Effect of Incorporating Cement and Olive Waste Ash on the Mechanical Properties of Rammed Earth Block

IF 2.7 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Infrastructures Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.3390/infrastructures9080122
H. Ghanem, Chouk El Bouz, R. Ramadan, Adrien Trad, Jamal M. Khatib, A. Elkordi
{"title":"Effect of Incorporating Cement and Olive Waste Ash on the Mechanical Properties of Rammed Earth Block","authors":"H. Ghanem, Chouk El Bouz, R. Ramadan, Adrien Trad, Jamal M. Khatib, A. Elkordi","doi":"10.3390/infrastructures9080122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rammed earth blocks have recently gained substantial popularity in construction materials due to their environmental benefits, energy saving, and financial effectiveness. These benefits are even more pronounced if waste materials such as olive waste ash (OWA) are incorporated in rammed earth blocks. There is limited information on the use of OWA in rammed earth blocks. This paper investigates the use of OWA and cement in improving rammed earth block characteristics. OWA was incorporated to partially replace the soil by 10, 20, 30 and 40% of its weight and cement was added in percentages of 2, 4, 6 and 8% by the dry weight of the composite soil. Proctor, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were performed at 7, 28, and 56 days. Results indicated that OWA inclusion decreased the maximum dry density while it increased the optimum moisture content. However, cement addition improved the maximum dry density of soil. The UCS results revealed that OWA possessed cementitious and pozzolanic behavior, and soil mechanical properties improved by up to 30% due to OWA inclusion, after which there was a significant drop of 40%. The trend in the CBR results was similar to those of UCS. To further clarify the experimental results, a mathematical model was proposed to determine the variation in strength as a function of time. Furthermore, correlations between soil mechanical properties were conducted. Predicted equations were developed to determine the properties of rammed earth block. All in all, the inclusion of OWA in cement stabilized earth block suggests the potential to improve the properties of rammed earth blocks.","PeriodicalId":13601,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9080122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rammed earth blocks have recently gained substantial popularity in construction materials due to their environmental benefits, energy saving, and financial effectiveness. These benefits are even more pronounced if waste materials such as olive waste ash (OWA) are incorporated in rammed earth blocks. There is limited information on the use of OWA in rammed earth blocks. This paper investigates the use of OWA and cement in improving rammed earth block characteristics. OWA was incorporated to partially replace the soil by 10, 20, 30 and 40% of its weight and cement was added in percentages of 2, 4, 6 and 8% by the dry weight of the composite soil. Proctor, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were performed at 7, 28, and 56 days. Results indicated that OWA inclusion decreased the maximum dry density while it increased the optimum moisture content. However, cement addition improved the maximum dry density of soil. The UCS results revealed that OWA possessed cementitious and pozzolanic behavior, and soil mechanical properties improved by up to 30% due to OWA inclusion, after which there was a significant drop of 40%. The trend in the CBR results was similar to those of UCS. To further clarify the experimental results, a mathematical model was proposed to determine the variation in strength as a function of time. Furthermore, correlations between soil mechanical properties were conducted. Predicted equations were developed to determine the properties of rammed earth block. All in all, the inclusion of OWA in cement stabilized earth block suggests the potential to improve the properties of rammed earth blocks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掺入水泥和橄榄废灰对夯实土块力学性能的影响
夯土砌块因其环保、节能和经济效益,最近在建筑材料中大受欢迎。如果在夯土砌块中加入橄榄废灰(OWA)等废料,这些优势会更加明显。有关在夯土砌块中使用 OWA 的信息非常有限。本文研究了如何使用 OWA 和水泥来改善夯土砌块的特性。添加的 OWA 部分取代了土壤,占其重量的 10%、20%、30% 和 40%,水泥的添加比例为复合土壤干重的 2%、4%、6% 和 8%。在 7 天、28 天和 56 天时分别进行了 Proctor、无侧限抗压强度(UCS)和加州承载比(CBR)测试。结果表明,加入 OWA 会降低最大干密度,同时增加最佳含水量。然而,水泥的加入提高了土壤的最大干密度。UCS 结果表明,OWA 具有胶凝和水青作用,加入 OWA 后,土壤机械性能最多可提高 30%,之后则显著下降了 40%。CBR 结果的趋势与 UCS 相似。为了进一步阐明实验结果,我们提出了一个数学模型来确定强度随时间的变化。此外,还进行了土壤机械性能之间的相关性分析。通过建立预测方程,确定了夯实土块的特性。总而言之,在水泥稳定土块中加入 OWA 表明有可能改善夯实土块的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infrastructures
Infrastructures Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Study on Unsupervised Transfer Learning for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges Using Joint Distribution Adaptation Improving Lightweight Structural Tuff Concrete Composition Using Three-Factor Experimental Planning Buckling Instability of Monopiles in Liquefied Soil via Structural Reliability Assessment Framework Effect of Incorporating Cement and Olive Waste Ash on the Mechanical Properties of Rammed Earth Block Integrating Machine Learning in Geotechnical Engineering: A Novel Approach for Railway Track Layer Design Based on Cone Penetration Test Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1