Prediction of central deflection and slenderness limit for lateral stability of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques

Rashid Mustafa, Md Talib Ahmad, Akash Kumar, Sonu Kumar, Navin Kumar Sah, Abhishek Kumar
{"title":"Prediction of central deflection and slenderness limit for lateral stability of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques","authors":"Rashid Mustafa,&nbsp;Md Talib Ahmad,&nbsp;Akash Kumar,&nbsp;Sonu Kumar,&nbsp;Navin Kumar Sah,&nbsp;Abhishek Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01122-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the field of mechanics, large deflection of simply supported beam (SSB) carrying a load intensity (w) is well-known topic that has been thoroughly studied by many researchers. Numerous methods have been used, such as the analytical precise solution and the finite element approach. A small number of researchers computed central deflection of SSB having uniformly distributed load and also checked the slenderness limit for lateral stability (L<sub>s</sub>) of SSB using numerous machine learning (ML) techniques. This study compares the suitability and flexibility of the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR) and polynomial regression (PR) model in the reliability investigation of SSB. It also provides an ML-based prediction method for δ and checks the slenderness limit for L<sub>s</sub> of SSB. These three ML models apply to 400 datasets and predict the δ and as well as checks the slenderness limit for L<sub>s</sub> of SSB by taking account five major input parameters such as beam width (b), beam depth (h), beam length (L), uniformly distributed load (w) and characteristics compressive strength of concrete (f<sub>ck</sub>). Numerous performance indicators, including coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), variance account factor (VAF), a-20 index, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute deviation (MAD) are used to assess the efficacy of the well-established ML models. PR model achieved the best performance according to the performance metrics. This was attributed to its maximum R<sup>2</sup> = 0.999 and 1.000 and the lowest RMSE = 0.003 and 0 during the training phase, as well as R<sup>2</sup> = 0.994 and 1 and RMSE = 0.017 and 0 during the testing phase, while predicting central deflection (δ) and slenderness limit (Ls) of SSB respectively. The reliability index (β) was calculated using the first-order second moment (FOSM) method for all models. Rank analysis, reliability analysis, regression curve, William’s plot, Taylor diagram and error matrix plot are further tools used to assess the performance of the proposed model. First-order second moment (FOSM) approach is used to determine the reliability index (β) of the model and compared with the actual value. To check the influence of each input parameters, sensitivity analysis is performed for both the cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 7","pages":"5443 - 5466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01122-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of mechanics, large deflection of simply supported beam (SSB) carrying a load intensity (w) is well-known topic that has been thoroughly studied by many researchers. Numerous methods have been used, such as the analytical precise solution and the finite element approach. A small number of researchers computed central deflection of SSB having uniformly distributed load and also checked the slenderness limit for lateral stability (Ls) of SSB using numerous machine learning (ML) techniques. This study compares the suitability and flexibility of the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR) and polynomial regression (PR) model in the reliability investigation of SSB. It also provides an ML-based prediction method for δ and checks the slenderness limit for Ls of SSB. These three ML models apply to 400 datasets and predict the δ and as well as checks the slenderness limit for Ls of SSB by taking account five major input parameters such as beam width (b), beam depth (h), beam length (L), uniformly distributed load (w) and characteristics compressive strength of concrete (fck). Numerous performance indicators, including coefficient of determination (R2), variance account factor (VAF), a-20 index, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute deviation (MAD) are used to assess the efficacy of the well-established ML models. PR model achieved the best performance according to the performance metrics. This was attributed to its maximum R2 = 0.999 and 1.000 and the lowest RMSE = 0.003 and 0 during the training phase, as well as R2 = 0.994 and 1 and RMSE = 0.017 and 0 during the testing phase, while predicting central deflection (δ) and slenderness limit (Ls) of SSB respectively. The reliability index (β) was calculated using the first-order second moment (FOSM) method for all models. Rank analysis, reliability analysis, regression curve, William’s plot, Taylor diagram and error matrix plot are further tools used to assess the performance of the proposed model. First-order second moment (FOSM) approach is used to determine the reliability index (β) of the model and compared with the actual value. To check the influence of each input parameters, sensitivity analysis is performed for both the cases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习技术预测简支混凝土梁侧向稳定性的中心挠度和细长极限
在力学领域,承受载荷强度(w)的简支梁(SSB)的大挠度是一个众所周知的课题,许多研究人员对此进行了深入研究。研究中使用了许多方法,如分析精确解法和有限元方法。少数研究人员使用多种机器学习(ML)技术计算了具有均匀分布荷载的 SSB 的中心挠度,并检查了 SSB 横向稳定性的纤度极限(Ls)。本研究比较了极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、支持向量回归(SVR)和多项式回归(PR)模型在 SSB 可靠性研究中的适用性和灵活性。它还提供了一种基于 ML 的 δ 预测方法,并检验了 SSB Ls 的纤度极限。这三个 ML 模型适用于 400 个数据集,通过考虑五个主要输入参数,如梁宽(b)、梁深(h)、梁长(L)、均匀分布荷载(w)和混凝土抗压强度特征值(fck),预测 SSB 的 δ 值,并检验 Ls 的纤度极限。采用了许多性能指标,包括判定系数 (R2)、方差系数 (VAF)、a-20 指数、均方根误差 (RMSE)、平均绝对误差 (MAE) 和平均绝对偏差 (MAD),以评估成熟的 ML 模型的有效性。根据性能指标,PR 模型的性能最佳。这归功于其在训练阶段的最大 R2 = 0.999 和 1.000,最低 RMSE = 0.003 和 0,以及在测试阶段的 R2 = 0.994 和 1,RMSE = 0.017 和 0,分别预测了 SSB 的中心挠度(δ)和纤度极限(Ls)。所有模型的可靠性指数(β)都是用一阶二矩法(FOSM)计算得出的。秩分析、可靠性分析、回归曲线、威廉图、泰勒图和误差矩阵图是评估所提模型性能的进一步工具。一阶第二矩(FOSM)法用于确定模型的可靠性指数(β),并与实际值进行比较。为检查各输入参数的影响,对两种情况都进行了敏感性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
期刊最新文献
Towards energy-efficient and comfortable housing in Jordan: a machine learning approach to predicting thermal comfort Experimental and theoretical investigation for improving torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams with hybrid fibers Comprehensive assessment of non-destructive techniques for sequester-based carbon mortar under acidic exposure conditions and predicted using an artificial neural network Harnessing machine learning algorithms for benchmarking deterioration prediction in civil infrastructure systems Modified adaptive weight multi-objective mountain gazelle optimizer for construction time-cost trade-off optimization problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1