Authenticity of academic lecture passages in high-stakes tests: A temporal fluency perspective

IF 2.2 1区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Testing Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1177/02655322241262453
Hitoshi Nishizawa
{"title":"Authenticity of academic lecture passages in high-stakes tests: A temporal fluency perspective","authors":"Hitoshi Nishizawa","doi":"10.1177/02655322241262453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corpus-based studies have offered the domain definition inference for test developers. Yet, corpus-based studies on temporal fluency measures (e.g., speech rate) have been limited, especially in the context of academic lecture settings. This made it difficult for test developers to sample representative fluency features to create authentic listening passages. To address this issue, the Fluency Corpus of Academic English Lectures (FCAEL) was created to offer insight into the thresholds for temporal fluency features in academic lecture settings. The current study compared the corpus data to the academic lecture passages in the Test of English as a Foreign Language Internet-based test (TOEFL iBT) and International English Language Testing System (IELTS) to examine the domain definition inference of these tests. In total, 14 temporal fluency measures were examined. A bootstrapped one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), followed by a series of bootstrapped analyses of variances (ANOVAs), independent t-test, and Tukey tests showed some support for the tests, although many limitations were also found. The study suggests the 25th–75th percentile of FCAEL as tentative thresholds for each temporal fluency feature. The proposal may be useful for test developers to create and revise test materials. Coding schemes, analysis codes, and raw corpus data are available on the project’s Open Science Framework page, exemplifying how Open Science can provide benefits beyond the academic community.","PeriodicalId":17928,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322241262453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corpus-based studies have offered the domain definition inference for test developers. Yet, corpus-based studies on temporal fluency measures (e.g., speech rate) have been limited, especially in the context of academic lecture settings. This made it difficult for test developers to sample representative fluency features to create authentic listening passages. To address this issue, the Fluency Corpus of Academic English Lectures (FCAEL) was created to offer insight into the thresholds for temporal fluency features in academic lecture settings. The current study compared the corpus data to the academic lecture passages in the Test of English as a Foreign Language Internet-based test (TOEFL iBT) and International English Language Testing System (IELTS) to examine the domain definition inference of these tests. In total, 14 temporal fluency measures were examined. A bootstrapped one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), followed by a series of bootstrapped analyses of variances (ANOVAs), independent t-test, and Tukey tests showed some support for the tests, although many limitations were also found. The study suggests the 25th–75th percentile of FCAEL as tentative thresholds for each temporal fluency feature. The proposal may be useful for test developers to create and revise test materials. Coding schemes, analysis codes, and raw corpus data are available on the project’s Open Science Framework page, exemplifying how Open Science can provide benefits beyond the academic community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高考中学术讲座段落的真实性:时间流畅性视角
基于语料库的研究为测试开发人员提供了领域定义推断。然而,基于语料库的时态流利度测量(如语速)研究一直很有限,尤其是在学术演讲环境中。这使得测试开发人员难以抽取具有代表性的流利度特征样本来创建真实的听力段落。为了解决这个问题,我们创建了学术英语讲座流利语料库(FCAEL),以便深入了解学术讲座环境中时间流利特征的阈值。本研究将语料库数据与基于互联网的英语作为外语考试(TOEFL iBT)和国际英语语言测试系统(IELTS)中的学术讲座段落进行比较,以检验这些测试的领域定义推断。共研究了 14 种时间流畅性测量方法。通过引导式单向多元方差分析(MANOVA)、一系列引导式方差分析(ANOVA)、独立 t 检验和 Tukey 检验,结果表明这些测试得到了一定的支持,但也发现了许多局限性。研究建议将 FCAEL 的第 25-75 百分位数作为每个时间流畅性特征的暂定阈值。该建议可能有助于测试开发人员创建和修订测试材料。编码方案、分析代码和原始语料库数据可在该项目的开放科学框架网页上查阅,这体现了开放科学如何能为学术界以外的人士带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing
Language Testing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Language Testing is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language testing and assessment. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between people working in the fields of first and second language testing and assessment. This includes researchers and practitioners in EFL and ESL testing, and assessment in child language acquisition and language pathology. In addition, special attention is focused on issues of testing theory, experimental investigations, and the following up of practical implications.
期刊最新文献
Can language test providers do more to support open science? A response to Winke Considerations to promote and accelerate Open Science: A response to Winke Evaluating the impact of nonverbal behavior on language ability ratings Sharing, collaborating, and building trust: How Open Science advances language testing Open Science in language assessment research contexts: A reply to Winke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1