Effect of branching middle responses in dichotomous scales on web surveys

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS International Journal of Market Research Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1177/14707853241268207
Z. T. Suzer-Gurtekin
{"title":"Effect of branching middle responses in dichotomous scales on web surveys","authors":"Z. T. Suzer-Gurtekin","doi":"10.1177/14707853241268207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research shows that in telephone surveys, 11–49% of respondents select a middle alternative when it is offered on dichotomous bipolar questions, although they do not volunteer a middle option when it is not mentioned. Furthermore, offering a middle option leads to different systematic response effects, including social desirability bias and satisficing effects, which are related to respondent characteristics. Research has shown that in telephone surveys, a question form with a branching middle response has a lower response validity compared to that of a non-branching middle response. However, compared to the non-branching form, the branching form could potentially motivate respondents to spend more time and effort in their responses in the absence of an interviewer. Therefore, validity and reliability differences between branching-question form responses and non-branching-question form responses in general population web surveys have become an area of interest for research. Using a randomized experiment, this study tests the impact of a branching middle alternative in a general population survey on the validity and reliability of responses. The branching middle alternative did not change the validity and reliability of responses, and compared to the alternative, it reduced satisficing behavior based on the proxies.","PeriodicalId":47641,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Market Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853241268207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research shows that in telephone surveys, 11–49% of respondents select a middle alternative when it is offered on dichotomous bipolar questions, although they do not volunteer a middle option when it is not mentioned. Furthermore, offering a middle option leads to different systematic response effects, including social desirability bias and satisficing effects, which are related to respondent characteristics. Research has shown that in telephone surveys, a question form with a branching middle response has a lower response validity compared to that of a non-branching middle response. However, compared to the non-branching form, the branching form could potentially motivate respondents to spend more time and effort in their responses in the absence of an interviewer. Therefore, validity and reliability differences between branching-question form responses and non-branching-question form responses in general population web surveys have become an area of interest for research. Using a randomized experiment, this study tests the impact of a branching middle alternative in a general population survey on the validity and reliability of responses. The branching middle alternative did not change the validity and reliability of responses, and compared to the alternative, it reduced satisficing behavior based on the proxies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络调查中二分法量表的分支中间反应的影响
以往的研究表明,在电话调查中,如果在二分法的两极问题中提供中间选项,11%-49% 的受访者会选择中间选项,但如果没有提到中间选项,受访者不会主动选择中间选项。此外,提供中间选项会导致不同的系统性回复效应,包括社会可取性偏差和满足效应,这与受访者的特征有关。研究表明,在电话调查中,与非分支中间回答相比,有分支中间回答的问题表单的回答有效性较低。然而,与非分支式表格相比,分支式表格有可能促使受访者在没有访问员的情况下花费更多的时间和精力进行回答。因此,在普通人群网络调查中,分支问题形式回答与非分支问题形式回答之间的有效性和可靠性差异已成为一个值得关注的研究领域。本研究通过随机试验,检验了在普通人群调查中采用分行中间替代方案对回答有效性和可靠性的影响。分支中间替代方案没有改变回答的有效性和可靠性,与替代方案相比,它减少了基于代理的满意行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Market Research is the essential professional aid for users and providers of market research. IJMR will help you to: KEEP abreast of cutting-edge developments APPLY new research approaches to your business UNDERSTAND new tools and techniques LEARN from the world’s leading research thinkers STAY at the forefront of your profession
期刊最新文献
Examining stated improvement research methods Marketing Outcomes and Shareholder Value: A Review and Research Agenda Measuring prime ministerial brands: Exploring Needham’s framework for assessing the UK’s Boris Johnson and the Greek konstantinos mitsotakis Machine learning based methods for ratemaking health care insurance When “the more the better”? Mindfulness enhances the effect of the number of displayed product features in short video ADs on purchase intention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1