Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using the albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio, literature review and meta analysis

Abdulrahaman Ibn Awadh, Khulud Alanazi, A. Alkhenizan
{"title":"Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using the albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio, literature review and meta analysis","authors":"Abdulrahaman Ibn Awadh, Khulud Alanazi, A. Alkhenizan","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Data about the impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio [AAPR] on prognosis in hepatocellular cancer patients are inconclusive and conflicting.\n \n \n \n We systematically searched literatures from 7 databases [PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar and CINAHL], updated to September, 2023. Hazard ratios [HRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] were pooled and synthesized using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient’s prognosis.\n \n \n \n In total, 8 studies involving 13 cohorts with 3,774 cases were included. Pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that higher AAPR was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [OS] [HR=0,429, 95% CI: 0,361–0,509, P=0,001; HR=0,476, 95% CI:0,421–0,538, P= 0,001; respectively]. Similarly, pooled multivariate results showed that higher AAPR was associated with better disease-free survival [DFS] [HR=0,558, 95% CI:0,452–0,688, P= 0,001]. Moreover, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that higher AAPR was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival [RFS] [HR=0,540, 95% CI: 0,420–0,694, P=0,001; HR=0,647, 95% CI:0,494–0,848, P= 0,002; respectively]. Subgroups analysis showed that elevated AAPR still significantly correlated with better OS across the confounding factors. Moreover, sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of these findings and no publication bias was detected.\n \n \n \n In summary, higher AAPR could be considered as a reliable prognostic factor in patients with HCC, which could be used as a routine inspection of HCC patients to individualized prognosis prediction and clinical decision making.\n","PeriodicalId":503882,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","volume":"38 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data about the impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio [AAPR] on prognosis in hepatocellular cancer patients are inconclusive and conflicting. We systematically searched literatures from 7 databases [PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar and CINAHL], updated to September, 2023. Hazard ratios [HRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] were pooled and synthesized using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient’s prognosis. In total, 8 studies involving 13 cohorts with 3,774 cases were included. Pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that higher AAPR was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [OS] [HR=0,429, 95% CI: 0,361–0,509, P=0,001; HR=0,476, 95% CI:0,421–0,538, P= 0,001; respectively]. Similarly, pooled multivariate results showed that higher AAPR was associated with better disease-free survival [DFS] [HR=0,558, 95% CI:0,452–0,688, P= 0,001]. Moreover, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that higher AAPR was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival [RFS] [HR=0,540, 95% CI: 0,420–0,694, P=0,001; HR=0,647, 95% CI:0,494–0,848, P= 0,002; respectively]. Subgroups analysis showed that elevated AAPR still significantly correlated with better OS across the confounding factors. Moreover, sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of these findings and no publication bias was detected. In summary, higher AAPR could be considered as a reliable prognostic factor in patients with HCC, which could be used as a routine inspection of HCC patients to individualized prognosis prediction and clinical decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用白蛋白与碱性磷酸酶比值预测肝细胞癌的预后:文献综述和荟萃分析
有关白蛋白与碱性磷酸酶比值 [AAPR] 对肝细胞癌患者预后影响的数据尚无定论且相互矛盾。 我们系统地检索了 7 个数据库[PubMed、Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、Google Scholar 和 CINAHL]中的文献,更新至 2023 年 9 月。为了评估 AAPR 对患者预后的总体影响,我们使用 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 对危险比[HRs]和 95% 置信区间[CIs]进行了汇总和综合。 共纳入了 8 项研究,涉及 13 个队列,3774 个病例。单变量和多变量分析的汇总结果显示,较高的AAPR是总生存率[OS]的独立预后因素[HR=0,429,95% CI:0,361-0,509,P=0,001;HR=0,476,95% CI:0,421-0,538,P= 0,001;分别]。同样,多变量汇总结果显示,AAPR越高,无病生存率[DFS]越高[HR=0,558,95% CI:0,452-0,688,P= 0,001]。此外,单变量和多变量分析的汇总结果显示,较高的AAPR是无复发生存期[RFS]的独立预后因素[HR=0,540,95% CI:0,420-0,694,P=0,001;HR=0,647,95% CI:0,494-0,848,P= 0,002;分别]。亚组分析显示,AAPR的升高与较好的OS仍有显著相关性,不受混杂因素的影响。此外,敏感性分析表明了这些研究结果的稳健性,未发现发表偏倚。 总之,较高的AAPR可被视为HCC患者的可靠预后因素,可作为HCC患者的常规检查,用于个体化预后预测和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biliary atresia with rare associations: a case report and literature review Unveiling the uncommon: A case report of avascular necrosis in the triquetrum bone without trauma A pocket practical guide on bibliometric analysis: bridging informatics with science in a rapid manner Anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in a symptomatic adult, a case report Challenges in diagnosing and managing hyper-IgE syndrome in a resource-limited setting: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1