World Heritage and human rights

Q1 Arts and Humanities Hunter Gatherer Research Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI:10.3828/hgr.2024.8
Margaret Gowen
{"title":"World Heritage and human rights","authors":"Margaret Gowen","doi":"10.3828/hgr.2024.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the protracted nomination to the UNESCO World Heritage (WH) List of the Keang Krachan Forest Complex, Thailand and the issues it exposed. The complex was inscribed in 2021, seven years after it was first nominated, despite ongoing conflict with indigenous Karen hunter-gatherer communities. The nomination was referred back to the state party by the WH Committee in 2015, 2016 and 2019 for reasons related to inconclusive and out-of-date ecological information, and human rights issues associated with the forced resettlement of Karen hill tribe people living within its proposed boundaries. In 2020 the nomination was resubmitted during the 4th mandate of the Thai state party on the WH Committee, and the property was inscribed contrary to a formal recommendation to defer the nomination, and despite repeated communications from the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights to the WH Centre, the Thai government and the WH Committee seeking resolution of community and human rights issues prior to inscription. Decisions that run contrary to the advice of the WH Committee’s three advisory bodies have become an abiding and troubling aspect of the Committee’s decision-making, reflecting a trend in the politicisation of Committee sessions that has increased over more than 20 years, to a point where it now threatens the integrity of the World Heritage system. This paper examines how the state party pursued its WH ambitions and the impacts this had on particular indigenous Karen communities during national designation and nomination to the WH List. It demonstrates the issues that arise due to legacy nature conservation approaches to the management of extensive natural protected areas.","PeriodicalId":36941,"journal":{"name":"Hunter Gatherer Research","volume":"20 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hunter Gatherer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2024.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the protracted nomination to the UNESCO World Heritage (WH) List of the Keang Krachan Forest Complex, Thailand and the issues it exposed. The complex was inscribed in 2021, seven years after it was first nominated, despite ongoing conflict with indigenous Karen hunter-gatherer communities. The nomination was referred back to the state party by the WH Committee in 2015, 2016 and 2019 for reasons related to inconclusive and out-of-date ecological information, and human rights issues associated with the forced resettlement of Karen hill tribe people living within its proposed boundaries. In 2020 the nomination was resubmitted during the 4th mandate of the Thai state party on the WH Committee, and the property was inscribed contrary to a formal recommendation to defer the nomination, and despite repeated communications from the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights to the WH Centre, the Thai government and the WH Committee seeking resolution of community and human rights issues prior to inscription. Decisions that run contrary to the advice of the WH Committee’s three advisory bodies have become an abiding and troubling aspect of the Committee’s decision-making, reflecting a trend in the politicisation of Committee sessions that has increased over more than 20 years, to a point where it now threatens the integrity of the World Heritage system. This paper examines how the state party pursued its WH ambitions and the impacts this had on particular indigenous Karen communities during national designation and nomination to the WH List. It demonstrates the issues that arise due to legacy nature conservation approaches to the management of extensive natural protected areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界遗产与人权
本文介绍了泰国 Keang Krachan 森林建筑群申报联合国教科文组织世界遗产(WH)的漫长过程及其暴露的问题。尽管该建筑群与克伦族土著狩猎-采集社区的冲突仍在持续,但在首次提名七年后,即 2021 年,该建筑群被列入《世界遗产名录》。2015 年、2016 年和 2019 年,世界遗产委员会将该提名退回缔约国,原因是生态信息不确定且过时,以及与居住在拟议边界内的克伦山地部落居民被迫重新定居有关的人权问题。2020 年,在世界遗产委员会泰国缔约国的第四个任期内,该提名被重新提交,尽管人权事务高级专员办事处多次与世界遗产中心、泰国政府和世界遗产委员会沟通,寻求在列入世界遗产之前解决社区和人权问题,但该遗产还是被列入了世界遗产名录,这与推迟提名的正式建议背道而驰。与世界遗产委员会三个咨询机构的意见相悖的决定已成为委员会决策过程中一个长期存在且令人担忧的问题,反映了委员会会议政治化的趋势,这种趋势在过去 20 多年中不断加剧,现已威胁到世界遗产体系的完整性。本文探讨了缔约国如何追求其世界遗产目标,以及在国家指定和世界遗产名录提名过程中对特定土著卡伦社区产生的影响。它说明了在管理广阔的自然保护区时,遗留下来的自然保护方法所产生的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hunter Gatherer Research
Hunter Gatherer Research Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anthropology underwater ‘Without my people, I am nothing’ An archaeology of animism Diversity and transition of stepfamilies among the G|ui and Gǁana Re-evaluating late Mesolithic economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1