Green Analytical Approach for HPLC Method Development for Quantification of Sorafenib and Its Pharmacopeia Impurities: LC–MS/MS Characterization and Toxicity Prediction of Stress Degradation Products

IF 1.3 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1002/sscp.202400106
Rajesh Varma Bhupatiraju, Pavani Peddi, Subhashini . Edla, Kandula Rekha, Bikshal Babu Kasimala
{"title":"Green Analytical Approach for HPLC Method Development for Quantification of Sorafenib and Its Pharmacopeia Impurities: LC–MS/MS Characterization and Toxicity Prediction of Stress Degradation Products","authors":"Rajesh Varma Bhupatiraju, Pavani Peddi, Subhashini . Edla, Kandula Rekha, Bikshal Babu Kasimala","doi":"10.1002/sscp.202400106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents the development and validation of chromatographic method for analyzing sorafenib and its pharmacopeial impurities, with a focus on stability studies and degradation product (DP) characterization. Initial method optimization involved exploring various column and buffer combinations, ultimately achieving optimal separation and peak symmetry using an ODS‐AQ YMC (150 mm) column with 0.6 mL/min gradient flow of 10 mM ammonium formate buffer adjusted to pH 3.4 with formic acid as solvent A, and ethanol as solvent B as mobile phase and 246 nm wavelength. Method exhibits calibration curve linear in 50–300 µg/mL for sorafenib and 0.050–0.30 µg/mL for impurities with a detection limit of 0.015 µg/mL for impurities. A structural elucidation of DPs was performed using LC–MS/MS, providing valuable insights into their molecular compositions, and was characterized as 4‐[4‐(carboxyamino)phenoxy]pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid (DP 1) and 4‐(4‐aminophenoxy)pyridine‐2‐carboxamide (DP 2). Using AGREE and GAPI metrics, evaluation highlighted method sustainability through ethanol–water solvents and shorter column to reduce energy consumption. Toxicity assessments revealed differences in environmental impact and toxicological profiles of DPs, emphasizing importance of managing safety considerations for sorafenib and its DPs. This research offers novel insights into sorafenib analysis by addressing pharmacopeial impurities, characterizing DPs, and evaluating method sustainability and safety.","PeriodicalId":21639,"journal":{"name":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202400106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents the development and validation of chromatographic method for analyzing sorafenib and its pharmacopeial impurities, with a focus on stability studies and degradation product (DP) characterization. Initial method optimization involved exploring various column and buffer combinations, ultimately achieving optimal separation and peak symmetry using an ODS‐AQ YMC (150 mm) column with 0.6 mL/min gradient flow of 10 mM ammonium formate buffer adjusted to pH 3.4 with formic acid as solvent A, and ethanol as solvent B as mobile phase and 246 nm wavelength. Method exhibits calibration curve linear in 50–300 µg/mL for sorafenib and 0.050–0.30 µg/mL for impurities with a detection limit of 0.015 µg/mL for impurities. A structural elucidation of DPs was performed using LC–MS/MS, providing valuable insights into their molecular compositions, and was characterized as 4‐[4‐(carboxyamino)phenoxy]pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid (DP 1) and 4‐(4‐aminophenoxy)pyridine‐2‐carboxamide (DP 2). Using AGREE and GAPI metrics, evaluation highlighted method sustainability through ethanol–water solvents and shorter column to reduce energy consumption. Toxicity assessments revealed differences in environmental impact and toxicological profiles of DPs, emphasizing importance of managing safety considerations for sorafenib and its DPs. This research offers novel insights into sorafenib analysis by addressing pharmacopeial impurities, characterizing DPs, and evaluating method sustainability and safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于索拉非尼及其药典杂质定量的高效液相色谱法开发的绿色分析方法:应激降解产物的 LC-MS/MS 表征和毒性预测
本研究介绍了索拉非尼及其药典杂质的色谱分析方法的开发和验证,重点是稳定性研究和降解产物(DP)表征。最初的方法优化包括探索各种色谱柱和缓冲液组合,最终采用 ODS-AQ YMC(150 毫米)色谱柱,以 10 mM 甲酸铵缓冲液(pH 值调至 3.4)为流动相,甲酸为溶剂 A,乙醇为溶剂 B,流速为 0.6 mL/min,波长为 246 nm,实现了最佳分离和峰对称性。索拉非尼在 50-300 µg/mL 范围内线性关系良好,杂质在 0.050-0.30 µg/mL 范围内线性关系良好,杂质检测限为 0.015 µg/mL。利用 LC-MS/MS 对 DPs 进行了结构阐释,为了解其分子组成提供了宝贵的信息,其特征为 4-[4-(羧基氨基)苯氧基]吡啶-2-羧酸(DP 1)和 4-(4-氨基苯氧基)吡啶-2-甲酰胺(DP 2)。评估采用 AGREE 和 GAPI 指标,通过乙醇-水溶液和更短的色谱柱来降低能耗,突出了该方法的可持续性。毒性评估揭示了 DPs 在环境影响和毒理学特征方面的差异,强调了管理索拉非尼及其 DPs 的安全性考虑因素的重要性。这项研究通过解决药典杂质、表征DPs以及评估方法的可持续性和安全性,为索拉非尼分析提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Removal of Residual DNA and Host Cell Proteins for the Purification of Recombinant Staphylokinase Expressed in Escherichia coli Green Analytical Approach for HPLC Method Development for Quantification of Sorafenib and Its Pharmacopeia Impurities: LC–MS/MS Characterization and Toxicity Prediction of Stress Degradation Products A Cartridge Structure Facilitates Clinical Mass Spectrometry Pretreatment and Can be Integrated Into a High‐Throughput Instrument Comparison of Polysaccharide Profiles of Different Seaweeds Based on Ion Chromatography and Ultrahigh‐Performance Liquid Chromatography Quantification of Recycled Polypropylene Stabilizers for Quality Control by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Simple, Fast and Efficient Ultrasonic Extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1