Seismic performance of high-rise buildings with advanced lateral load resisting systems subjected to wind and earthquake loads

Emmanuel Joseph Sulonteh, Ankit Mahajan
{"title":"Seismic performance of high-rise buildings with advanced lateral load resisting systems subjected to wind and earthquake loads","authors":"Emmanuel Joseph Sulonteh,&nbsp;Ankit Mahajan","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01118-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-rise buildings must withstand environmental forces such as wind and earthquakes to ensure occupant safety and structural stability. This research investigates the seismic performance of eight (G + 20) building models with different lateral load-resisting systems: a normal building (MD1), a core wall (MD2), a V-bracing frame (MD3), an inverted V-bracing frame (MD4), an X-bracing frame (MD5), an outer shear wall (MD6), an inner shear wall (MD7), and a concrete diagrid system (MD8). The study examines the seismic performance of these models using response spectrum and pushover analyses, focusing on the natural time, story displacement, base shear, story drift, overturning moment, performance point, and location of plastic hinges. ETABS. (2021). <i>Structural and Earthquakes Engineering Software</i>,<i> Computers &amp; Structures Inc. (Vision</i>,<i> 21.2.0)</i>. Berkeley University, California, USA.) software and Indian standard codes were used for structural analysis. The results revealed that the natural period ranges from 2.147 s in MD1 to 1.599 s in MD7, representing 25.5% difference in stiffness. MD6, which is slightly less stiff than MD7, is preferred for cost savings. MD3 has the highest base shear (6406.6 kN), while MD6 has the lowest base shear (4718.4 kN), representing 26.3% stiffness variation. Compared with MD1, the story displacement of MD6 is 40.0% less because of practical outer shear wall elements. All models met the IS 1893 Part 1: 2016 (Indian Standard, criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures - Part 1: General provisions and buildings, 2017) criteria for permissible story drift. Compared with MD1, MD8 reduces the story drift by 66.2% and has the lowest overturning moment, which is 85.2% less than that of MD2. Pushover analysis revealed that all the models met the safety criteria, although MD5 had a hinge exceeding the E-state, and MD8 had some hinges in the LS-CP and C-D states. Despite these issues, MD5 and MD8 maintain strength in vital load-bearing elements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 7","pages":"5377 - 5391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01118-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-rise buildings must withstand environmental forces such as wind and earthquakes to ensure occupant safety and structural stability. This research investigates the seismic performance of eight (G + 20) building models with different lateral load-resisting systems: a normal building (MD1), a core wall (MD2), a V-bracing frame (MD3), an inverted V-bracing frame (MD4), an X-bracing frame (MD5), an outer shear wall (MD6), an inner shear wall (MD7), and a concrete diagrid system (MD8). The study examines the seismic performance of these models using response spectrum and pushover analyses, focusing on the natural time, story displacement, base shear, story drift, overturning moment, performance point, and location of plastic hinges. ETABS. (2021). Structural and Earthquakes Engineering Software, Computers & Structures Inc. (Vision, 21.2.0). Berkeley University, California, USA.) software and Indian standard codes were used for structural analysis. The results revealed that the natural period ranges from 2.147 s in MD1 to 1.599 s in MD7, representing 25.5% difference in stiffness. MD6, which is slightly less stiff than MD7, is preferred for cost savings. MD3 has the highest base shear (6406.6 kN), while MD6 has the lowest base shear (4718.4 kN), representing 26.3% stiffness variation. Compared with MD1, the story displacement of MD6 is 40.0% less because of practical outer shear wall elements. All models met the IS 1893 Part 1: 2016 (Indian Standard, criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures - Part 1: General provisions and buildings, 2017) criteria for permissible story drift. Compared with MD1, MD8 reduces the story drift by 66.2% and has the lowest overturning moment, which is 85.2% less than that of MD2. Pushover analysis revealed that all the models met the safety criteria, although MD5 had a hinge exceeding the E-state, and MD8 had some hinges in the LS-CP and C-D states. Despite these issues, MD5 and MD8 maintain strength in vital load-bearing elements.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用先进抗侧荷载系统的高层建筑在风荷载和地震荷载作用下的抗震性能
高层建筑必须抵御风和地震等环境力,以确保居住安全和结构稳定。本研究调查了具有不同侧向荷载抵抗系统的八个(G + 20)建筑模型的抗震性能:普通建筑(MD1)、核心墙(MD2)、V 型支撑框架(MD3)、倒 V 型支撑框架(MD4)、X 型支撑框架(MD5)、外剪力墙(MD6)、内剪力墙(MD7)和混凝土斜网系统(MD8)。该研究使用反应谱和推移分析来检验这些模型的抗震性能,重点关注自然时间、楼层位移、基底剪力、楼层漂移、倾覆力矩、性能点和塑性铰链的位置。ETABS.(2021).结构与地震工程软件,Computers & Structures 公司(Vision,21.2.0)。美国加利福尼亚州伯克利大学)软件和印度标准规范用于结构分析。结果显示,MD1 的自然周期为 2.147 秒,MD7 为 1.599 秒,刚度相差 25.5%。MD6 的刚度略低于 MD7,是节约成本的首选。MD3 的基底剪力最大(6406.6 千牛),而 MD6 的基底剪力最小(4718.4 千牛),刚度差异为 26.3%。与 MD1 相比,由于采用了实用的外剪力墙构件,MD6 的层间位移减少了 40.0%。所有模型均符合 IS 1893 Part 1: 2016(印度标准,结构抗震设计标准 - 第 1 部分:一般规定和建筑物,2017 年)的标准。与 MD1 相比,MD8 的楼层漂移减少了 66.2%,倾覆力矩最小,比 MD2 减少了 85.2%。推力分析表明,所有模型都符合安全标准,但 MD5 有一个铰链超过了 E 状态,MD8 有一些铰链处于 LS-CP 和 C-D 状态。尽管存在这些问题,MD5 和 MD8 仍然保持了重要承重构件的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
期刊最新文献
AI-augmented multi-objective structural optimization and statistical evaluation of flat slab systems with and without shear walls in high-rise RCC buildings under seismic loads Optimization of Voronoi tessellation with diagrid & hexagrid using MATLAB A user-centric machine learning framework for predicting multi-modal accessibility in transit-oriented development zones for sustainable urban construction in tier-2 Indian cities Correction: An opposition-enhanced Rao-2 metaheuristic for integrated time–cost–quality–safety optimization Machine-learning-driven modeling of strength in high-performance graphene oxide induced nano-concrete composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1