A Systematic Review of Postgraduate Programmes Concerning Ethical Imperatives of Data Privacy in Sustainable Educational Data Analytics

Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.3390/su16156377
M. Ncube, P. Ngulube
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Postgraduate Programmes Concerning Ethical Imperatives of Data Privacy in Sustainable Educational Data Analytics","authors":"M. Ncube, P. Ngulube","doi":"10.3390/su16156377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, investigated the intersection of data privacy, postgraduate educational data analytics (EDA), and sustainability. Existing literature focuses on general privacy concerns in EDA, neglecting the specific data collected and related risks in postgraduate programmes. This review addresses this gap by identifying data types used by higher education institutions in postgraduate initiatives and evaluating the adequacy of current ethical frameworks, particularly for sustainability goals. Recognising the lack of established best practices for balancing data utility and privacy, the review analyses privacy-preserving techniques. Through identifying key data types collected in postgraduate initiatives, evaluating existing ethical frameworks, and exploring privacy-preserving educational data analytics techniques, this study provided practical guidance for higher education institutions to navigate the challenges of balancing data utility and student privacy. The results suggest that higher education institutions can achieve sustainable data use by adopting a comprehensive approach that incorporates best practices, emerging technologies, and continuous monitoring to safeguard student privacy while leveraging the benefits of educational data analytics for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.","PeriodicalId":509360,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, investigated the intersection of data privacy, postgraduate educational data analytics (EDA), and sustainability. Existing literature focuses on general privacy concerns in EDA, neglecting the specific data collected and related risks in postgraduate programmes. This review addresses this gap by identifying data types used by higher education institutions in postgraduate initiatives and evaluating the adequacy of current ethical frameworks, particularly for sustainability goals. Recognising the lack of established best practices for balancing data utility and privacy, the review analyses privacy-preserving techniques. Through identifying key data types collected in postgraduate initiatives, evaluating existing ethical frameworks, and exploring privacy-preserving educational data analytics techniques, this study provided practical guidance for higher education institutions to navigate the challenges of balancing data utility and student privacy. The results suggest that higher education institutions can achieve sustainable data use by adopting a comprehensive approach that incorporates best practices, emerging technologies, and continuous monitoring to safeguard student privacy while leveraging the benefits of educational data analytics for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于可持续教育数据分析中数据隐私伦理要求的研究生课程的系统回顾
本系统综述遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,调查了数据隐私、研究生教育数据分析(EDA)和可持续性之间的交叉点。现有文献主要关注 EDA 中的一般隐私问题,忽略了研究生课程中收集的特定数据和相关风险。本综述通过确定高等教育机构在研究生项目中使用的数据类型,评估当前伦理框架的适当性,特别是对可持续发展目标的适当性,来弥补这一不足。由于缺乏平衡数据效用与隐私的既定最佳实践,本综述分析了隐私保护技术。本研究通过确定在研究生计划中收集的关键数据类型、评估现有伦理框架以及探索保护隐私的教育数据分析技术,为高等教育机构应对平衡数据效用和学生隐私的挑战提供了实用指导。研究结果表明,高等教育机构可以通过采用综合方法,结合最佳实践、新兴技术和持续监测,实现数据的可持续使用,以保护学生隐私,同时利用教育数据分析的优势实现可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Drivers of Carbon Storage from a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Case Study of the Region along the Middle and Lower Yellow River, China Digital Inclusive Finance, Digital Technology Innovation, and Carbon Emission Intensity Sustainability in Leadership: The Implicit Associations of the First-Person Pronouns and Leadership Effectiveness Based on Word Embedding Association Test Towards a Taxonomy of E-Waste Urban Mining Technology Design and Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review Charting Pollution Effects on Tourism: A Regional Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1