Pointing Fingers: Who US Adults Blame for the Opioid Overdose Epidemic.

Yoonsang Kim, Alex Kresovich, Kai MacLean, Phoebe Lamuda, Marie Ngobo-Ekamby, Cedasia McQueen, John Schneider, Harold A Pollack, Bruce G Taylor
{"title":"Pointing Fingers: Who US Adults Blame for the Opioid Overdose Epidemic.","authors":"Yoonsang Kim, Alex Kresovich, Kai MacLean, Phoebe Lamuda, Marie Ngobo-Ekamby, Cedasia McQueen, John Schneider, Harold A Pollack, Bruce G Taylor","doi":"10.1177/29767342241262556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 3 million Americans have an opioid use disorder (OUD), and only a fraction receive treatment. Public opinion is crucial in enacting evidence-based policies. Few studies have examined the public's perception of blame for the ongoing opioid overdose epidemic directed at distinct groups. We assessed US adults' perceived blameworthiness for the epidemic and examined factors that may influence the perceived blameworthiness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national survey in 2022 using the AmeriSpeak® panel to assess US adults' perception of blame toward individuals with an OUD and external contributors. Of the 3335 eligible panel members invited to participate, 1233 (37%) completed the survey. We developed a measure of knowledge and understanding of OUD, with a higher value indicating a greater understanding of the nature of OUD and recovery-including knowledge and beliefs on evidence-based treatment and relapse. We analyzed the relationships between sources of blame, knowledge, and understanding of OUD, and individual-level correlates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher score of knowledge and understanding of OUD was associated with lower odds of blaming individuals with OUD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.51, 1.05]) and greater odds of blaming external contributors: healthcare providers (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = [1.05, 2.12]), pharmaceutical companies (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = [1.50, 3.15]), and health insurance companies (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = [0.97, 2.09]). Those who are female, non-Hispanic White, Democrat, have higher education, or have friends or family who misused opioids tended to score higher in knowledge and understanding of OUD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perceived blameworthiness for the opioid overdose epidemic is related to knowledge and understanding of OUD. Public health campaigns with a bipartisan agenda to increase evidence-informed knowledge about OUD targeting people of color and with lower education may help reduce the blame toward people with an OUD, which in turn may increase support for evidence-informed policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241262556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over 3 million Americans have an opioid use disorder (OUD), and only a fraction receive treatment. Public opinion is crucial in enacting evidence-based policies. Few studies have examined the public's perception of blame for the ongoing opioid overdose epidemic directed at distinct groups. We assessed US adults' perceived blameworthiness for the epidemic and examined factors that may influence the perceived blameworthiness.

Methods: We conducted a national survey in 2022 using the AmeriSpeak® panel to assess US adults' perception of blame toward individuals with an OUD and external contributors. Of the 3335 eligible panel members invited to participate, 1233 (37%) completed the survey. We developed a measure of knowledge and understanding of OUD, with a higher value indicating a greater understanding of the nature of OUD and recovery-including knowledge and beliefs on evidence-based treatment and relapse. We analyzed the relationships between sources of blame, knowledge, and understanding of OUD, and individual-level correlates.

Results: Higher score of knowledge and understanding of OUD was associated with lower odds of blaming individuals with OUD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.51, 1.05]) and greater odds of blaming external contributors: healthcare providers (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = [1.05, 2.12]), pharmaceutical companies (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = [1.50, 3.15]), and health insurance companies (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = [0.97, 2.09]). Those who are female, non-Hispanic White, Democrat, have higher education, or have friends or family who misused opioids tended to score higher in knowledge and understanding of OUD.

Conclusions: Perceived blameworthiness for the opioid overdose epidemic is related to knowledge and understanding of OUD. Public health campaigns with a bipartisan agenda to increase evidence-informed knowledge about OUD targeting people of color and with lower education may help reduce the blame toward people with an OUD, which in turn may increase support for evidence-informed policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指指点点:美国成年人将阿片类药物过量流行归咎于谁?
背景:超过 300 万美国人患有阿片类药物使用障碍 (OUD),但只有一小部分人接受了治疗。公众舆论对于制定循证政策至关重要。对于阿片类药物过量疫情的持续蔓延,很少有研究调查公众对不同群体的责任认知。我们评估了美国成年人对这一流行病的责任感,并研究了可能影响责任感的因素:我们于 2022 年利用 AmeriSpeak® 小组开展了一项全国性调查,以评估美国成年人对 OUD 患者和外部因素的责任感。在受邀参与调查的 3335 名符合条件的小组成员中,有 1233 人(37%)完成了调查。我们对 OUD 的知识和理解进行了测量,测量值越高,表明对 OUD 的性质和康复的理解越深,包括对循证治疗和复发的知识和信念。我们分析了自责来源、对 OUD 的认识和理解之间的关系,以及个人层面的相关因素:结果:对 OUD 的知识和理解得分越高,对 OUD 患者的指责几率越低(几率比 [OR] = 0.73,95% 置信区间 [CI] = [0.51, 1.05]),而责怪外部因素的几率更大:医疗服务提供者(OR = 1.49,95% CI = [1.05,2.12])、制药公司(OR = 2.17,95% CI = [1.50,3.15])和医疗保险公司(OR = 1.42,95% CI = [0.97,2.09])。女性、非西班牙裔白人、民主党人、受过高等教育或有朋友或家人滥用阿片类药物的人在对 OUD 的认识和理解方面得分往往较高:对阿片类药物过量流行的责任感与对 OUD 的认识和理解有关。针对有色人种和教育程度较低的人群开展两党议程的公共卫生运动,以增加对 OUD 的循证知识,可能有助于减少对 OUD 患者的指责,进而增加对循证政策的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient Characteristics From Norway's First Heroin-Assisted Treatment Clinics. Using Planned and Unplanned Adaptation to Implement Universal Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention to Prevent Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancies in Four Primary Care Health Systems. Adverse Events at 1 Month Following Medication Initiation for Opioid Use Disorder Among Adolescents and Young Adults. National Addiction Workshop: A Virtual Adaptation to Support Competency Development in Opioid Use Disorder Management. Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and Cannabis by Sexual Identity, Race, Ethnicity, and Gender: A Nationwide Analysis Using the 2016 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1