Urinary Incontinence Care-Seeking Barriers Among Latina Patients: What Are We Missing?

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001555
Anna Pancheshnikov, Bryna J Harrington, Victoria L Handa, Liz I Yanes, Margot Le Neveu, Kristin M Voegtline, Sarah B Olson, Joan L Blomquist, Stephanie Jacobs, Danielle Patterson, Chi Chiung Grace Chen
{"title":"Urinary Incontinence Care-Seeking Barriers Among Latina Patients: What Are We Missing?","authors":"Anna Pancheshnikov, Bryna J Harrington, Victoria L Handa, Liz I Yanes, Margot Le Neveu, Kristin M Voegtline, Sarah B Olson, Joan L Blomquist, Stephanie Jacobs, Danielle Patterson, Chi Chiung Grace Chen","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Latina population is the largest growing ethnic group in the United States with high levels of health disparities in urinary incontinence (UI) treatment and complications rates, which may be due to disproportionately high barriers to UI care-seeking among Latinas.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to compare barriers to UI care-seeking among Latina, non-Latina Black, and non-Latina White patients by utilizing the Barriers to Incontinence Care Seeking Questionnaire (BICS-Q) total scores, and to compare specific barriers utilizing BICS-Q subscales.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, patients accessing primary care were recruited to complete the BICS-Q, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The BICS-Q total and subscale scores were compared among ethnic/racial groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 298 patients were included in the study with 83 Black, 144 Latina, and 71 White participants per self-identified ethnicity/race. The total BICS-Q score was highest for Latina participants, followed by White and Black participants (11.2 vs 8.2 vs 4.9, respectively, P < 0.0001). Latina participants had significantly higher BICS-Q subscale scores compared with Black participants with no significant differences between Latina and White participants. After controlling for potential confounders, Latina ethnicity/race was still associated with a higher BICS-Q score when compared to Black ethnicity/race (P = 0.0077), and lower Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence scores remained independently associated with higher BICS-Q scores (P = 0.0078).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study population, Latina patients and patients with lower UI knowledge experience higher barriers to UI care-seeking compared with Black patients and patients with higher UI knowledge. Addressing these barriers may increase care-seeking and improve health equity in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The Latina population is the largest growing ethnic group in the United States with high levels of health disparities in urinary incontinence (UI) treatment and complications rates, which may be due to disproportionately high barriers to UI care-seeking among Latinas.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare barriers to UI care-seeking among Latina, non-Latina Black, and non-Latina White patients by utilizing the Barriers to Incontinence Care Seeking Questionnaire (BICS-Q) total scores, and to compare specific barriers utilizing BICS-Q subscales.

Study design: In this cross-sectional study, patients accessing primary care were recruited to complete the BICS-Q, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The BICS-Q total and subscale scores were compared among ethnic/racial groups.

Results: A total of 298 patients were included in the study with 83 Black, 144 Latina, and 71 White participants per self-identified ethnicity/race. The total BICS-Q score was highest for Latina participants, followed by White and Black participants (11.2 vs 8.2 vs 4.9, respectively, P < 0.0001). Latina participants had significantly higher BICS-Q subscale scores compared with Black participants with no significant differences between Latina and White participants. After controlling for potential confounders, Latina ethnicity/race was still associated with a higher BICS-Q score when compared to Black ethnicity/race (P = 0.0077), and lower Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence scores remained independently associated with higher BICS-Q scores (P = 0.0078).

Conclusions: In our study population, Latina patients and patients with lower UI knowledge experience higher barriers to UI care-seeking compared with Black patients and patients with higher UI knowledge. Addressing these barriers may increase care-seeking and improve health equity in the field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁裔患者寻求尿失禁护理的障碍:我们遗漏了什么?
重要性:拉丁裔人口是美国增长最快的族群,在尿失禁(UI)治疗和并发症发生率方面存在很大的健康差异,这可能是由于拉丁裔寻求尿失禁护理的障碍过高所致:本研究的目的是通过尿失禁就医障碍问卷(BICS-Q)的总分来比较拉丁裔、非拉丁裔黑人和非拉丁裔白人患者的尿失禁就医障碍,并通过 BICS-Q 的分量表来比较具体障碍:在这项横断面研究中,研究人员招募了接受初级保健服务的患者,让他们填写 BICS-Q、尿失禁国际咨询问卷-简表和尿失禁知识问卷-尿失禁。对不同民族/种族群体的 BICS-Q 总分和分量表得分进行了比较:共有 298 名患者参与了研究,其中黑人 83 人,拉丁裔 144 人,白人 71 人。拉丁裔参与者的 BICS-Q 总分最高,其次是白人和黑人参与者(分别为 11.2 vs 8.2 vs 4.9,P < 0.0001)。拉丁裔参与者的 BICS-Q 分量表得分明显高于黑人参与者,拉丁裔和白人参与者之间没有明显差异。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,拉丁裔/种族与黑人/种族相比仍与较高的 BICS-Q 评分相关(P = 0.0077),较低的脱垂和尿失禁知识问卷-尿失禁评分仍与较高的 BICS-Q 评分独立相关(P = 0.0078):在我们的研究人群中,拉丁裔患者和尿失禁知识水平较低的患者与黑人患者和尿失禁知识水平较高的患者相比,在寻求尿失禁护理时会遇到更多障碍。解决这些障碍可提高就医率并改善该领域的健康公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Ureteral Stent Placement. Implementing a Digital Platform for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections. Unexpected Pathology During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in an Urban Population. Green Cystoscopy: Does Minimizing the Use of Drapes Increase Infection Rates? Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial: KIM Sling With Reusable Trocars Versus TVT Exact Sling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1