Outcomes of inferior oblique muscle myectomy with tucking into Tenon's capsule, cohort prospective study.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Strabismus Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1080/09273972.2024.2381797
Saif Alobaisi, Hana A Almuhawas, Saja A Alhoshan, Sulaiman Aldakhil, Bashair N Alnasser
{"title":"Outcomes of inferior oblique muscle myectomy with tucking into Tenon's capsule, cohort prospective study.","authors":"Saif Alobaisi, Hana A Almuhawas, Saja A Alhoshan, Sulaiman Aldakhil, Bashair N Alnasser","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2024.2381797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Inferior oblique muscle overaction (IOOA) is a prevalent ocular muscle motility disorder. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes and impact of IO muscle myectomy with and without tucking the proximal end of the muscle into Tenon's capsule in two surgical groups as a treatment for IOOA. <i>Methods</i>: Randomized cohort study that involves two surgical groups. A total of 33 patients (55 eyes). Patients were randomly divided into two groups: first group underwent myectomy without tucking the proximal end of the muscle, whereas the second group underwent myectomy with tucking of the proximal end of the muscle. Each patient had four visits. During each visit, each patient had a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Surgical success was defined as IOOA grade range of 0 to + 1 and correction of hypertropia in primary gaze. <i>Results</i>: The median age was 6 years. Sixteen (48.5%) patients underwent IO muscle myectomy with tucking, while 17 (51.5%) had an IO myectomy without tucking. Both the tucking and without tucking groups showed reductions in the angles of deviations, but there was no significant difference between the groups at baseline or postoperatively at 6 months. The success rate was 92.85% for the tucking group and 92.59% for the without tucking group. <i>Conclusion</i>: The study suggests that both surgical techniques are effective in correcting IOOA and associated HT, without any clear benefits of the addition of tucking. Ultimately, the two surgical techniques are equally effective, and the choice of surgical technique remains a personal preference of the surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2024.2381797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inferior oblique muscle overaction (IOOA) is a prevalent ocular muscle motility disorder. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes and impact of IO muscle myectomy with and without tucking the proximal end of the muscle into Tenon's capsule in two surgical groups as a treatment for IOOA. Methods: Randomized cohort study that involves two surgical groups. A total of 33 patients (55 eyes). Patients were randomly divided into two groups: first group underwent myectomy without tucking the proximal end of the muscle, whereas the second group underwent myectomy with tucking of the proximal end of the muscle. Each patient had four visits. During each visit, each patient had a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Surgical success was defined as IOOA grade range of 0 to + 1 and correction of hypertropia in primary gaze. Results: The median age was 6 years. Sixteen (48.5%) patients underwent IO muscle myectomy with tucking, while 17 (51.5%) had an IO myectomy without tucking. Both the tucking and without tucking groups showed reductions in the angles of deviations, but there was no significant difference between the groups at baseline or postoperatively at 6 months. The success rate was 92.85% for the tucking group and 92.59% for the without tucking group. Conclusion: The study suggests that both surgical techniques are effective in correcting IOOA and associated HT, without any clear benefits of the addition of tucking. Ultimately, the two surgical techniques are equally effective, and the choice of surgical technique remains a personal preference of the surgeon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下斜肌肌层切除术与塞入腱鞘囊的结果,前瞻性队列研究。
背景:下斜肌过度运动(IOOA)是一种常见的眼肌运动障碍。本研究旨在调查 IO 肌肉切除术(将肌肉近端塞入 Tenon 胶囊)作为 IOOA 治疗方法的效果和影响。方法:随机队列研究:随机队列研究,包括两个手术组。共 33 名患者(55 只眼睛)。患者被随机分为两组:第一组接受肌肉近端切除术,但不塞入肌肉近端;第二组接受肌肉近端切除术,但塞入肌肉近端。每位患者接受了四次检查。每次就诊时,每位患者都要接受一次全面的眼科检查。手术成功的定义是 IOOA 分级范围在 0 至 + 1 之间,且原发注视时眼球突出得到矫正。结果:中位年龄为 6 岁。16名(48.5%)患者接受了眼球组织肌肉切除术,同时进行了收紧术;17名(51.5%)患者接受了眼球组织肌肉切除术,但未进行收紧术。收紧组和未收紧组的偏角都有所减少,但两组在基线和术后 6 个月时没有显著差异。收紧组的成功率为 92.85%,未收紧组的成功率为 92.59%。结论:该研究表明,两种手术方法都能有效矫正 IOOA 和相关的 HT,但增加收紧术的优势并不明显。归根结底,两种手术方法同样有效,选择哪种手术方法仍是外科医生的个人偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Approach to abnormal head posture. Management of traumatic incomplete lacerating rectus muscle injuries using multimodal imaging approach (ASOCT and CT/MRI). The effect of post-anesthetic administration of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on postoperative agitation of strabismus surgery in children: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Association of smartphones use, ocular symptoms and binocular dysfunctions in adolescents: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Disconjugacies of saccade duration and trajectories in strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1