Ultrasomics in liver cancer: Developing a radiomics model for differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) represent the predominant histological types of primary liver cancer, comprising over 99% of cases. Given their differing biological behaviors, prognoses, and treatment strategies, accurately differentiating between HCC and ICC is crucial for effective clinical management. Radiomics, an emerging image processing technology, can automatically extract various quantitative image features that may elude the human eye. Reports on the application of ultrasound (US)-based radiomics methods in distinguishing HCC from ICC are limited. AIM To develop and validate an ultrasomics model to accurately differentiate between HCC and ICC. METHODS In our retrospective study, we included a total of 280 patients who were diagnosed with ICC (n = 140) and HCC (n = 140) between 1999 and 2019. These patients were divided into training (n = 224) and testing (n = 56) groups for analysis. US images and relevant clinical characteristics were collected. We utilized the XGBoost method to extract and select radiomics features and further employed a random forest algorithm to establish ultrasomics models. We compared the diagnostic performances of these ultrasomics models with that of radiologists. RESULTS Four distinct ultrasomics models were constructed, with the number of selected features varying between models: 13 features for the US model; 15 for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) model; 13 for the combined US + CEUS model; and 21 for the US + CEUS + clinical data model. The US + CEUS + clinical data model yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among all models, achieving an AUC of 0.973 in the validation cohort and 0.971 in the test cohort. This performance exceeded even the most experienced radiologist (AUC = 0.964). The AUC for the US + CEUS model (training cohort AUC = 0.964, test cohort AUC = 0.955) was significantly higher than that of the US model alone (training cohort AUC = 0.822, test cohort AUC = 0.816). This finding underscored the significant benefit of incorporating CEUS information in accurately distinguishing ICC from HCC. CONCLUSION We developed a radiomics diagnostic model based on CEUS images capable of quickly distinguishing HCC from ICC, which outperformed experienced radiologists.