Manipulating the masses? Right-wing populist messages, political ideology, and public support for multilateral development aid in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom

IF 1.7 4区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of International Development Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1002/jid.3927
A. Burcu Bayram, Sebastian H. Schneider, Jörg Faust, Catarina Thomson
{"title":"Manipulating the masses? Right-wing populist messages, political ideology, and public support for multilateral development aid in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom","authors":"A. Burcu Bayram,&nbsp;Sebastian H. Schneider,&nbsp;Jörg Faust,&nbsp;Catarina Thomson","doi":"10.1002/jid.3927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How does right-wing populism affect public preferences for foreign development aid spending across the liberal/conservative ideological spectrum? This research examines the complex interplay between exposure to right-wing populist messages targeting aid and political ideology at the mass level in Germany, the United States (U.S.), and the United Kingdom (UK) with data from original survey experiments. First, the experiments indicate that populist rhetoric reduces public support for foreign aid across all countries albeit to varying degrees. Second, the moderating role of political ideology is variable and complex across the different countries. In Germany, populist anti-aid messages reduce support among voters on the center of the ideological spectrum and among those without clear ideological preferences. In the U.S., anti-aid messages affect those on the left. In the UK, the effect of populist anti-aid rhetoric surprisingly does not vary cross ideological groups. Our results have implications for the prospects of public support for development cooperation in the shadow of populism.</p>","PeriodicalId":47986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Development","volume":"36 7","pages":"2705-2724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jid.3927","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.3927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does right-wing populism affect public preferences for foreign development aid spending across the liberal/conservative ideological spectrum? This research examines the complex interplay between exposure to right-wing populist messages targeting aid and political ideology at the mass level in Germany, the United States (U.S.), and the United Kingdom (UK) with data from original survey experiments. First, the experiments indicate that populist rhetoric reduces public support for foreign aid across all countries albeit to varying degrees. Second, the moderating role of political ideology is variable and complex across the different countries. In Germany, populist anti-aid messages reduce support among voters on the center of the ideological spectrum and among those without clear ideological preferences. In the U.S., anti-aid messages affect those on the left. In the UK, the effect of populist anti-aid rhetoric surprisingly does not vary cross ideological groups. Our results have implications for the prospects of public support for development cooperation in the shadow of populism.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
操纵群众?德国、美国和英国的右翼民粹主义信息、政治意识形态以及对多边发展援助的公众支持
右翼民粹主义如何影响自由派/保守派意识形态光谱中公众对对外发展援助支出的偏好?本研究利用原始调查实验的数据,研究了德国、美国和英国在大众层面上接触针对援助的右翼民粹主义信息与政治意识形态之间复杂的相互作用。首先,实验表明民粹主义言论会在不同程度上减少所有国家公众对外援的支持。其次,政治意识形态的调节作用在不同国家是多变和复杂的。在德国,民粹主义反援助言论降低了意识形态光谱中心选民和无明确意识形态偏好选民的支持率。在美国,反援助信息会影响左翼选民。在英国,民粹主义反援助言论的影响竟然不因意识形态群体而异。我们的研究结果对民粹主义阴影下公众支持发展合作的前景产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to publish the best research on international development issues in a form that is accessible to practitioners and policy-makers as well as to an academic audience. The main focus is on the social sciences - economics, politics, international relations, sociology and anthropology, as well as development studies - but we also welcome articles that blend the natural and social sciences in addressing the challenges for development. The Journal does not represent any particular school, analytical technique or methodological approach, but aims to publish high quality contributions to ideas, frameworks, policy and practice, including in transitional countries and underdeveloped areas of the Global North as well as the Global South.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Are autocratic donors impeding democracy abroad? The presence of autocratic donors and citizens' perceptions of democracy Issue Information Gender of a manager and firm performance in Africa: Does the business environment play a moderating role? Striking a balance between water use and environmental protection in an oasis—A case study of Ganzhou District, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1