traina, Caterina Savriè, Franco Guerzoni, Nicola Napoli, Roberto Manfredini, Maria Cristina Taddia, Fabio Manfredini, Nicola Lamberti","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2506229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is recognized as a significant contributor to the public health burden in the cardiovascular field and has a significant rate of morbidity and mortality. In the intermediate stages, exercise therapy is recommended by the guidelines, although supervised programs are scarcely available. This single-center observational study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with PAD and claudication receiving optimal medical care and follow-up or revascularization procedures or structured home-based exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 1590 PAD patients with claudication were assessed at the Vascular Surgery Unit between 2008 and 2017. Based on the findings of the recruitment visit, patients were assigned to one of the three following groups according to the available guidelines: Revascularization (Rev), structured exercise therapy (Ex), or control (Co). The exercise program was prescribed at the hospital and executed at home with two daily 10-minute interval walking sessions at a pain-free speed. The number and date of deaths, all-cause hospitalizations, and peripheral revascularizations for 5 years were collected from the Emilia-Romagna regional database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At entry, 137 patients underwent revascularization; 1087 patients were included in the Ex group, and 366 were included in the Co group. At baseline, patients in the Rev group were significantly younger and had fewer comorbidities (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). A propensity score matching analysis was performed, and three balanced subgroups of 119 patients were each created. The mortality rate was significantly (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) greater in the Co (45%) group than in the Rev (11%) and Ex (11%) groups, as was the incidence of all-cause hospitalizations (Co: 95%; Rev 56%; Ex 60%; <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). There were no differences in peripheral revascularizations (Co: 19%; Rev: 17%; Ex 11%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In PAD patients with claudication, both revascularization procedures and structured home-based exercise sessions are associated with better long-term clinical outcomes than walking advice and follow-up only.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is recognized as a significant contributor to the public health burden in the cardiovascular field and has a significant rate of morbidity and mortality. In the intermediate stages, exercise therapy is recommended by the guidelines, although supervised programs are scarcely available. This single-center observational study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with PAD and claudication receiving optimal medical care and follow-up or revascularization procedures or structured home-based exercise.

Methods: The records of 1590 PAD patients with claudication were assessed at the Vascular Surgery Unit between 2008 and 2017. Based on the findings of the recruitment visit, patients were assigned to one of the three following groups according to the available guidelines: Revascularization (Rev), structured exercise therapy (Ex), or control (Co). The exercise program was prescribed at the hospital and executed at home with two daily 10-minute interval walking sessions at a pain-free speed. The number and date of deaths, all-cause hospitalizations, and peripheral revascularizations for 5 years were collected from the Emilia-Romagna regional database.

Results: At entry, 137 patients underwent revascularization; 1087 patients were included in the Ex group, and 366 were included in the Co group. At baseline, patients in the Rev group were significantly younger and had fewer comorbidities (p < 0.001). A propensity score matching analysis was performed, and three balanced subgroups of 119 patients were each created. The mortality rate was significantly (p < 0.001) greater in the Co (45%) group than in the Rev (11%) and Ex (11%) groups, as was the incidence of all-cause hospitalizations (Co: 95%; Rev 56%; Ex 60%; p < 0.001). There were no differences in peripheral revascularizations (Co: 19%; Rev: 17%; Ex 11%).

Conclusions: In PAD patients with claudication, both revascularization procedures and structured home-based exercise sessions are associated with better long-term clinical outcomes than walking advice and follow-up only.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗还是不治疗?间歇性跛行患者采用不同治疗方案后的命运。
背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)被认为是心血管领域公共卫生负担的一个重要因素,其发病率和死亡率都很高。在疾病的中期阶段,指南推荐进行运动疗法,但目前很少有指导性计划。这项单中心观察性研究旨在评估PAD和跛行患者接受最佳医疗护理和随访、血管重建手术或有组织的家庭锻炼后的长期疗效:2008年至2017年间,血管外科对1590名伴有跛行的PAD患者的病历进行了评估。根据招募访问的结果,按照现有指南将患者分配到以下三组中的一组:血管重建组(Rev)、结构化运动疗法组(Ex)或对照组(Co)。患者在医院接受运动治疗,并在家中以无痛的速度进行每天两次、每次 10 分钟的间歇性步行。研究人员从艾米利亚-罗马涅地区数据库中收集了5年内死亡、全因住院和外周血管再造的人数和日期:入组时,137 名患者接受了血管再通手术;1087 名患者被纳入 Ex 组,366 名患者被纳入 Co 组。基线时,Rev 组患者明显更年轻,合并症更少(P 0.001)。进行倾向评分匹配分析后,创建了三个平衡亚组,每组 119 名患者。Co组的死亡率(45%)明显高于Rev组(11%)和Ex组(11%)(P 0.001),全因住院率也是如此(Co:95%;Rev:56%;Ex:60%;P 0.001)。外周血管再通率没有差异(Co:19%;Rev:17%;Ex:11%):结论:对于有跛行的 PAD 患者,血管再通手术和有组织的家庭锻炼课程与仅步行建议和随访相比,具有更好的长期临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances in the Wearable Devices for Monitoring and Management of Heart Failure. Study on the Predictive Value of a Pulmonary Edema Imaging Score for Delayed Extubation in Patients after Heart Valve Surgery on Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Improvement of the Immunity System Through Sports: Novel Regulatory Mechanisms for Hypertension. Prognostic Effects of Operation Age for Pediatric Patients with Supravalvar Aortic Stenosis. Association between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and New-Onset In-Hospital Heart Failure in Patients with STEMI after Primary PCI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1