EMS Paramedics and Law Enforcement Officers' Experiences with Joint-Response Efforts on Suspected Opioid Overdose Calls: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1007/s11414-024-09895-2
Kimberly Menendez, Riley Curie, Tracy Bales, Kelsey Greenfield, Kathleen A Moore
{"title":"EMS Paramedics and Law Enforcement Officers' Experiences with Joint-Response Efforts on Suspected Opioid Overdose Calls: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Kimberly Menendez, Riley Curie, Tracy Bales, Kelsey Greenfield, Kathleen A Moore","doi":"10.1007/s11414-024-09895-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, the opioid crisis remains a nationwide public health emergency. Narcan laws have increased medical collaboration between emergency medical services (EMS) paramedics and law enforcement officers (LEOs), yet research on joint opioid-response efforts with these first responders remains underexplored. Using a phenomenological approach, this study explores EMS paramedics and LEOs' experiences with joint-response efforts on suspected opioid overdose calls amidst the ongoing opioid crisis. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 first responders (n = 8 EMS paramedics; n = 6 LEOs) from a large Central Florida emergency services district covering urban, suburban, and rural areas. Four major themes emerged: (1) facilitators to joint-response efforts; (2) barriers to joint-response efforts; (3) concerns for patient co-occurring behavioral health conditions; and (4) perceived solutions. Overall, participants described mutual respect, reliance, and communication as key facilitators, while barriers included conflicting on-scene priorities and differences in Narcan protocols. Concerns for co-occurring behavioral health (i.e., addiction and mental health) conditions among overdose patients included difficulties in assessing mental health and the availability of wraparound services, yet these concerns remained secondary to medical treatment during an opioid-related emergency. Key solutions included enhanced Narcan training for LEOs and increased availability of behavioral health services for long-term patient care. This research contributes to existing literature on opioid overdose response by specifically examining joint-response efforts between EMS paramedics and LEOs. These findings may be applicable to other partnering agencies such as mental health crisis teams and should be explored across behavioral health collaborations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09895-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, the opioid crisis remains a nationwide public health emergency. Narcan laws have increased medical collaboration between emergency medical services (EMS) paramedics and law enforcement officers (LEOs), yet research on joint opioid-response efforts with these first responders remains underexplored. Using a phenomenological approach, this study explores EMS paramedics and LEOs' experiences with joint-response efforts on suspected opioid overdose calls amidst the ongoing opioid crisis. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 first responders (n = 8 EMS paramedics; n = 6 LEOs) from a large Central Florida emergency services district covering urban, suburban, and rural areas. Four major themes emerged: (1) facilitators to joint-response efforts; (2) barriers to joint-response efforts; (3) concerns for patient co-occurring behavioral health conditions; and (4) perceived solutions. Overall, participants described mutual respect, reliance, and communication as key facilitators, while barriers included conflicting on-scene priorities and differences in Narcan protocols. Concerns for co-occurring behavioral health (i.e., addiction and mental health) conditions among overdose patients included difficulties in assessing mental health and the availability of wraparound services, yet these concerns remained secondary to medical treatment during an opioid-related emergency. Key solutions included enhanced Narcan training for LEOs and increased availability of behavioral health services for long-term patient care. This research contributes to existing literature on opioid overdose response by specifically examining joint-response efforts between EMS paramedics and LEOs. These findings may be applicable to other partnering agencies such as mental health crisis teams and should be explored across behavioral health collaborations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急救辅助人员和执法人员在疑似阿片类药物过量呼叫中的联合响应经验:定性研究。
在美国,阿片类药物危机仍然是一个全国性的公共卫生紧急事件。Narcan 法案加强了紧急医疗服务(EMS)护理人员与执法人员之间的医疗合作,但与这些第一响应者联合应对阿片类药物的研究仍然不足。本研究采用现象学方法,探讨了在持续的阿片类药物危机中,急救服务辅助人员和执法人员联合应对疑似阿片类药物过量呼叫的经验。研究人员对佛罗里达州中部一个大型急救服务区的 14 名急救人员(n = 8 名急救辅助人员;n = 6 名地方执法人员)进行了半结构化访谈,访谈范围包括城市、郊区和农村地区。访谈中出现了四大主题:(1) 联合响应工作的促进因素;(2) 联合响应工作的障碍;(3) 对患者并发行为健康问题的关注;以及 (4) 感知到的解决方案。总体而言,参与者认为相互尊重、依赖和沟通是关键的促进因素,而障碍则包括现场优先事项的冲突和 Narcan 协议的差异。对吸毒过量患者并发行为健康(即成瘾和精神健康)问题的关注包括评估精神健康和提供综合服务方面的困难,但在阿片类药物相关紧急事件中,这些问题仍是医疗治疗的次要问题。主要的解决方案包括加强对地方执法人员的 Narcan 培训,以及增加行为健康服务的可用性,以便对患者进行长期护理。这项研究通过专门研究急救医疗辅助人员和地方急救人员之间的联合响应工作,为现有的阿片类药物过量响应文献做出了贡献。这些发现可能适用于其他合作机构,如心理健康危机小组,并应在行为健康合作中加以探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
期刊最新文献
Relational Complexity of the Near-Age Peer Support Provider Role in Youth and Young Adult Community Mental Health Settings. Clinical Variables Associated with Successful Treatment of Depression or Anxiety in Collaborative Care. A Qualitative Investigation of Characteristics Impacting Clinical Decision-Making in Integrated Behavioral Health Care. Descriptive Trends in Medicaid Antipsychotic Prescription Claims and Expenditures, 2016 - 2021. Looking Toward the Future of Integrated Care: History, Developments, and Opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1