Special educational needs provision and academic outcomes for children with teacher reported language difficulties at school entry

JCPP advances Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12264
Sarah Griffiths, Laura Lucas, Debbie Gooch, C. Norbury
{"title":"Special educational needs provision and academic outcomes for children with teacher reported language difficulties at school entry","authors":"Sarah Griffiths, Laura Lucas, Debbie Gooch, C. Norbury","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language ability predicts academic attainment across the curriculum. Teacher report of language difficulties may therefore help schools identify children that require Special Educational Needs (SEN) provision. Special Educational Needs provision is intended to enable children to reach their academic potential, however the effectiveness of this for children with language difficulties is unknown.We linked teacher‐ratings on a brief language difficulties questionnaire (13‐item) collected in the first year of primary school (N = 7013), with data on SEN provision until age 12–13 and scores on statutory assessments at ages 5–6, 6–7 and 10–11 years from the National Pupil Database (UK). We conducted a preregistered analysis to (a) test the association between teacher‐reported language difficulties and later academic outcomes, (b) identify predictors of subsequent SEN provision for monolingual children with language difficulties and (c) test whether SEN provision is associated with better academic outcomes for these children.Teacher‐reported language difficulties predicted achievement in phonics (rs > 0.41), reading (rs > 0.38), writing (rs > 0.32) and maths (rs > 0.40) assessments up to 7 years later. For those with language difficulties, having an existing diagnosis of a neurodevelopmental condition or sensory impairment was the strongest predictor of SEN registration (OR [95% CI] 8.33 [4.12, 19.24]) and special education placement (OR [95% CI] 18.89 [9.29, 42.01]) during primary school. However, 38% of children registered as having a primary speech, language and communication need, lost this registration during transition to secondary education. We could not estimate the effect of SEN provision on academic outcomes, as the majority of children with high propensity to receive SEN provision did receive provision, and very few children in SEN settings completed statutory assessments.Teacher perceptions of language difficulties at school entry, in the presence of additional risk factors, should prompt SEN provision. Recognition and support for language difficulties should be sustained throughout children's education.","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":"133 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language ability predicts academic attainment across the curriculum. Teacher report of language difficulties may therefore help schools identify children that require Special Educational Needs (SEN) provision. Special Educational Needs provision is intended to enable children to reach their academic potential, however the effectiveness of this for children with language difficulties is unknown.We linked teacher‐ratings on a brief language difficulties questionnaire (13‐item) collected in the first year of primary school (N = 7013), with data on SEN provision until age 12–13 and scores on statutory assessments at ages 5–6, 6–7 and 10–11 years from the National Pupil Database (UK). We conducted a preregistered analysis to (a) test the association between teacher‐reported language difficulties and later academic outcomes, (b) identify predictors of subsequent SEN provision for monolingual children with language difficulties and (c) test whether SEN provision is associated with better academic outcomes for these children.Teacher‐reported language difficulties predicted achievement in phonics (rs > 0.41), reading (rs > 0.38), writing (rs > 0.32) and maths (rs > 0.40) assessments up to 7 years later. For those with language difficulties, having an existing diagnosis of a neurodevelopmental condition or sensory impairment was the strongest predictor of SEN registration (OR [95% CI] 8.33 [4.12, 19.24]) and special education placement (OR [95% CI] 18.89 [9.29, 42.01]) during primary school. However, 38% of children registered as having a primary speech, language and communication need, lost this registration during transition to secondary education. We could not estimate the effect of SEN provision on academic outcomes, as the majority of children with high propensity to receive SEN provision did receive provision, and very few children in SEN settings completed statutory assessments.Teacher perceptions of language difficulties at school entry, in the presence of additional risk factors, should prompt SEN provision. Recognition and support for language difficulties should be sustained throughout children's education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师报告入学时有语言障碍的儿童的特殊教育需求提供情况和学习成绩
语言能力预示着整个课程的学业成绩。因此,教师对语言障碍的报告可以帮助学校识别需要特殊教育需求(SEN)服务的儿童。我们将教师对小学一年级学生(7013 人)的简短语言障碍问卷(13 个项目)的评分、12-13 岁前特殊教育需要课程的数据以及英国国家学生数据库(National Pupil Database)中 5-6、6-7 和 10-11 岁法定评估的分数联系起来。我们进行了一项预先登记的分析,以(a) 检验教师报告的语言困难与日后学业成绩之间的关联,(b) 确定有语言困难的单语儿童日后接受特殊教育需求的预测因素,以及(c) 检验为这些儿童提供特殊教育需求是否与更好的学业成绩相关。教师报告的语言困难可预测 7 年后的语音(rs > 0.41)、阅读(rs > 0.38)、写作(rs > 0.32)和数学(rs > 0.40)评估成绩。对于有语言障碍的儿童来说,已有神经发育状况或感官障碍诊断是小学期间特殊教育需要登记(OR [95% CI] 8.33 [4.12, 19.24])和特殊教育安置(OR [95% CI] 18.89 [9.29, 42.01])的最强预测因素。然而,在登记为有小学言语、语言和沟通需求的儿童中,有 38% 的儿童在升入中学时失去了这一登记。我们无法估计提供特殊教育需要对学业成绩的影响,因为大多数倾向于接受特殊教育需要的儿童确实接受了特殊教育需要,而且在特殊教育需要环境中完成法定评估的儿童非常少。对语言困难的认识和支持应贯穿儿童教育的始终。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Implementing open science and reproducible research practices in mental health research through registered reports Special educational needs provision and academic outcomes for children with teacher reported language difficulties at school entry Examining the association of neighborhood conditions on attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in autistic youth using the child opportunity index 2.0 The trajectory of anxiety symptoms during the transition from childhood to young adulthood is predicted by IQ and sex, but not polygenic risk scores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1