Home health utilization in the Veterans Health Administration: Are there rural and urban differences?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1111/jrh.12865
Heather Davila, Bradely Mayfield, Michelle A Mengeling, Andrea Holcombe, Kelly R Miell, Erin Jaske, William Iverson, Tammy Walkner, Greg Stewart, Samantha Solimeo
{"title":"Home health utilization in the Veterans Health Administration: Are there rural and urban differences?","authors":"Heather Davila, Bradely Mayfield, Michelle A Mengeling, Andrea Holcombe, Kelly R Miell, Erin Jaske, William Iverson, Tammy Walkner, Greg Stewart, Samantha Solimeo","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Growing numbers of older adults need home health care, yhese services may be more difficult to access for rural Veterans, who represent one-third of Veterans Health Administration (VA) enrollees. Our objective was to examine whether home health use differs within VA based on rurality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined national VA administrative data for 2019-2021 (January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021) among Veterans ages ≥65 years. Using descriptive and multivariable analyses, we assessed whether rural versus urban Veterans differed in (1) the likelihood of using any home health and (2) for those who received ≥1 visit, number of visits received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among home health users (n = 107,229, 33.1% rural), rural and urban Veterans were similar in age (77.0 vs. 77.2 years). Rural Veterans were less likely to be highly frail (38.9% rural vs. 40.4% urban) or diagnosed with dementia (13.5% vs. 17.6%). After adjusting for Veterans' characteristics, rural Veterans were more likely to receive any home health (odds ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07, 1.13). Among Veterans who received ≥1 home health visit, rurality was associated with considerably fewer expected visits (incident rate ratio: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although rural Veterans were more likely than urban Veterans to receive any home health services, they received considerably fewer home health visits. This difference may represent an access issue for rural Veterans. Future research is needed to identify reasons for these differences and develop strategies to ensure rural Veterans' care needs are equitability addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Growing numbers of older adults need home health care, yhese services may be more difficult to access for rural Veterans, who represent one-third of Veterans Health Administration (VA) enrollees. Our objective was to examine whether home health use differs within VA based on rurality.

Methods: We examined national VA administrative data for 2019-2021 (January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021) among Veterans ages ≥65 years. Using descriptive and multivariable analyses, we assessed whether rural versus urban Veterans differed in (1) the likelihood of using any home health and (2) for those who received ≥1 visit, number of visits received.

Results: Among home health users (n = 107,229, 33.1% rural), rural and urban Veterans were similar in age (77.0 vs. 77.2 years). Rural Veterans were less likely to be highly frail (38.9% rural vs. 40.4% urban) or diagnosed with dementia (13.5% vs. 17.6%). After adjusting for Veterans' characteristics, rural Veterans were more likely to receive any home health (odds ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07, 1.13). Among Veterans who received ≥1 home health visit, rurality was associated with considerably fewer expected visits (incident rate ratio: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.72).

Conclusions: Although rural Veterans were more likely than urban Veterans to receive any home health services, they received considerably fewer home health visits. This difference may represent an access issue for rural Veterans. Future research is needed to identify reasons for these differences and develop strategies to ensure rural Veterans' care needs are equitability addressed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍军人健康管理局的家庭医疗使用情况:农村和城市是否存在差异?
目的:越来越多的老年人需要家庭健康护理,但对于占退伍军人健康管理局(VA)注册人数三分之一的农村退伍军人来说,可能更难获得这些服务。我们的目标是研究在退伍军人医疗管理局内部,家庭医疗的使用情况是否因农村地区而有所不同:我们研究了 2019-2021 年(2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日)退伍军人中年龄≥65 岁的退伍军人的全国行政数据。通过描述性分析和多变量分析,我们评估了农村退伍军人与城市退伍军人在以下方面是否存在差异:(1)使用任何居家医疗服务的可能性;(2)对于那些接受过≥1 次就诊的退伍军人而言,接受过的就诊次数:在家庭医疗用户(n = 107,229 人,33.1% 为农村退伍军人)中,农村和城市退伍军人的年龄相似(77.0 岁对 77.2 岁)。农村退伍军人身体虚弱(农村 38.9% 对城市 40.4%)或被诊断出患有痴呆症(13.5% 对 17.6%)的可能性较小。在对退伍军人的特征进行调整后,农村退伍军人更有可能接受任何居家医疗服务(几率比:1.10;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.07, 1.13)。在接受过≥1 次居家医疗访问的退伍军人中,农村地区的预期访问次数要少得多(事故发生率比:0.70;95% 置信区间:0.68, 0.72):尽管农村退伍军人比城市退伍军人更有可能接受任何家庭医疗服务,但他们接受的家庭医疗就诊次数要少得多。这一差异可能代表了农村退伍军人的就医问题。未来的研究需要找出造成这些差异的原因,并制定策略确保农村退伍军人的护理需求得到公平的解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and profitability following rural hospital mergers and acquisitions. Community responses and adaptations following the closure of a rural pharmacy and primary care facility. Weight status underestimation and weight management goals among adults in the rural South of the United States. Social needs and health outcomes in two rural Veteran populations. Association between obesogenic environments and childhood overweight/obesity across the United States: Differences by rurality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1