{"title":"MTML: An Efficient Multitrait Multilocus GWAS Method Based on the Cauchy Combination Test","authors":"Hongping Guo, Tong Li, Yao Shi, Xiao Wang","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202300130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Genome-wide association study (GWAS) by measuring the joint effect of multiple loci on multiple traits, has recently attracted interest, due to the decreased costs of high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies. Previous studies mainly focused on either multilocus models that identify associations with a single trait or multitrait models that scan a single marker at a time. Since these types of models cannot fully utilize the association information, the powers of the tests are usually low. To potentially address this problem, we present here a multitrait multilocus (MTML) modeling framework that implements in three steps: (1) simplify the complex calculation; (2) reduce the model dimension; (3) integrate the joint contribution of single markers to multiple traits by Cauchy combination. The performances of MTML are evaluated and compared with other three published methods by Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation results show that MTML is more powerful for quantitative trait nucleotide detection and robust for various numbers of traits. In the meanwhile, MTML can effectively control type I error rate at a reasonable level. Real data analysis of <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> shows that MTML identifies more pleiotropic genetic associations. Therefore, we conclude that MTML is an efficient GWAS method for joint analysis of multiple quantitative traits. The R package MTML, which facilitates the implementation of the proposed method, is publicly available on GitHub https://github.com/Guohongping/MTML.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"66 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202300130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) by measuring the joint effect of multiple loci on multiple traits, has recently attracted interest, due to the decreased costs of high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies. Previous studies mainly focused on either multilocus models that identify associations with a single trait or multitrait models that scan a single marker at a time. Since these types of models cannot fully utilize the association information, the powers of the tests are usually low. To potentially address this problem, we present here a multitrait multilocus (MTML) modeling framework that implements in three steps: (1) simplify the complex calculation; (2) reduce the model dimension; (3) integrate the joint contribution of single markers to multiple traits by Cauchy combination. The performances of MTML are evaluated and compared with other three published methods by Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation results show that MTML is more powerful for quantitative trait nucleotide detection and robust for various numbers of traits. In the meanwhile, MTML can effectively control type I error rate at a reasonable level. Real data analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana shows that MTML identifies more pleiotropic genetic associations. Therefore, we conclude that MTML is an efficient GWAS method for joint analysis of multiple quantitative traits. The R package MTML, which facilitates the implementation of the proposed method, is publicly available on GitHub https://github.com/Guohongping/MTML.
期刊介绍:
Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.