Ventricular volume asymmetry as a novel imaging biomarker for disease discrimination and outcome prediction

Celeste McCracken, Liliana Szabo, Z. A. Abdulelah, Dorina Condurache, H. Vago, T. Nichols, Steffen E Petersen, S. Neubauer, Z. Raisi-Estabragh
{"title":"Ventricular volume asymmetry as a novel imaging biomarker for disease discrimination and outcome prediction","authors":"Celeste McCracken, Liliana Szabo, Z. A. Abdulelah, Dorina Condurache, H. Vago, T. Nichols, Steffen E Petersen, S. Neubauer, Z. Raisi-Estabragh","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Disruption of the predictable symmetry of the healthy heart may be an indicator of cardiovascular risk. This study defines the population distribution of ventricular asymmetry and its relationships across a range of prevalent and incident cardiorespiratory diseases.\n \n \n \n The analysis includes 44,796 UK Biobank participants (average age 64.1±7.7 years; 51.9% women). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) metrics were derived using previously validated automated pipelines. Ventricular asymmetry was expressed as the ratio of left and right ventricular (LV, RV) end-diastolic volumes. Clinical outcomes were defined through linked health records. Incident events were those occurring for the first time after imaging, longitudinally tracked over an average follow-up time of 4.75 ± 1.52 years. The normal range for ventricular symmetry was defined in a healthy subset. Participants with values outside the 5th-95th percentiles of the healthy distribution were classed as either LV dominant (LV/RV > 112%) or RV dominant (LV/RV < 80%) asymmetry. Associations of LV and RV dominant asymmetry with vascular risk factors, CMR features, and prevalent and incident cardiovascular diseases were examined using regression models, adjusting for vascular risk factors, prevalent diseases, and conventional CMR measures. LV-dominance was linked to an array of pre-existing vascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases, and a two-fold increased risk of incident heart failure, non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, and left-sided valvular disorders. RV dominance was associated with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality.\n \n \n \n Ventricular asymmetry has clinical utility for cardiovascular risk assessment, providing information that is incremental to traditional risk factors and conventional CMR metrics.\n","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disruption of the predictable symmetry of the healthy heart may be an indicator of cardiovascular risk. This study defines the population distribution of ventricular asymmetry and its relationships across a range of prevalent and incident cardiorespiratory diseases. The analysis includes 44,796 UK Biobank participants (average age 64.1±7.7 years; 51.9% women). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) metrics were derived using previously validated automated pipelines. Ventricular asymmetry was expressed as the ratio of left and right ventricular (LV, RV) end-diastolic volumes. Clinical outcomes were defined through linked health records. Incident events were those occurring for the first time after imaging, longitudinally tracked over an average follow-up time of 4.75 ± 1.52 years. The normal range for ventricular symmetry was defined in a healthy subset. Participants with values outside the 5th-95th percentiles of the healthy distribution were classed as either LV dominant (LV/RV > 112%) or RV dominant (LV/RV < 80%) asymmetry. Associations of LV and RV dominant asymmetry with vascular risk factors, CMR features, and prevalent and incident cardiovascular diseases were examined using regression models, adjusting for vascular risk factors, prevalent diseases, and conventional CMR measures. LV-dominance was linked to an array of pre-existing vascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases, and a two-fold increased risk of incident heart failure, non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, and left-sided valvular disorders. RV dominance was associated with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality. Ventricular asymmetry has clinical utility for cardiovascular risk assessment, providing information that is incremental to traditional risk factors and conventional CMR metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心室容积不对称是一种新型成像生物标记,可用于疾病鉴别和结果预测
健康心脏可预测的对称性被破坏可能是心血管风险的一个指标。这项研究确定了心室不对称的人群分布及其与一系列心肺疾病的流行和发病的关系。 分析对象包括 44,796 名英国生物库参与者(平均年龄为 64.1±7.7 岁;51.9% 为女性)。心血管磁共振(CMR)指标是通过先前验证的自动管道得出的。心室不对称表示为左心室和右心室(LV、RV)舒张末期容积之比。临床结果通过关联的健康记录进行定义。事件指成像后首次发生的事件,平均随访时间为 4.75 ± 1.52 年。心室对称性的正常范围是在一个健康的子集中定义的。如果参与者的数值超出健康分布的第5-95百分位数,则被归类为左心室占优势(LV/RV>112%)或右心室占优势(LV/RV<80%)不对称。使用回归模型研究了左心室和右心室显性不对称与血管风险因素、CMR特征、心血管疾病流行和发病的关系,并对血管风险因素、疾病流行和常规CMR测量进行了调整。左心室优势与一系列预先存在的血管风险因素和心血管疾病有关,而且发生心力衰竭、非缺血性心肌病和左侧瓣膜疾病的风险增加了两倍。RV 优势与全因死亡风险升高有关。 心室不对称在心血管风险评估中具有临床实用性,它提供的信息是传统风险因素和常规 CMR 指标的增量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The acute effect of high-dose supplemental oxygen on haemodynamics assessed by echocardiography in patients with pulmonary vascular disease living in Quito at 2850 m: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Percutaneous thrombectomy with the FlowTriever for pulmonary embolism with right heart thrombi: a retrospective two centres study. Single high-sensitivity troponin-I for ruling out acute coronary syndrome: a detection limit approach. Beyond the heart: multisystem complications fuelling cardiac dysfunction in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1