The Importance of Green Investments in Developed Economies—MCDM Models for Achieving Adequate Green Investments

Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.3390/su16156341
V. Ristanović, D. Primorac, B. Dorić
{"title":"The Importance of Green Investments in Developed Economies—MCDM Models for Achieving Adequate Green Investments","authors":"V. Ristanović, D. Primorac, B. Dorić","doi":"10.3390/su16156341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Green investments help to create less harmful alternatives and adequate funds that contribute to economic growth, sustainable development, and social well-being. The paper aims to evaluate decision making on the choice of green investments based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). The applied methods are empirical and analytical based on the study of the literature, multi-criteria modeling, the determination of weights, and the ranking of criteria in deciding the green investment mapping of indicators, and mapping the indicators. The research used groups of indicators that reflect the main characteristics of green growth from the OECD database. The idea is to decide on the best green investment based on green growth criteria, which consist of grouped indicators according to the areas of the green economy rather than according to their values. The results of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP method) showed that half of the investments in the green economy come from public sources (0.51) and the other half are private (0.25) and institutional investors (0.24), while the Best/Worst Method (BWM) revealed that the best criterion for the decision to invest in the green economy is the environmental and resource productivity of the economy, and the worst is the base of natural assets. This paper aims to enable decision-makers to use these results as weights for the overall assessment of green investments in ESG and to simplify the decision-making approach in future analyses.","PeriodicalId":509360,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability","volume":"36 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green investments help to create less harmful alternatives and adequate funds that contribute to economic growth, sustainable development, and social well-being. The paper aims to evaluate decision making on the choice of green investments based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). The applied methods are empirical and analytical based on the study of the literature, multi-criteria modeling, the determination of weights, and the ranking of criteria in deciding the green investment mapping of indicators, and mapping the indicators. The research used groups of indicators that reflect the main characteristics of green growth from the OECD database. The idea is to decide on the best green investment based on green growth criteria, which consist of grouped indicators according to the areas of the green economy rather than according to their values. The results of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP method) showed that half of the investments in the green economy come from public sources (0.51) and the other half are private (0.25) and institutional investors (0.24), while the Best/Worst Method (BWM) revealed that the best criterion for the decision to invest in the green economy is the environmental and resource productivity of the economy, and the worst is the base of natural assets. This paper aims to enable decision-makers to use these results as weights for the overall assessment of green investments in ESG and to simplify the decision-making approach in future analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发达经济体进行绿色投资的重要性--实现充足绿色投资的成本与机会管理(MCDM)模型
绿色投资有助于创造危害较小的替代品和充足的资金,从而促进经济增长、可持续发展和社会福祉。本文旨在基于多标准决策(MCDM)对选择绿色投资的决策进行评估。所采用的方法是基于文献研究、多标准建模、权重确定和标准排序的实证和分析方法,以决定绿色投资的指标映射和指标映射。研究使用了经合组织数据库中反映绿色增长主要特征的指标组。这样做的目的是根据绿色增长标准来决定最佳绿色投资,而绿色增长标准是根据绿色经济的领域而不是根据其价值对指标进行分组。层次分析法(AHP 法)的结果显示,绿色经济投资的一半来自公共资源(0.51),另一半来自私人(0.25)和机构投资者(0.24),而最佳/最差法(BWM)显示,决定投资绿色经济的最佳标准是经济的环境和资源生产力,最差的是自然资产基础。本文旨在使决策者能够利用这些结果作为权重,对环境、社会和公司治理方面的绿色投资进行总体评估,并在今后的分析中简化决策方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Drivers of Carbon Storage from a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Case Study of the Region along the Middle and Lower Yellow River, China Digital Inclusive Finance, Digital Technology Innovation, and Carbon Emission Intensity Sustainability in Leadership: The Implicit Associations of the First-Person Pronouns and Leadership Effectiveness Based on Word Embedding Association Test Towards a Taxonomy of E-Waste Urban Mining Technology Design and Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review Charting Pollution Effects on Tourism: A Regional Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1