Comparative analysis of antibiotics: Inhibition of protein synthesis versus DNA synthesis

Xiaoci Wang, Daini Liu, Yachun Li, Duohan Zhang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of antibiotics: Inhibition of protein synthesis versus DNA synthesis","authors":"Xiaoci Wang, Daini Liu, Yachun Li, Duohan Zhang","doi":"10.54254/2753-8818/44/20240493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this piece of writing, we will be addressing the following factors: properties of antibiotics, mechanism of action, clinical safety profile, as well as toxicity, adverse event profile, and case fatality rate. From our evaluation, in terms of properties of the two groups of antibiotics, protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics displays a like number of lipophilic and hydrophilic properties, with the majority of Anti-30S inhibitor drugs being predominantly hydrophilic, and a higher number of lipophilic drugs amongst Anti-50S inhibitors. Anti-50S inhibitors could therefore be preferred in oral intake drug development. DNA synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics show a limited trend in their properties. The mechanism of action for protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics generally follows four steps: activation of amino acids, initiation, extension, and termination of peptide chain synthesis. On the other hand, DNA synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics exhibits a range of different mechanisms, all of which results in the damage of DNA structure of the bacterium. In both clinical safety and toxicity studies, it is concluded that the two groups of antibiotics have previous cases of side effects, with the DNA synthesis-inhibiting drug, fluoroquinolones, more dangerous due to its potential to result in ventricular fibrillation on a patient. By assessing and comparing all the factors, this review aims to present a precise comparison of the similarities and differences between the protein and DNA synthesis inhibitors, and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the two groups against bacterial infections, along with their safety for regular medication use.","PeriodicalId":341023,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Natural Science","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Natural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/44/20240493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this piece of writing, we will be addressing the following factors: properties of antibiotics, mechanism of action, clinical safety profile, as well as toxicity, adverse event profile, and case fatality rate. From our evaluation, in terms of properties of the two groups of antibiotics, protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics displays a like number of lipophilic and hydrophilic properties, with the majority of Anti-30S inhibitor drugs being predominantly hydrophilic, and a higher number of lipophilic drugs amongst Anti-50S inhibitors. Anti-50S inhibitors could therefore be preferred in oral intake drug development. DNA synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics show a limited trend in their properties. The mechanism of action for protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics generally follows four steps: activation of amino acids, initiation, extension, and termination of peptide chain synthesis. On the other hand, DNA synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics exhibits a range of different mechanisms, all of which results in the damage of DNA structure of the bacterium. In both clinical safety and toxicity studies, it is concluded that the two groups of antibiotics have previous cases of side effects, with the DNA synthesis-inhibiting drug, fluoroquinolones, more dangerous due to its potential to result in ventricular fibrillation on a patient. By assessing and comparing all the factors, this review aims to present a precise comparison of the similarities and differences between the protein and DNA synthesis inhibitors, and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the two groups against bacterial infections, along with their safety for regular medication use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素的比较分析:抑制蛋白质合成与抑制 DNA 合成
在本文中,我们将讨论以下因素:抗生素的特性、作用机制、临床安全性概况,以及毒性、不良事件概况和病死率。根据我们的评估,从两类抗生素的特性来看,蛋白合成抑制抗生素的亲脂性和亲水性相似,大多数抗 30S 抑制剂药物以亲水性为主,而抗 50S 抑制剂中亲脂性药物较多。因此,在口服药物开发中,抗 50S 抑制剂可能是首选。DNA 合成抑制抗生素的特性趋势有限。抑制蛋白质合成的抗生素的作用机制一般遵循四个步骤:激活氨基酸、启动、延长和终止肽链合成。另一方面,DNA 合成抑制型抗生素表现出一系列不同的机制,所有这些机制都会导致细菌 DNA 结构的破坏。在临床安全性和毒性研究中,这两类抗生素都曾出现过副作用,其中抑制 DNA 合成的药物氟喹诺酮类更危险,因为它有可能导致患者心室颤动。通过评估和比较所有因素,本综述旨在精确比较蛋白质合成抑制剂和 DNA 合成抑制剂之间的异同,评估这两类药物对细菌感染的有效性,以及常规用药的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Restoring the acidifying function of lysosomes for Alzheimer's disease therapy MRI phenotype mediates the association between APOE4 and AD: A cross-sectional study A momentum quantification method for tennis matches based on t-SNE and k means clustering Practical quantitative research on technological impact on Australia post facilities' processing capacity The comparison of sodium sulfacetamide and erythromycin in treating trachoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1